THE
PREFACE
TO
AL
ENGLISH
PROTESTANTS
.
IF
the
receaued
saying
(
Nothing
is
so
incredible
,
but
by
wordes
,
(
or
eloquence
)
it
may
be
made
probable
)
can
in
any
case
,
or
time
be
justified
:
most
like
it
is
,
to
be
proued
true
,
when
in
time
of
question
and
controuersie
of
things
,
corrupting
,
falsifying
,
perucrting
,
misapplying
,
and
such
deceitful
dealing
with
Authorities
(
to
delude
the
ignorant
hearers
,
or
readers
)
is
joyned
and
permitted
to
free
wordes
and
writings
,
on
the
one
side
:
And
vnto
the
other
,
by
al
wary
and
vigilant
preuention
,
al
disputing
,
preaching
,
writing
,
printing
,
publishing
,
or
reading
any
thing
,
to
confute
and
controule
it
,
is
forbidden
and
with
seuerities
preuented
.
As
no
man
can
be
ignorant
either
of
the
controuersies
of
this
time
in
matters
of
religion
,
or
that
the
state
of
the
recited
difficulties
(
to
answere
their
aduersaries
)
is
the
case
of
Catholikes
,
disgraced
,
silenced
,
and
persecuted
in
England
:
So
that
the
former
,
of
corruptions
,
falsyfications
,
&
joyned
with
freedome
and
liberty
of
speech
and
writing
,
to
promote
their
opinions
,
is
a
thing
frequently
vsed
of
English
Protestant
Doctors
,
wil
sufficiently
(
euen
by
their
owne
present
testimonies
)
appeare
in
this
Treatise
.
Then
resolution
is
easily
made
,
by
what
meanes
,
by
way
of
learning
,
that
religion
is
maintained
.
And
because
these
Protestants
themselues
(
to
be
cited
hereafter
)
Cap.
1.
s●●
acknowledge
this
corrupting
,
and
falsifying
infection
,
to
be
so
ordinary
,
or
general
among
them
,
that
neitheral
,
many
,
nor
one
writer
,
nor
one
booke
of
quantity
of
their
penning
,
can
be
thus
examined
and
censured
,
but
with
great
loathsomnesse
both
to
the
examiner
,
and
reader
of
such
vile
and
prophane
abusings
,
of
God
,
Religion
,
Scriptures
,
Councels
,
Fathers
,
and
al
Authorities
,
as
may
appeare
in
the
publikely
priuiledged
workes
of
these
men
;
as
namely
D.
Willet
,
stiled
Professor
of
Diuinity
,
Willet
Loydor
.
in
Titul
.
Parkes
against
Lymbom
.
in
his
booke
named
Loydoromastix
,
a
whip
for
a
railer
,
challenging
M.
Parkes
his
fellow
in
religion
,
of
hundreds
of
such
demeanors
in
one
booke
,
and
he
againe
the
other
in
like
order
,
and
al
with
priuiledge
,
with
such
others
.
For
which
cause
desirous
in
this
vnsauoury
subject
,
to
affect
as
much
breuity
as
may
be
,
to
giue
satisfaction
in
this
matter
,
I
haue
of
purpose
passed
ouer
al
that
be
these
notoriously
infamous
among
themselues
,
by
publike
priuiledge
:
And
singled
forth
one
among
them
,
a
Doctor
,
Deane
,
and
great
writer
,
Doctor
Morton
,
which
in
diuers
bookes
,
especially
three
,
his
so
named
,
Ful
satisfaction
,
Preamble
,
Morton
ful
sati●●act
.
Prefat
.
Preamb
.
Epist.
dedicat
.
against
Higg
.
ep
.
dedic
.
and
booke
against
M.
Higgons
(
a
late
Minister
among
them
,
leauing
them
and
becomming
a
Catholike
by
such
their
corruptions
)
and
to
three
great
personages
,
his
Majesty
,
the
right
honourable
Earle
of
Salisbury
Lord
Treasurer
,
and
the
Lord
Eurc
the
Lord
President
of
Wales
,
absolutely
justifieth
himselfe
in
wordes
to
be
a
professed
publisher
of
truth
,
and
no
falsyficator
,
corrupter
,
or
such
wicked
dealer
:
and
is
so
not
only
valued
by
himselfe
,
but
likewise
esteemed
of
(
as
I
vnderstand
)
by
most
and
many
his
Protestant
readers
and
auditors
.
Therefore
before
al
others
I
haue
made
choise
of
this
man
,
so
sincere
and
of
such
integrity
,
by
so
great
Protestant
applause
.
I
haue
made
choise
before
al
others
of
his
writing
,
to
examine
the
principal
part
of
his
booke
named
by
him
,
A
ful
satisfaction
;
because
in
this
he
Ful
satisfact
epist.
dedicat
.
protesteth
to
our
Soueraigne
,
most
great
and
rare
sincerity
from
such
crimes
:
and
intituleth
his
booke
A
ful
satisfaction
,
which
in
sincerity
and
true
dealing
,
must
be
deuoide
of
al
cunning
,
corrupt
,
and
counterfait
behauiour
,
which
doe
offend
and
scandalize
,
and
neither
fully
nor
at
al
satisfie
honest
minded
readers
.
Againe
,
I
haue
chosen
this
booke
,
because
it
,
was
written
,
printed
,
published
,
and
by
great
Protestants
priuiledged
,
(
if
not
helped
in
composing
)
in
time
of
Conuocation
.
And
further
,
I
rather
choose
this
,
not
only
because
it
was
written
against
my selfe
Authour
of
the
Moderate
answere
to
his
positions
:
but
in
respect
he
complaineth
in
his
Preamble
,
why
I
had
not
written
against
that
,
his
named
ful
satisfaction
also
:
speaking
as
though
I
had
got
a
scratch
(
some
foile
he
meaneth
)
at
his
handes
,
neither
reflecting
vpon
any
vnworthinesse
in
his
owne
worke
,
or
difficulty
which
Catholike
Students
in
England
haue
to
publish
little
,
though
they
write
much
,
and
often
with
no
great
ease
or
his
helps
to
aide
them
.
But
although
I
neuer
judged
(
as
I
shal
hereafter
demonstrate
)
that
his
booke
to
be
any
satisfaction
to
my
answere
,
nor
of
it selfe
worth
my
labour
to
confute
;
yet
(
as
I
can
proue
Morton
Preamb
.
chap.
of
Stage
,
&c.
by
many
witnesses
)
I
had
censured
both
that
,
and
his
Preamble
also
,
within
six
weekes
(
and
lesse
)
of
their
first
birth
;
And
my
prints
prouided
taken
or
hindered
(
one
of
those
my
bookes
begunne
to
be
printed
)
I
had
no
meanes
to
publish
either
,
vntil
his
bookes
were
out
of
date
(
as
neuer
in
much
)
or
were
otherwise
answered
.
Whether
I
feare
any
Protestants
scratch
in
schooles
or
no
,
he
may
know
,
if
they
wil
graunt
vs
disputation
,
now
they
deny
vs
printing
.
And
I
not
only
for
these
reasons
doe
now
censure
him
,
but
because
in
his
Preamble
it
pleaseth
him
to
bring
me
vpon
the
stage
(
as
he
calleth
it
)
to
play
a
part
with
his
Roman
aduersary
,
and
himselfe
:
where
although
I
doe
not
finde
,
that
I
am
either
scratched
or
bitten
with
his
nailes
or
teeth
,
though
bawled
and
barked
at
with
his
tongue
,
as
Latrantes
vse
.
Yet
now
I
am
enforced
to
enter
the
stage
;
and
I
feare
his
part
wil
proue
to
be
that
,
which
his
Greeke
name
signifieth
,
as
commonly
in
Comedies
and
Tragedies
Actors
be
chosen
,
to
make
better
resemblance
of
thinges
.
I
also
choose
that
part
of
his
booke
not
only
because
it
is
the
first
in
order
:
But
is
the
defence
and
propugnacle
of
the
very
ground
of
al
his
writing
against
vs
,
in
that
kinde
,
as
himselfe
hath
Rom.
pos
.
●at
.
●
.
written
,
and
that
failing
al
his
building
is
ouerthrowne
.
Againe
,
I
choose
his
defence
of
that
maine
argument
;
because
it
containeth
more
of
my
booke
,
then
any
other
,
and
more
then
many
of
some
of
the
rest
.
And
yet
notwithstanding
al
this
,
and
more
causes
,
vrging
or
rather
(
by
his
behauiour
)
necessitating
me
to
Morton
against
Higg
.
ep
.
dedic
.
write
,
I
could
haue
beene
silent
(
hoping
better
of
him
hereafter
)
but
that
I
see
him
newly
glory
of
his
innocency
,
and
singular
sincerity
in
this
behauiour
,
whereof
I
am
to
accuse
him
:
and
busie
himselfe
further
(
as
I
am
informed
)
then
either
honour
or
triumph
wil
be
his
reward
.
Therefore
to
passe
ouer
other
authorities
,
partly
because
he
D.
Mortons
corruption
how
great
in
that
first
part
of
his
booke
to
be
examined
,
and
proued
in
this
Treatise
.
hath
heard
of
his
sincerity
in
them
before
,
as
also
they
are
not
so
easie
to
be
examined
of
ordinary
readers
:
I
wil
omit
al
thinges
whereof
he
hath
beene
by
others
admonished
,
and
take
leauings
,
only
his
citations
of
my
writing
in
that
his
sincere
part
of
ful
satisfaction
,
(
as
he
tearmeth
it
)
and
directly
demonstrate
not
only
that
among
al
those
(
being
many
)
there
is
not
one
which
is
not
either
fasly
and
corruptly
cited
or
applied
,
but
often
times
in
one
citation
diuers
and
sundry
corruptions
,
and
such
like
abuses
,
are
committed
by
this
man
of
sincerity
:
and
not
one
citation
among
them
al
,
to
be
found
free
from
such
dealings
.
Neither
by
ending
my
examination
there
,
doe
I
free
any
of
his
arguments
,
or
citations
following
,
but
end
there
at
this
time
,
only
for
my
(
before
)
alleaged
reasons
.
And
if
it
shal
be
needful
D.
Mortons
like
corruption
in
the
whole
booke
following
,
against
the
Moderate
answe●e
,
offered
to
be
proued
,
in
the
same
manner
,
&c.
hereafter
to
discouer
the
rest
,
if
print
may
be
permitted
,
or
Doctor
Morton
wil
truly
print
my
booke
,
word
by
word
,
in
his
answere
vnto
it
,
I
shal
procure
it
to
be
sent
written
vnto
him
.
Wherein
(
to
giue
an
vndoubted
patterne
of
a
perfect
Protestant
Professor
)
I
now
vndertake
to
proue
likewise
of
al
his
citations
of
my
writing
following
,
that
among
them
al
,
there
is
not
one
among
foure
,
which
is
free
from
corruption
,
falsifying
,
peruerting
,
or
some
such
abusing
.
I
doe
not
absolutely
say
that
al
following
without
exception
be
such
,
(
but
not
one
among
foure
to
be
f●eed
)
for
that
were
more
then
monstrous
in
him
,
and
would
otherwise
depriue
him
of
his
pittiful
shifts
and
practizes
,
to
auoide
arguments
,
and
abuse
other
authorities
,
which
his
Offer
of
conf
.
owne
bretheren
in
religion
charge
him
,
to
haue
committed
in
that
his
booke
against
me
.
And
now
to
my
promised
purpose
.
THE
FIRST
CHAPTER
Demonstratiuely
proueth
,
by
the
present
English
Protestant
Bishops
,
Doctors
,
and
Writers
,
that
corruption
of
Scriptures
and
al
Authorities
,
is
so
vsual
among
them
,
that
they
cannot
be
beleeued
.
IF
I
could
produce
no
other
presumption
,
or
argument
of
wilful
corruptions
,
falsyfications
,
slaunders
,
and
other
enormious
dealings
of
that
kinde
,
in
the
published
writings
of
M.
Doctor
MORTON
,
Protestant
Deane
of
Glocester
,
(
as
I
●m
informed
)
then
only
his
Ministerial
function
and
calling
it
else
:
yet
the
late
(
and
present
also
)
Protestant
Professors
,
Do●tors
,
and
chiefest
handlers
of
Diuinity
,
of
his
owne
profession
,
●nd
the
publikely
authorized
Examiners
and
Approuers
of
their
●rinted
bookes
,
doe
testific
it
to
be
so
vsual
and
general
a
cu●tome
among
them
,
to
corrupt
,
falsyfie
,
slaunder
,
and
abuse
the
●oly
Scriptures
,
Councels
,
Fathers
,
and
al
sacred
Authorities
,
for
the
countenance
of
their
cause
,
with
the
ignorant
readers
:
That
●
man
may
without
any
rash
,
precipitate
,
or
vncharitable
judge●ent
suppose
,
that
neither
D.
Morton
,
nor
any
other
in
particu●ar
among
the
The
notorious
corruption
vsed
by
english
Protestant
writers
by
their
owne
wordes
.
writers
of
his
degree
,
and
religion
in
England
,
●an
be
freed
from
those
and
such
like
vnchristian
,
prophane
,
and
●religious
behauiour
.
For
a
short
tast
,
of
which
distastful
testimony
,
of
these
men
●gainst
themselues
:
The
Protestant
Bishop
of
Winchester
D.
Bilson
Sur
.
of
Christs
suffer
.
pag
.
274.
275.
&c.
Couel
de●
.
of
Hooker
,
pag
.
7.
9.
Exam
.
pag
.
28.
71.
139.
against
Burg
.
pref
.
&
pag
.
24.
Parks
ag.
Limb
.
sect
.
18.
21.
pag
.
181.
166.
101.
100.
sect
.
10.
11.
20.
7.
12.
15.
16.
Ormerod
.
pict
.
pur
.
l.
1.
Paganop
.
pag
.
56.
Willet
Antilog
pref
.
Loydoro
.
in
Tit
.
&
pert●t
.
Burges
Apol
.
offer
.
of
confer
.
pag
.
8.
9.
13.
14.
22.
18.
25.
28.
29.
30.
Relation
cap
.
32.
Sutuey
,
pag
.
7.
160.
def
.
of
Minist
.
reas
pag
.
33.
3●
.
11.
22.
Prach
.
except
.
11.
D.
Bilson
,
D.
Couel
,
M.
Parkes
,
M.
Ormerod
,
D.
Willet
,
M.
Burges
,
the
Protestant
authours
of
the
offer
of
conference
,
The
relation
of
religion
,
Suruey
of
the
booke
of
common
praier
,
The
defendor
of
the
Ministers
reasons
,
The
22.
Preachers
of
London
,
with
others
(
too
many
to
be
recited
)
haue
published
in
●heir
writings
,
printed
and
applauded
,
that
the
English
Mini●ters
of
this
Kingdome
haue
so
falsly
translated
,
corrupted
,
in●ignely
handled
,
clipped
,
abused
,
vntruly
alleaged
,
misquoted
,
●aimed
Scriptures
.
Fathers
,
and
other
Authorities
,
so
peruerted
the
true
arguments
,
deceaued
the
world
,
belied
Catholike
writers
,
shifted
of
obi●ctions
,
and
so
abused
this
present
age
,
and
preiudiced
posterity
,
in
relation
of
thinges
,
(
loue
and
disake
so
dazeling
their
eies
)
that
they
cannot
be
beleeued
.
Therefore
,
the
testimony
of
English
Protestant
Doctors
and
writers
,
being
this
,
of
their
present
writing
Ministers
,
and
bretheren
in
religion
,
it
shal
be
sufficient
to
excuse
a
Catholike
opposite
,
to
suspect
D.
Morton
a
man
of
that
calling
,
to
be
infected
also
,
with
that
their
most
filthy
wickednesse
of
corruptions
,
falsyfications
,
and
especially
if
we
consider
how
this
aduersary
of
true
religion
,
neither
by
name
,
Etimologie
of
Morton
.
age
,
industry
,
wisdome
,
or
Diuinity
,
excelleth
al
Protestants
,
which
went
before
him
,
neither
fooles
in
tune
,
nomine
,
or
re
,
and
yet
chargeth
Catholikes
with
such
doctrine
and
dealings
,
as
neuer
The
descanter
of
the
letters
P.
R.
in
his
Preamble
.
any
of
his
profession
before
him
,
hath
attempted
to
doe
.
And
the
Protestant
witnesses
of
such
ordinary
falsyfications
,
and
abuses
among
them
are
so
many
,
so
great
,
and
for
the
most
part
allowed
with
publike
Protestant
priuiledge
,
to
be
truly
verified
of
these
men
.
THE
SECOND
CHAPTER
.
How
D.
MORTON
must
needes
(
by
his
owne
wordes
)
confesse
himselfe
,
either
a
wilful
corrupter
,
or
so
grosly
ignorant
or
carelesse
in
writing
,
that
he
is
vnworthy
any
credit
.
ANd
I
am
rather
induced
to
giue
this
sentence
,
vpon
this
Doctors
corrupt
,
and
falsifying
dealings
,
being
animated
thereunto
,
by
his
owne
free
and
voluntary
confession
of
this
his
vile
and
abhominable
proceedings
,
either
through
grosse
and
inexcusable
ignorance
,
which
a
man
would
not
thinke
to
finde
in
a
person
representing
his
place
,
or
challenging
to
himselfe
such
skil
and
d●xterity
in
writing
:
or
wilful
and
determinate
desire
he
hath
to
plant
errours
,
conceale
and
abandon
truth
,
and
malitiously
condemne
himselfe
,
to
deceaue
his
readers
.
For
in
a
worke
intituled
the
first
part
of
an
Apologie
,
himselfe
so
farre
Mo●t
.
1.
part
.
Apol
.
Part
.
2.
●pol
.
epist.
dedicat
.
Apol
.
part
.
2.
in
fine
in
tabul
.
D.
Mort
.
worke
of
ten
years
labour
,
how
sincere
it
was
,
by
his
owne
testimony
.
acknowledgeth
his
owne
errours
in
that
booke
,
(
which
as
he
witnesseth
cost
him
ten
yeares
study
)
that
in
his
second
part
of
the
same
worke
,
published
the
yeare
following
1606.
he
spendeth
almost
fiue
leaues
,
with
breuiates
of
faultes
,
printed
in
a
very
smal
character
,
to
correct
his
corruptions
,
or
mistakings
,
(
as
he
would
haue
them
named
)
committed
in
his
first
booke
,
a
child
of
so
great
trauaile
by
the
fathers
confession
,
and
not
great
in
quantity
.
Now
whether
so
many
and
material
thinges
(
by
his
owne
testimony
)
are
more
like
to
be
grosly
ignorantly
,
or
malitiously
wilfully
falsyfied
,
when
they
escaped
his
diligence
of
ten
yeares
,
and
were
found
after
within
lesse
then
ten
moneths
,
I
referre
it
to
be
censured
(
an
hard
choise
for
so
respect●d
a
writer
)
by
his
best
friendes
and
followers
:
for
if
my selfe
should
sentence
vpon
him
in
this
case
,
he
hath
giuen
me
occasion
in
his
owne
wordes
,
to
thinke
him
so
culpable
,
that
I
should
meruaile
he
should
either
dare
to
stand
so
much
,
and
so
often
vpon
his
integrity
in
writing
sincerely
,
or
not
to
blush
to
publish
any
thing
after
his
so
foule
and
vnexcusable
(
yet
priuileged
)
abuse
:
for
that
we
may
easily
see
him
to
be
in
this
desperate
condition
,
without
further
examining
his
bookes
in
particular
:
the
very
Titles
of
his
two
tables
,
of
his
remembred
escapes
or
corruptions
,
are
more
then
sufficient
argument
,
and
registred
by
himselfe
in
these
wordes
.
Tabula
prima
ea
vitia
continet
quae
in
citatione
Morton
part
.
2.
Apol
.
sup
.
in
fin.
testimoniorum
:
secunda
quae
in
testimonijs
citat
is
deprehenduntur
.
The
first
Table
containeth
the
faults
(
or
vices
)
which
are
found
in
the
citation
of
the
testimonies
:
The
second
Table
containeth
those
faults
(
or
vices
)
which
are
found
in
the
testim●●ies
cited
.
So
that
by
the
authours
owne
acknowledgement
,
●either
his
manner
of
citing
authorities
,
nor
the
authorities
(
or
supposed
authorities
)
there
cited
can
be
beleeued
;
And
yet
that
worke
(
if
any
wil
thinke
it
worthy
reading
,
as
I
cannot
encourage
him
to
doe
)
wholy
or
principally
consisteth
of
matters
of
that
kinde
.
If
D.
Morton
wil
say
this
was
wilful
corruption
in
him
;
and
his
badde
cause
cannot
otherwise
be
maintained
,
I
request
no
more
,
my
intent
is
obtained
:
If
he
wil
further
shame
himselfe
,
M.
Doctor
and
M.
Deane
in
actu
,
and
Lord
Bishop
in
potentia
,
and
pretend
ignorance
,
negligence
,
or
any
such
idle
and
vaine
pretence
,
in
so
serious
and
important
businesse
;
it
redoundeth
to
his
as
great
disgrace
,
and
ignominy
in
the
same
kinde
.
For
no
man
but
voide
of
al
shame
and
conscience
,
can
expect
or
request
to
be
commended
for
integrity
and
sincerity
(
●s
he
often
challengeth
to
himselfe
)
who
by
his
owne
wordes
is
conuicted
of
so
childish
,
boy-like
,
and
bankerupt
behauiour
.
Or
who
(
except
altogether
ridiculou●
)
can
or
wil
hope
,
that
juditious
readers
,
or
any
(
but
madde
or
frantike
)
wil
giue
credit
to
the
writing
,
assertion
,
or
protestation
of
such
a
Protestant
,
so
palpably
prostituted
either
in
shameful
ignorant
,
or
malitious
wilful
corruptions
,
in
thinges
of
greatest
moment
,
Religion
?
THE
THIRD
CHAPTER
.
How
D.
MORTON
challenging
Catholike
Priests
of
disobedience
to
Protestant
Princes
,
is
himselfe
(
by
his
o●ne
writing
)
notoriously
culpable
for
his
opinion
in
that
kinde
.
THirdly
,
I
may
justly
suppose
,
that
if
this
Doctor
would
or
could
shew
sincerity
and
true
dealing
in
any
thing
,
he
would
haue
made
manifestation
of
it
in
that
worke
,
and
his
defence
where
he
so
vnchantably
and
vntruly
(
as
hath
beene
proued
against
him
long
since
)
accuseth
Catholikes
,
especially
in
matters
of
alleageance
,
and
duty
to
Princes
,
for
which
in
apparance
he
hath
proctored
so
much
:
and
not
be
of
that
boldnesse
and
so
voide
of
either
integrity
or
shame
,
that
he
doth
not
blush
to
enter
both
into
the
state
of
desperate
disloialty
in
himselfe
,
but
the
rather
to
procure
partakers
in
his
wickednesse
and
D.
Morton
his
dutiful
loue
to
Protestant
Princes
what
it
is
by
his
owne
doctrine
.
vndutifulnesse
both
to
Queene
Elizabeth
deceased
,
and
our
Soueraigne
liuing
(
whom
God
long
and
happily
preserue
)
both
Protestant
Princes
and
Patrons
of
his
profession
,
he
contemneth
and
denieth
the
very
publike
,
and
knowne
lawes
,
and
statute
of
this
Kingdome
,
and
in
the
greatest
point
of
obedience
,
wherein
euery
one
(
though
of
smal
experience
)
can
tel
him
how
farre
he
is
fallen
from
his
promised
integrity
and
sincerity
:
And
al
men
louing
and
dutiful
to
our
late
Queenes
,
and
present
King
,
and
his
posterity
,
wil
and
must
reject
and
detest
him
,
as
vndutiful
and
injurious
(
I
write
too
modestly
of
this
man
)
vnto
them
al.
For
whereas
the
Catholike
authour
of
the
Moderate
answere
to
his
fond
positions
had
shewed
,
that
both
Queene
Mary
and
Elizabeth
(
though
formerly
disinherited
by
their
Father
King
Henry
the
eight
)
yet
were
both
by
the
same
Prince
in
publike
Parliament
,
restored
againe
to
the
right
of
the
Crowne
,
and
so
both
of
them
enjoyed
it
:
This
sincere
Doctor
and
man
of
integrity
answereth
in
these
wordes
:
I
haue
enquired
in
the
Acts
which
are
extant
,
and
I
finde
three
Morton
in
his
Iustification
of
Protestants
,
pag
.
100.
Acts
whereby
the
a-foresaid
daughters
(
Mary
and
Elizabeth
)
were
disabled
,
as
namely
in
Annis
(
the
yeares
)
25.
28.
33.
of
King
Henry
his
raigne
:
but
for
establishing
of
them
in
the
right
of
succession
,
I
thinke
you
cannot
shew
it
,
except
it
be
in
anno
nunquam
,
canone
nusquam
,
in
the
yeare
neuer
,
the
canon
no
where
.
Hitherto
his
owne
wordes
,
in
his
so
priuileged
booke
,
and
he
calleth
it
boldnesse
to
affirme
the
contrary
.
Therefore
,
least
my selfe
should
seeme
too
bold
,
in
sodainely
presuming
to
censure
this
sincere
Doctor
,
so
absolute
in
this
matter
,
I
wil
first
desire
D.
Barlow
now
Protestant
Bishop
of
Lincolne
(
I
hope
his
equal
)
to
take
this
boldnesse
vpon
him
,
and
to
tel
D.
Morton
that
he
is
fouly
and
shamefully
too
bold
,
and
farre
from
integrity
in
this
great
businesse
.
This
Bishop
writing
expresly
against
this
vnsincere
opinion
of
M.
Deane
of
Glocester
,
and
charging
a
Catholike
writer
(
though
manifestly
vntruly
)
to
be
of
the
same
minde
,
excusing
the
first
disinheriting
,
and
shewing
the
legittimation
againe
of
those
Queenes
,
writeth
thus
:
Princes
are
men
,
and
Parliaments
are
assemblies
of
men
,
and
men
Barlow
answ
.
to
a
namelesse
Cathol
.
pa.
88.
(
as
the
Philosopher
said
to
a
great
King
)
are
changeable
creatures
:
looke
therefore
backward
;
the
same
both
Prince
and
Parliament
but
two
yeares
before
,
had
ratified
the
marriage
with
her
Mother
for
lawful
:
and
inuested
the
off-spring
of
her
body
with
the
succession
to
the
Crowne
.
Looke
forwardes
,
but
seauen
yeares
Statut
.
An.
35.
after
,
and
the
same
both
head
and
body
,
reuiued
the
legittimation
,
repealed
the
annulling
statute
,
and
pronouncing
the
Lady
Elizabeth
for
his
lawful
daughter
,
reduced
the
Crowne
to
her
right
and
interest
againe
.
Hitherto
the
wordes
of
this
Protestant
Bishop
,
against
this
Protestant
Deane
,
and
although
he
doth
not
mention
Queene
Mary
,
because
he
entreateth
only
of
Queene
Elizabeth
,
yet
the
statute
cited
by
him
comprehendeth
them
both
,
as
I
shal
now
alleage
boldly
,
against
Doctor
Morton
,
much
more
bold
,
then
sincere
:
And
for
the
yeare
which
he
callet●
nunquam
.
neuer
,
I
assigne
the
Statut
.
He●●i●
.
8.
●●
.
35
Regni
Westmin
.
c
.
1.
collect
.
of
Statu●s
printed
,
An.
1603.
titul
.
Crowne
.
same
35.
yeare
of
King
He●●●
the
eight
,
which
Bishop
Barlow
hath
also
assigned
vnto
him
before
:
for
the
place
,
I
name
Westminster
,
where
the
Parliament
was
kept
that
yeare
:
and
for
the
Canon
or
Chapter
(
which
his
integrity
tearmeth
nusquam
,
I
cite
and
tel
him
it
is
in
the
first
Chapter
;
The
words
of
the
Abridgement
of
the
statutes
lately
enough
printed
,
in
the
yeare
1603.
are
these
:
The
crowne
of
England
is
entailed
to
the
Kings
daughter
,
the
Lady
Mary
,
and
to
the
heir●s
of
her
body
:
and
for
lacke
of
such
issue
to
the
Kings
daughter
the
Lady
Elizabeth
.
The
statute
at
large
wil
more
largely
shew
the
great
insincerity
and
little
integrity
of
this
Protestant
Minister
.
And
the
regiments
of
those
two
Queenes
,
so
ratified
and
publikely
applauded
,
wil
argue
too
much
boldnesse
in
this
dutiful
writer
.
But
perhaps
D.
Morton
would
desire
to
be
thought
to
beare
so
respectiue
loue
to
his
Majesty
and
his
Catholike
M●ther
,
Queene
of
Scotland
before
him
,
that
he
wished
the
Crowne
of
England
should
then
haue
descended
vnto
his
,
by
the
first
Parliament
illegittimation
of
those
English
Queenes
,
Mary
and
Elizabeth
,
because
he
seemeth
to
suppose
in
his
positions
that
a
person
illegittimate
cannot
be
made
legittimate
.
And
this
I
should
(
rather
then
anything
contrary
)
haue
expected
of
him
,
which
in
so
much
sincerity
and
integrity
,
would
see
me
to
pleade
so
earnestly
for
our
present
Kings
,
safety
and
security
:
although
I
could
neuer
yet
reade
a
Protestant
Minister
,
which
in
sincerity
might
be
thought
to
desire
that
any
Catholike
Prince
(
such
as
his
Majesties
Mother
liued
and
died
)
though
neu●r
so
true
Inheritour
,
should
possesse
or
ke●pe
their
Crowne
.
But
Doctor
Morton
cleareth
his
meaning
in
this
matter
,
and
neither
respecteth
D.
Morton
in
Iustification
supr
.
pag
.
101.
the
Catholike
Mother
,
no●
the
Protes●ant
Sonne
our
Soueraigne
:
for
in
the
same
Treatise
,
fi●st
he
j●stifiet●
Crammer
,
Ridley
,
and
al
other
Protestants
wh●ch
j●yned
with
Lady
Iane
Seymer
,
(
mained
to
the
Lord
Gilf●rd
Dudley
)
to
aduaunce
a
Title
in
her
to
the
Crowne
,
absolutely
to
barre
&
illegittimate
according
to
his
former
doctrine
,
both
the
Titles
of
our
Queens
,
Mary
and
Elizabeth
,
in
England
;
and
for
euer
to
inualidate
the
lawful
and
just
descent
and
interest
of
the
daughter
of
King
Henry
the
seauenth
,
married
to
●ing
Iames
of
Scotland
,
of
whom
his
Majesty
is
truly
and
lineally
descended
.
And
expressing
his
affection
in
this
businesse
,
and
to
shew
how
much
this
pleader
for
Princes
,
loueth
and
fauoureth
their
true
right
and
possession
,
speaking
of
the
Protestants
rebels
against
Queene
Mary
of
England
,
who
next
succeeded
King
Edward
the
sixt
,
and
was
to
suppresse
(
for
her selfe
,
her
sister
Queene
Elizabeth
,
and
the
line
of
his
Majesty
)
the
pretended
claime
of
Lady
Iane
,
so
much
approued
by
this
Doctor
,
he
breaketh
intemperately
into
these
wordes
:
If
King
Henry
(
the
8.
)
might
haue
Pag
.
101.
sup
.
spoken
from
the
dead
,
in
the
day
of
the
succession
of
Queene
Mary
,
he
would
haue
pleaded
the
cause
of
the
apposites
.
Those
he
meaneth
,
which
with
him
maintained
Lady
Iane
for
Queene
:
and
laboured
to
frustrate
the
right
of
Queene
Mary
,
Elizabeth
,
and
our
present
Soueraigne
King
Iames
.
And
further
he
particularly
Morton
sup
▪
defendeth
the
letters
patents
of
King
Edward
the
sixt
,
a
child
,
supposed
to
giue
the
Crowne
vnto
the
same
Lady
Iane
,
and
vtterly
disinherite
al
others
,
Queene
Mary
,
Elizabeth
,
and
the
house
of
King
Iames
.
Such
is
the
integrity
,
sincerity
,
and
incorrupt
behauiour
,
of
this
worthy
Deane
and
Doctor
,
euen
in
that
matter
,
and
that
b●oke
,
wherein
he
so
vehemently
ouerbreadeth
himselfe
,
to
finde
any
exception
against
Catholike
subj●ct●
.
And
besides
these
,
in
the
same
his
named
Iustification
Morton
Iustifi
.
of
Protest
.
of
Protestants
,
he
justifieth
for
true
,
so
many
and
monstrous
disobedient
and
rebellious
assertions
of
Caluin
,
and
other
Protestants
,
that
this
place
of
breuity
permitteth
not
,
and
I
am
ash●med
to
repeate
them
.
Then
what
sincere
dealing
is
to
be
hoped
for
at
this
mans
handes
,
so
guilty
and
impudent
,
to
defend
those
horrible
crimes
in
himselfe
and
Protestants
,
which
he
so
condemneth
in
others
,
I
leaue
to
censure
.
THE
FOVRTH
CHAPTER
.
How
D.
MORTON
in
particular
is
censured
of
English
Protestant
writers
,
to
haue
abused
my
writings
;
and
discredited
himselfe
in
his
answeres
vnto
me
,
in
his
b●oke
to
be
examined
.
ANd
to
come
somewhat
nearer
the
vnsincere
and
corrupt
dealing
of
D.
Morton
in
particular
,
in
that
his
booke
(
or
first
part
whereof
)
I
am
to
examine
:
his
owne
bretheren
in
D.
Mortons
shifts
by
Protestant
witnesses
in
his
full
satisfaction
.
religion
the
Protestant
authours
,
and
consenters
vnto
the
booke
intituled
,
A
Christian
and
modest
offer
,
of
a
most
indifferent
conference
,
entreating
of
my
arguments
against
D.
Morton
,
giue
their
censure
against
him
in
these
wordes
:
In
a
late
reply
vnto
Christian
and
modest
offer
pag
.
19.
the
Papists
,
the
matter
is
pittifully
shifted
off
.
A
pittiful
thing
,
that
a
man
so
sincere
as
he
valueth
himselfe
,
and
worthy
a
writer
,
as
he
would
be
esteemed
,
should
thus
be
sentenced
by
his
owne
friendes
.
And
he
is
so
bold
with
the
whole
conference
Confor
.
pag
.
47.
at
Hampton-Court
,
before
the
King
,
and
the
Kings
speach
it selfe
,
not
knowing
how
to
auoide
my
answere
without
some
other
shameful
deuise
,
that
the
same
his
Protestant
consortesin
religion
taxe
him
againe
of
his
pittiful
shifting
in
that
businesse
,
and
thereupon
cal
the
credit
of
the
Narration
of
the
Hampton
conference
,
(
penned
by
D.
Barlow
now
Protestant
Bishop
of
Lincolne
)
into
question
.
Their
wordes
are
these
:
That
which
Christian
and
modest
offer
,
pag
.
28.
is
set
forth
as
the
true
report
of
it
,
deser●eth
no
credit
:
the
rather
considering
,
that
D.
Morton
hath
beene
allowed
to
cal
some
part
of
it
into
question
,
euen
some
speaches
fathered
vpon
his
Maiesty
.
Therefore
seing
the
matter
is
come
to
this
issue
,
euen
by
the
testimony
of
Protestants
themselues
,
that
either
the
Bishops
,
and
the
rest
of
the
Ministry
,
assembled
at
Hampton
,
haue
a
licence
by
their
religion
to
say
and
vnsay
,
in
such
thinges
,
or
Bishop
Barlow
is
a
false
reporter
,
or
these
Protestants
charging
M.
Morton
be
wicked
slaunderers
(
let
them
take
among
them
)
this
Deane
of
Glocester
,
of
whom
I
entreate
is
culpable
of
that
,
whereof
he
is
accused
.
And
now
I
haue
proued
my
purpose
,
and
his
wickednesse
by
his
owne
fellowes
in
profession
,
I
may
more
confidently
suppose
,
that
which
an
other
not
inferiour
to
these
men
in
vertuous
learning
,
hath
written
of
him
in
the
same
businesse
,
and
is
vertually
graunted
to
be
true
by
D.
Morton
himselfe
.
For
better
justifying
whereof
,
this
Protestant
Deane
writing
of
the
like
businesse
,
whereof
we
now
entreate
,
concerning
corruptions
,
false
allegations
,
and
such
,
in
the
same
booke
(
for
which
I
now
challenge
him
of
these
proceedings
)
citeth
and
setteth
downe
a
law
,
for
trial
of
such
thinges
,
in
these
wordes
:
He
that
excepteth
in
some
,
doth
yeeld
to
the
rest
.
Morton
reply
,
pag
.
49.
Yet
when
a
Catholike
aduersary
had
charged
him
,
of
so
many
and
notorious
corruptions
,
falsyfications
,
as
are
not
Mitigat
.
p.
102.
easily
to
be
recompted
,
this
sincere
Doctor
doth
only
except
against
14.
or
thereabouts
,
as
appeareth
from
the
88.
page
Morton
Preamb
.
pag
.
88.
of
his
Preamble
,
to
the
end
thereof
,
and
although
he
is
farre
from
excusing
himselfe
in
those
,
yet
he
mentioneth
none
D.
Mort
.
foiled
by
the
Moderate
answerer
,
by
his
own●
law
,
&c.
wherewith
I
shal
hereafter
accuse
him
,
neither
speaketh
any
thing
to
free
his
booke
from
such
vile
corruptions
,
as
he
is
accused
and
consequently
(
by
his
owne
law
before
)
condemned
off
,
in
general
tearmes
by
the
authour
of
the
Mitigation
,
concerning
his
satisfying
of
my
answere
.
Some
whereof
doe
follow
in
this
manner
:
This
replier
(
D.
Morton
)
is
so
farre
Mitigat
.
supt
.
from
performing
his
promise
,
of
a
ful
satisfaction
,
and
that
he
hath
scarce
satisfied
fully
or
meanely
,
one
argument
or
authority
alleaged
by
his
aduersary
.
To
this
accusation
this
Doctor
taketh
no
exception
at
al
,
but
by
his
former
law
confesseth
himselfe
g●ilty
.
But
this
shal
not
be
al
,
whereof
he
is
conuicted
:
for
he
is
accused
further
,
in
these
wordes
,
and
by
his
owne
law
also
thereof
condemned
.
This
Minister
T.
M.
in
his
reply
Mitigat
.
pag
.
113.
114.
doth
vse
al
the
arte
possible
,
to
dissemble
the
same
,
telling
a
peece
of
his
aduersaries
allegations
in
one
place
,
and
another
peece
in
an
other
,
altering
al
order
both
of
chapters
,
matter
,
and
methode
,
set
downe
by
the
answerer
,
so
as
neuer
Hare
when
shee
would
sit
,
did
vse
more
turnings
and
windings
,
for
couering
her selfe
(
which
the
reader
may
obserue
,
euen
by
the
places
themselues
quoted
by
him
out
of
his
aduersaries
booke
:
)
yet
are
his
answeres
such
,
where
he
doth
answere
,
(
for
to
sundry
points
he
saith
nothing
at
al
)
as
doe
easily
shew
,
that
in
substance
he
confesseth
al
,
and
cannot
deny
what
is
obiected
.
Al
this
Doctor
Morton
taketh
quietly
,
being
truly
affirmed
of
him
,
and
himselfe
by
his
owne
law
and
judgement
(
as
before
)
justly
so
to
be
reprehended
.
And
he
disgesteth
in
an
other
place
,
with
as
great
contentment
,
this
which
followeth
.
To
the
point
it selfe
of
his
Mitigat
.
pag
.
92.
9●
.
reply
,
which
he
calleth
A
ful
satisfaction
:
it
seemeth
to
me
,
as
ful
pipes
and
hogsheads
are
wont
to
be
here
in
these
Countries
,
at
the
time
of
Vintage
,
when
they
are
ful
,
only
of
winde
and
aire
,
and
nothing
else
:
so
you
shal
see
afterwardes
,
that
his
reply
is
ful
of
wordes
,
without
substance
,
of
flourish
without
truth
,
of
fraude
without
real
dealing
:
for
that
lightly
he
scarcely
alleageth
any
text
of
his
aduersaries
writing
,
without
some
sort
of
sophistication
,
both
of
wordes
and
sence
,
or
other
like
knacks
.
And
further
so
distracteth
and
dismembreth
his
aduersaries
threede
of
speach
,
citing
one
branch
of
it
in
one
part
of
his
reply
,
an
other
in
another
,
one
sentence
first
,
that
should
haue
beene
last
,
and
an
other
last
,
that
should
haue
beene
first
,
thereby
to
confound
the
readers
memory
:
one
periode
halfe
deuided
,
the
other
quartered
,
the
third
left
out
,
the
fourth
disguised
:
So
that
it
is
euident
,
that
he
sought
rather
to
fly
,
to
couer
,
shadow
,
and
hide
himselfe
,
then
really
and
substantially
to
come
to
the
combate
.
When
we
come
to
the
substance
,
we
find
that
neither
he
alleageth
his
aduersaries
speach
sincerely
,
nor
answereth
truly
to
the
sence
,
but
either
dissembleth
the
same
or
runneth
aside
,
or
confirmeth
his
aduersaries
argument
by
his
feeble
answers
.
Hitherto
the
sentence
and
judgement
against
D.
Morton
:
to
which
he
pleadeth
nothing
,
nor
excepteth
against
it
,
but
(
by
his
owne
law
and
position
)
acknowledgeth
he
is
a
man
justly
condemned
of
these
enormious
crimes
objected
.
Which
al
readers
,
which
wil
not
grosly
voluntarily
be
seduced
and
dwel
in
errour
,
shal
acknowledge
also
by
those
so
many
particulars
,
joyntly
without
intermission
which
I
shal
demonstrate
against
him
.
THE
FIFT
CHAPTER
.
Freeing
the
Authour
of
any
one
such
corrupting
or
wicked
abuse
in
writing
.
NExt
vnto
these
,
and
before
I
enter
into
the
particular
corruptions
,
and
abuses
of
this
Doctor
,
in
his
firnamed
Ful
satisfaction
;
because
I
wil
not
accuse
an
other
,
of
that
whereof
my self
should
be
culpable
,
I
wil
examine
whether
he
doth
,
or
can
(
for
if
he
could
I
doubt
not
of
the
good
wil
and
desire
of
so
louing
a
friend
)
charge
me
of
any
such
dealing
,
as
is
proued
against
him
in
this
examination
.
First
,
in
his
Preamble
being
Morton
Preamb
.
pag
.
50.
62.
charged
by
a
Catholike
aduersary
to
challenge
(
if
he
could
)
any
one
Catholike
writer
of
this
wickednesse
objected
against
him
,
though
I
was
then
fresh
in
his
memory
,
and
next
at
his
elbow
for
the
bookes
written
betweene
vs
,
yet
he
leaueth
me
quite
out
,
as
freed
from
al
such
accusation
.
Yet
in
the
Preface
Morton
Pref
.
Reply
.
of
his
reply
he
affirmeth
that
I
scarce
examine
one
of
twenty
of
the
testimonies
which
he
bringeth
:
a
foule
fault
,
if
it
were
true
,
and
as
great
a
sinne
and
slaunder
in
D.
Morton
,
if
it
be
false
,
as
al
men
that
euer
did
or
shal
reade
his
positions
and
my
answere
,
wil
presently
pronounce
it
is
.
For
in
his
booke
of
positions
Mort
.
positions
hath
about
90.
citat
.
there
be
not
one
hundred
of
testimonies
alleaged
:
Then
I
haue
not
examined
fiue
,
or
else
the
whetstone
belongeth
to
D.
Morton
.
Which
he
wil
quietly
take
vnto
him
,
because
I
was
so
careful
and
diligent
to
examine
his
authorities
,
that
himselfe
forgetting
himselfe
,
what
he
had
vttered
in
this
place
,
in
the
76.
page
of
the
same
booke
maketh
a
wonder
both
in
Reply
pag
.
76.
wordes
,
and
blanke
space
,
for
a
signe
,
and
in
these
wordes
;
(
what
nothing
?
not
one
word
in
behalfe
of
Pope
Sixtus
?
)
when
I
passed
ouer
to
make
answere
to
a
supposed
oration
of
Sixtus
Quintus
,
for
which
he
bringeth
no
one
authour
,
as
is
euident
in
his
positions
.
Therefore
,
it
is
not
one
in
twenty
testimonies
,
Rom.
posit
.
pag
.
28.
29.
which
I
only
examined
:
but
it
is
oddes
twenty
to
one
,
that
D.
Morton
is
a
corrupt
,
false
,
and
consciencelesse
writer
.
Againe
,
in
an
other
place
of
this
his
reply
,
he
chargeth
me
only
Reply
pag
.
5.
to
answere
Panormitane
,
when
he
alleaged
other
authours
,
and
that
I
had
written
three
vntruthes
:
which
hereaf●er
I
must
put
to
the
number
of
his
corruptions
:
for
the
vntruthes
with
which
he
chargeth
me
,
are
his
owne
false
corruptions
of
my
writing
,
as
I
proue
against
him
at
large
in
their
place
to
be
examined
,
Cap.
11.
infr
.
and
answere
the
other
au●hours
also
cited
with
Panormitane
,
as
wil
and
doth
appeare
in
the
place
following
,
and
my
first
answere
also
in
the
5.
Chapter
thereof
.
And
these
be
al
Moderat
.
answ
.
cap
.
5.
§.
Let
vs
heare
.
the
quarrels
I
finde
him
to
aduaunce
against
me
in
this
kinde
of
contention
:
whereof
hauing
freed
my selfe
and
proued
them
particulars
of
D.
Mortons
corruptions
and
falsyfications
.
I
wil
proceede
to
my
examination
of
his
dealings
as
I
haue
promised
before
:
thinking
it
is
a
new
corruption
in
himselfe
,
if
in
Morton
Preamb
.
cap
.
of
his
stage
.
general
he
speaketh
,
as
though
I
falsyfied
,
when
he
bringeth
no
reason
of
such
conjecture
,
nor
further
in
particular
accuseth
me
.
THE
SIXT
CHAPTER
.
Of
D.
MORTONS
corrupt
dealing
;
in
that
,
not
making
any
mention
at
al
of
more
then
the
fift
part
of
the
Moderate
answere
:
yet
in●●tuleth
his
booke
,
A
ful
satisfaction
.
NOw
M.
Doctor
Morton
,
with
al
your
Protestant
helps
,
fraudes
,
and
friends
,
defend
(
if
you
can
)
your
reply
,
called
by
you
,
A
ful
satisfaction
:
for
I
am
so
farre
from
accepting
it
,
for
a
ful
satisfaction
to
my
answere
,
that
I
say
it
is
no
satisfaction
at
al
,
in
any
true
moral
judgement
:
But
my
answere
and
arguments
stand
stil
to
this
day
,
by
you
vnsatisfied
.
And
that
your
sirnamed
,
A
ful
satisfaction
,
concerning
my
answere
is
rather
a
ful
foolery
,
forgery
,
or
soile
to
you
the
authour
,
or
a
fool●sh
satisfaction
(
one
more
,
or
al
if
you
please
:
)
which
I
wil
presently
proue
.
And
first
concerning
the
Title
of
your
booke
,
(
A
ful
satisfaction
:
)
In
the
very
first
page
and
inscription
thereof
,
it
being
Mortons
reply
in
titul
.
by
you
deuided
into
three
partes
:
you
say
(
to
vse
your
owne
wordes
)
The
two
former
belong
to
the
reply
vpon
the
Moderate
answerer
:
Then
I
demaund
of
you
,
M.
Doctor
Satisfier
,
whether
to
satisfie
an
argument
,
reason
,
booke
,
author
,
aduersary
,
or
opponent
,
is
not
(
at
the
least
)
to
shew
some
insufficiency
,
inualidity
,
or
defect
in
it
,
or
in
any
wise
to
say
somewhat
vnto
them
:
otherwise
they
remaine
both
vnanswered
,
and
vnsatisfied
,
as
also
vntouched
and
vunamed
,
euen
as
they
did
before
:
And
a
ful
satisfaction
must
consequently
,
fully
,
and
to
al
purposes
,
satisfie
:
And
ridiculous
it
were
,
so
to
be
named
,
if
it
performed
no
such
thing
,
otherwise
it
can
not
be
a
ful
,
but
no
satisfaction
:
things
,
for
al
that
,
remaining
as
they
did
before
,
and
wholy
and
fully
vnsatisfied
.
Then
M.
Doctor
,
that
booke
of
mine
which
you
say
is
fully
satisfied
,
consisted
of
foure
partes
:
first
Apologetical
epistic
Moderate
ans
.
epist.
dedic
.
c
.
1.
to
his
Majesty
,
for
the
defence
of
Catholikes
:
secondly
,
a
general
censure
of
your
positions
in
the
first
chapter
,
truly
intituled
(
as
it
did
performe
:
)
A
general
censure
of
this
slander
ous
Cap.
2.
3.
4.
5.
&
Conclus
.
pamphlet
:
prouing
that
no
one
argument
therein
,
can
conclude
the
authours
intent
.
The
third
a
particular
answere
to
your
reasons
;
the
fourth
a
very
long
defensiue
conclusion
:
when
I
had
confuted
your
then
by
me
condemned
(
and
since
by
greater
and
Apolog
,
for
the
oath
.
D.
Barlow
against
a
name
.
Cathol
.
B.
Androwes
.
Doct
.
Field
,
&c.
more
worthy
Protestants
then
yourselfe
)
inuectiue
arguments
.
In
your
(
so
called
)
ful
satisfaction
,
you
haue
not
so
much
as
made
any
mention
at
al
,
of
any
but
the
third
part
,
excepting
that
in
your
Mort
.
reply
epist.
dedicat
.
Epistle
dedicatory
,
you
doe
hystorically
only
,
and
impertinently
relate
six
or
seauen
lines
,
from
one
of
the
other
:
so
that
three
parts
in
your
reply
satisfactory
(
as
pleaseth
you
)
be
not
so
much
as
named
,
or
any
one
thing
in
them
either
satisfied
or
spoken
off
:
And
how
the
other
third
part
is
satisfied
,
and
how
fully
,
you
haue
heard
to
your
shame
already
,
and
by
your
owne
law
&
silence
granted
it
:
and
you
shal
haue
sufficient
satisfaction
hereafter
that
it
is
so
,
whether
we
haue
your
consent
or
no
.
And
although
,
that
third
part
which
among
foure
you
haue
chosen
to
answere
,
and
said
somewhat
vnto
,
is
the
greatest
of
al
,
yet
the
other
being
of
such
consequence
for
Catholikes
,
as
I
haue
shewed
(
and
wil
more
hereafter
appeare
)
and
vtterly
condemning
your
position
,
it
was
neither
ful
satisfying
dealing
,
sincerity
or
integ●ity
,
(
the
coate
which
you
would
giue
)
wholy
and
fully
to
omit
them
.
But
as
I
said
before
,
you
haue
not
so
much
as
spoken
of
the
fift
part
of
my
booke
in
your
denominated
ful
satisfaction
,
which
I
thus
demonstrate
.
There
be
in
that
my
answere
(
thus
careful
I
haue
beene
to
giue
you
satisfaction
)
thirty
leaues
,
cuery
leafe
containing
threescore
&
sixteene
lines
,
except
it
be
interrupted
by
a
smal
space
,
for
the
beginning
of
chapters
or
such
li●e
,
not
frequent
in
that
worke
,
containing
only
eleauen
chap●ers
,
besides
the
Conclusion
and
Epistle
dedicatory
:
so
that
the
number
of
the
lines
amount
vnto
,
about
or
aboue
2000.
And
you
(
M.
Doctor
)
make
shew
vnto
your
reader
as
though
you
doe
&
would
cite
my
very
wordes
,
and
wholy
.
And
yet
of
these
2000.
lines
(
or
more
)
he
doth
not
so
much
as
mention
400.
in
his
whole
booke
,
called
a
ful
satisfaction
.
So
that
by
his
owne
accompt
he
hath
not
either
satisfied
fully
,
or
once
spoken
off
,
more
then
the
fift
part
of
my
booke
.
And
that
he
may
know
I
deale
friendly
,
and
plain●l●
with
him
(
seeking
his
amendment
)
I
haue
taken
paines
to
help
him
,
and
direct
the
reader
(
otherwise
not
worth
labour
)
particularly
to
gather
the
number
of
the
lines
,
which
he
hath
cited
and
where
(
not
exceeding
mine
in
greatnesse
and
number
of
letters
)
to
make
a
perfect
proofe
or
disproofe
of
A
ful
satisfaction
,
(
if
his
reply
were
fully
satisfactory
:
)
which
I
recompt
in
this
order
.
In
his
Epistle
dedicatory
he
reciteth
six
or
seauen
lines
,
In
defence
of
his
first
reason
and
chiefest
(
which
I
examine
)
83.
lines
.
in
the
2.
reason
47.
in
the
third
26.
in
the
fourth
40.
in
the
fift
8.
or
9.
in
the
sixt
47.
in
the
seauenth
13.
in
the
eight
11.
in
the
ninth
26.
in
the
tenth
10.
Then
to
delude
his
reader
he
deuiseth
an
other
part
of
his
booke
,
out
of
al
order
,
by
his
owne
first
writing
,
calling
it
Iustification
of
Protestants
:
(
wherein
what
vile
disloyalties
be
defended
by
this
accuser
of
Catholikes
,
I
leaue
to
others
)
And
in
that
he
citeth
about
one
hundred
.
Al
which
collected
together
(
and
be
al
he
vouchsafeth
to
acquaint
the
world
with
from
my
booke
,
by
such
men
and
their
meanes
suppressed
)
doe
not
make
400.
not
the
fift
of
my
booke
as
is
euident
before
.
Then
no
satisfaction
,
much
lesse
a
ful
satisfaction
.
But
it
is
my
answere
,
and
not
his
reply
,
which
hath
fully
satisfied
,
and
stil
remaineth
by
him
vnsatisfied
,
euen
by
his
owne
judgement
;
except
one
is
more
then
foure
,
or
foure
fewer
then
one
:
though
his
counter-coine
(
as
I
shal
shortly
demonstrate
it
to
be
)
might
passe
for
true
paiment
and
satisfaction
.
And
if
M.
Doctor
could
giue
denial
vnto
this
,
or
with
any
face
before
,
haue
wished
me
to
haue
written
against
his
named
ful
satisfaction
,
he
might
now
doe
wel
(
I
request
him
,
hauing
command
of
print
,
vnto
it
)
to
cause
to
be
printed
,
word
by
word
,
without
any
addition
,
detraction
,
or
alteration
at
al
,
(
as
they
were
published
first
by
him
,
and
me
)
his
positions
;
my
answere
vnto
them
:
and
his
called
ful
satisfaction
,
only
so
much
as
concerneth
my
booke
.
And
let
the
world
judge
,
who
hath
giuen
best
satisfaction
;
I
wish
and
desire
him
to
accept
,
this
disaduantage
(
if
he
dealeth
sincerely
)
vnto
my selfe
.
THE
SEAVENTH
CHAPTER
.
How
D.
MORTON
concealeth
without
any
mention
at
al
,
both
the
oath
of
alleageance
to
Prince
,
and
loue
to
al
Protestant
subiects
,
as
if
they
were
of
our
owne
religion
,
and
as
farre
as
the
law
of
God
,
nature
,
and
would
together
with
a
disputation
,
offered
for
Catholikes
:
and
prouing
them
innocent
.
ANd
M.
Doctor
,
that
it
may
be
manifest
,
I
doe
not
charge
you
for
concealing
and
passing
ouer
,
either
without
satisfaction
or
any
memory
at
al
,
thinges
of
smal
moment
but
of
greatest
consequence
,
and
fully
satisfying
(
because
it
is
your
phrase
)
al
indifferent
mindes
,
both
of
the
sincere
and
loyal
affection
to
Superiours
,
and
holy
Doctrine
in
Catholikes
,
and
falsly
suggested
crimination
of
you
,
against
them
:
I
beseech
you
to
remember
that
your
positions
were
grounded
vpon
supposed
doctrine
,
and
practise
of
Catholikes
denial
,
of
dutiful
alleageance
to
Prince
,
and
yeelding
communications
of
humane
and
ciuil
respects
,
to
Protestant
subjects
in
their
degree
.
And
if
we
graunt
al
these
,
then
al
your
positions
,
reply
,
defence
of
them
,
and
your
baptized
ful
satisfaction
be
out
of
date
.
And
if
you
knew
it
in
your
owne
conscience
,
and
by
testimony
of
your
owne
Protestants
,
and
my
writing
,
and
yet
you
concealed
it
from
the
world
;
as
though
I
had
neuer
written
to
such
purpose
,
and
you
by
that
meanes
perseuered
in
your
former
calumniations
,
(
as
you
did
in
your
reply
)
we
are
to
be
pronounced
innocent
:
and
your selfe
proued
to
be
such
a
man
,
as
I
doe
intitle
you
.
And
that
we
were
thus
innocent
,
and
you
thus
guilty
,
euen
in
your
owne
knowledge
,
thus
I
presume
against
you
;
first
in
that
,
you
know
no
Catholike
teacheth
that
equiuocation
No
Catholike
can
equiuocate
in
any
point
of
religion
,
by
any
Catholike
opinion
.
or
concealed
meaning
,
may
be
vsed
in
matter
of
faith
and
religion
,
such
as
expresse
dogmatical
principles
(
your
first
and
againe
vrged
positions
in
your
judgement
)
are
to
be
esteemed
.
And
to
hold
otherwise
was
the
heretical
excuse
and
practize
of
your
Cranmer
,
as
I
proued
against
you
from
your
friend
Moder
.
answ
.
c
.
equiu
.
and
father
Fox
.
Then
much
lesse
may
any
Catholike
dissemble
,
or
equiu●cate
,
in
oath
in
such
businesse
,
which
you
wel
knew
,
by
the
lamentable
losses
and
extremities
,
of
those
of
our
religion
,
about
the
oath
of
Supremacy
in
late
daies
,
and
later
how
prepared
many
were
in
this
time
of
his
Majesty
in
a
case
not
so
cleare
,
then
in
some
judgements
to
suffer
the
like
,
had
not
his
gratious
Clemency
and
most
honourable
Councel
,
more
pittied
our
distresses
,
then
you
and
such
Teachers
of
Diuinity
had
perswaded
.
Then
hearken
vnto
your
owne
confession
,
concerning
doctrine
:
your
owne
wordes
vnto
me
,
are
these
:
Mortons
reply
pag
.
23.
If
al
your
sect
would
allow
your
answere
,
we
should
neede
no
clamours
.
And
thus
againe
:
But
to
conclude
with
your
owne
wordes
,
Page
14.
those
duties
are
not
to
be
denied
vnto
Protestants
.
It
were
wel
,
if
either
you
writ
,
as
you
thought
,
or
that
your
Doctors
did
thinke
,
as
you
write
:
and
so
should
we
haue
lesse
cause
of
scruples
to
feare
,
either
you
or
them
.
Good
M.
Doctor
hitherto
your
wordes
,
and
I
pray
remember
,
it
is
a
matter
of
religion
,
by
your
owne
confession
,
wherein
you
know
,
I
speake
as
I
thinke
,
and
thinke
as
I
speake
,
and
that
what
I
write
hath
beene
thought
likewise
by
other
our
Doctors
,
euen
from
Rome
it selfe
,
as
your
Preamble
Mitigat
.
Preamble
.
telleth
me
.
The
like
you
haue
heard
often
times
from
your
owne
brethren
in
print
of
late
both
Doctors
with
you
,
and
Bishops
aboue
you
.
Wherefore
,
good
D.
Thomas
,
be
not
you
alone
incredulous
,
but
beleeue
me
.
At
the
least
I
hope
you
wil
be
perswaded
if
you
had
knowne
,
we
would
haue
sworne
as
I
taught
and
writ
.
Then
hearken
againe
what
you
knew
and
concealed
in
my
writing
,
without
ful
satisfaction
:
In
that
dedicatory
Epistle
which
you
wholy
concealed
,
I
offered
,
and
by
warrant
for
al
English
Catholikes
in
these
wordes
:
We
wil
s●eare
,
Moderat
.
answ
.
epist.
dedicat
.
An
oath
of
fidelity
,
&
duty
to
King
,
and
al
Protestant
subjects
,
offered
by
Catholikes
and
concealed
by
D.
Morton
.
protest
,
promise
,
and
performe
to
your
Maiesty
,
whatsoeuer
loyalty
,
obedience
,
and
duty
,
is
due
from
a
subiect
to
his
temporal
Prince
,
by
the
word
of
God
,
law
of
nature
,
or
hath
beene
vsed
by
the
subiects
of
this
Kingdome
,
to
any
your
Pr●genitors
Christian
,
from
the
first
to
the
last
:
Acknowledge
and
render
to
your
honourable
Counsaile
,
and
al
Magistrates
in
ciuil
causes
,
so
much
honour
,
reuerence
,
and
submission
:
And
to
al
other
Protestant
subiects
,
like
amity
,
and
neighbourly
affection
,
as
if
they
were
of
the
same
religion
,
which
we
professe
.
Hitherto
the
oath
of
alleageance
which
I
offered
with
allowance
:
and
it
containeth
the
plaine
contradictory
to
that
which
he
laboured
to
proue
against
vs
:
and
the
same
doctrine
affirmatiue
,
which
he
accepted
before
for
sufficient
,
to
stoppe
his
and
such
mens
feares
,
clamours
,
and
scruples
.
And
promiseth
as
much
,
as
the
law
of
God
,
of
nature
,
and
the
law
of
duty
in
England
allow
,
to
Prince
,
and
al
kinde
of
Protestant
subjects
:
and
as
much
as
to
those
of
our
owne
religion
,
in
those
combinations
,
which
he
slaundered
vs
,
to
deny
to
al
Protestants
.
In
general
he
could
not
,
neither
doth
wish
for
more
:
And
that
we
might
haue
agreed
in
the
particulars
without
such
hisse
,
and
like
exploded
clamours
,
we
offered
euen
in
that
time
of
Parliament
,
Conuocation
,
and
assembly
of
their
best
learned
,
a
conference
and
disputation
to
our
owne
great
inequality
,
and
al
Protestants
ful
satisfaction
,
If
any
thing
wil
satisfie
,
but
those
thinges
,
which
without
sinne
can
neither
be
graunted
of
vs
,
or
desired
of
them
:
and
such
as
must
needes
haue
accorded
this
contention
,
as
I
shal
declare
hereafter
in
this
Chapter
.
What
man
then
,
of
such
sincere
integrity
,
as
this
Doctor
is
,
by
his
owne
writing
,
and
himselfe
commended
,
would
haue
dissembled
and
concealed
offers
,
and
conditions
so
ample
,
general
,
so
confidently
made
,
and
(
himselfe
confessing
it
)
stopping
al
clamours
,
and
quieting
contention
in
so
great
businesse
?
who
would
not
shame
to
perseuer
in
that
,
which
he
knoweth
a
wrong
?
if
my
doctrine
was
so
satisfactory
,
why
was
my
poore
person
so
persecuted
,
and
extraordinarily
searched
for
?
my
bookes
so
pleasing
,
and
ful
of
contentment
,
why
were
they
suppressed
?
why
were
such
proceedings
(
as
stil
are
)
vrged
against
vs
al
by
the
Protestant
Clergy
?
why
did
such
spirits
as
this
,
so
vnnaturally
incense
the
Parliament
against
vs
,
that
the
Protestant
Prelates
made
res●stance
,
as
Protestants
themselues
haue
published
.
The
wordes
of
the
Protestant
Authours
,
of
A
Christian
and
modest
offer
,
in
that
respect
,
are
these
.
Resistance
was
made
to
the
lawes
intended
Christian
and
modest
offer
,
pag
.
15.
to
haue
beene
made
against
the
Papists
,
especially
by
some
and
those
not
the
meanest
of
the
Prelates
.
Whereby
M.
Morton
may
see
diuers
things
,
in
his
owne
judgement
against
himselfe
:
first
,
that
Catholike
Priests
neither
deserue
their
clamours
,
nor
persecutions
:
secondly
,
how
vnjustly
he
hath
behaued
himself
,
as
wel
in
concealing
from
his
readers
,
that
which
excuseth
them
for
innocent
,
as
in
so
passionate
inuectiues
against
them
,
whom
he
thus
esteemeth
and
findeth
guiltlesse
:
thirdly
,
how
religiously
and
charitably
his
fellowes
in
profession
vrged
such
lawes
and
proceedings
against
vs
,
and
many
(
by
his
owne
confession
vnjustly
)
and
stil
prosecute
,
which
some
of
their
owne
Protetestant
Prelates
are
ashamed
off
,
made
resistance
against
.
And
because
M.
Morton
is
a
great
man
,
and
Doctor
in
his
religion
,
let
me
further
conferre
with
him
in
this
matter
of
so
great
moment
:
Sir
,
your
calling
doth
or
should
vnderstand
,
that
although
there
is
not
euidence
in
faith
,
yet
for
the
reuelation
from
God
,
in
which
it
is
founded
,
it
is
called
(
and
so
is
)
the
greatest
certainty
,
then
men
which
may
not
Mortonize
,
and
haue
no
certainty
of
faith
,
cannot
easily
be
remoued
in
judgement
in
such
thinges
:
and
to
seeke
the
contrary
by
compulsion
,
without
instruction
,
is
but
tiranny
,
as
(
if
you
were
present
)
you
heard
preached
before
the
King
,
by
the
then
Bishop
Bish
.
of
Durh
.
Sermon
.
19.
of
March
,
1603.
of
Durham
,
the
19.
day
of
March
in
the
yeare
1603.
or
if
you
were
absent
,
I
doubt
not
but
you
haue
heard
,
or
read
,
his
Majesties
speach
in
Parliament
,
the
same
day
,
where
he
citeth
and
Kinges
speach
in
Parliament
,
1603.
commendeth
the
same
sentence
:
his
regal
wordes
are
these
:
For
as
you
my
Lord
of
Durham
,
said
very
learnedly
to
day
in
your
sermon
,
correction
without
instruction
is
but
tiranny
.
And
a
litle
before
he
perswadeth
vs
thus
:
to
be
studious
to
reade
and
conferre
with
learned
men
:
by
which
hee
meaneth
the
learned
Protestants
.
Then
M.
Doctor
,
I
suppose
you
haue
seene
it
lately
proued
,
Protest
.
proofs
cap
.
6.
8.
forth
of
your
owne
bretheren
of
England
,
which
haue
written
since
his
Majesties
entrance
,
and
your selfe
for
one
,
that
you
Protestants
in
England
haue
not
yet
resolued
anything
in
matters
of
faith
,
which
is
infallibly
certaine
,
(
as
faith
must
be
)
neither
by
your
proceedings
haue
you
any
such
rule
in
religion
,
to
resolue
it
by
,
or
to
binde
others
to
receaue
it
,
as
D.
Field
writeth
,
Field
pag
.
226.
228.
and
your selfe
is
not
of
other
minde
,
when
you
know
that
matters
of
question
in
religion
(
where
agreement
cannot
be
had
)
are
to
be
de●ided
by
the
highest
judge
;
otherwise
appeales
may
stil
be
,
and
no
end
of
controuersies
:
And
yet
you
Morton
part
.
2.
Apolog
.
Epist.
dedicat
.
in
Argument
.
l.
4.
&
cap
.
18.
l.
4.
write
of
the
King
,
that
he
is
not
.
Supremus
Iudex
,
the
highest
Iudge
,
But
Concilium
publicum
,
a
general
Council
;
●here
among
your
9.
conditions
,
you
finde
no
place
for
him
,
a●d
yet
you
say
,
Quiuis
docti
Theol●gi
v●ces
decisinas
habent
:
al
learned
Diuines
haue
deciding
voices
in
it
.
And
your
Relator
of
religion
Relat
.
of
relig
.
cap
.
47.
putteth
you
out
of
hope
.
But
to
follow
your
doctrine
:
then
before
Catholikes
can
be
condemned
,
you
must
haue
some
such
inuincible
and
highest
argument
against
them
.
And
if
quiuis
docti
Theologi
,
al
learned
Diuines
haue
,
or
must
haue
v●ices
,
in
this
decision
;
I
trust
neither
you
nor
any
Protestant
is
of
mind
,
but
some
Catholike
D●uines
(
euen
of
England
)
in
al
this
your
time
of
Protestancy
,
are
in
this
number
,
and
must
be
acquainted
with
such
proceedings
,
and
present
at
them
by
your
j●dgement
.
And
to
proue
,
that
the
Priests
of
England
haue
not
beene
vnwilling
,
with
a
l●sse
trial
,
then
your selfe
only
approue
for
Iuridical
;
And
you
knew
this
▪
and
yet
both
concealed
it
,
and
against
your
owne
doctrine
,
so
inj●riously
proceeded
:
Hearke
M.
Doctor
,
what
I
first
wrote
in
this
matter
,
and
you
remembred
it
not
:
my
wordes
in
the
Epistle
of
my
answere
be
these
:
We
haue
of●en
,
earnestly
,
and
by
al
meanes
we
could
,
desired
to
Moderat
.
answ
.
Epi●t
.
dedicat
.
§.
this
is
.
haue
a
trial
graunted
,
with
equal
conditions
,
against
the
most
selected
and
best
learned
Doctors
of
that
(
Protestant
)
religion
.
If
you
think●
not
this
plaine
dealing
in
our
behalfe
,
then
let
me
take
witnesse
of
your
owne
Protestants
,
the
Authours
of
the
cited
offer
of
conference
,
which
after
offer
made
with
equal
conditions
,
conclude
for
vs
in
these
wordes
.
There
is
such
indifferency
Offer
of
confer
.
pag
.
3.
4.
5.
6.
pag
.
11.
in
this
offer
,
and
it
standeth
vpon
so
iu●t
and
equal
groundes
,
that
it
ought
not
to
be
refused
of
any
Christians
,
no
though
made
by
Iewes
,
Turkes
,
Arrians
,
Papists
,
or
any
other
Heretikes
,
whatsoeuer
.
Then
M.
Doctor
if
disputation
is
so
necessary
,
without
our
c●nuiction
in
it
,
w●
cannot
by
your
owne
sentence
be
condemned
,
and
by
your
Protestants
j●dgement
it
ought
not
to
be
refused
vpon
equal
groundes
:
how
much
lesse
ought
an
offer
vpon
vnequal
groundes
for
Papists
,
made
to
a
whole
Parliament
,
and
Conuocation
of
Protestant
Doctors
,
and
to
their
great
aduantage
,
be
either
denied
or
so
concealed
,
as
your
The
offer
of
disputation
made
for
Catholikes
in
the
time
of
the
last
Parliament
,
concealed
by
D.
Morton
.
learned
sincerity
hath
done
:
And
yet
injuriously
consented
vnto
,
and
incensed
persecution
against
vs.
Wherefore
hearken
to
the
offer
I
made
,
and
you
concealed
:
it
followeth
immediately
in
my
answere
to
the
wordes
last
cited
;
And
is
word
for
word
as
here
ensueth
.
And
at
this
present
,
when
your
chiefest
Protestant
Clergie
Moderat
.
answ
.
Epist.
dedicat
.
§.
And
at
.
(
Bishops
and
others
)
is
ass●mbled
,
we
most
humbly
entreate
,
this
so
reasonable
a
Placet
,
that
although
they
wil
not
(
as
we
feare
)
easily
consent
to
an
indifferent
choice
,
opp●sition
and
defence
in
questions
:
yet
,
at
the
least
(
to
auoide
the
wonder
of
the
world
)
they
●il
be
content
,
that
we
may
haue
publike
audience
for
those
articles
,
opinions
,
and
practise
,
for
which
we
are
so
much
condemned
and
persecuted
.
If
we
shal
not
be
able
to
defend
or
proue
,
any
position
generally
maintained
in
our
doctrine
,
to
be
conformable
to
those
rules
in
Diuinity
,
which
your
Maiesty
and
the
Protestant
la●es
of
England
(
we
can
offer
no
more
)
haue
confirmed
for
holy
the
Canonical
Scriptures
,
the
first
general
Councels
,
the
daies
of
Constantine
,
and
the
primatiue
Church
:
Let
the
penalties
be
imposed
and
executed
against
vs.
If
we
performe
it
,
or
this
Petition
may
not
be
admitted
,
we
trust
that
both
our
office
to
God
,
and
duty
to
Prince
,
is
discharged
in
this
point
.
Hitherto
the
wordes
of
that
offer
in
my
Epistle
dedicatory
,
and
by
my
aduersary
D.
Morton
omitted
,
without
any
mention
at
al.
Wherefore
as
we
may
see
both
the
integrity
and
valour
of
this
great
champion
,
by
hiding
his
head
for
such
a
combate
;
So
I
trust
al
men
of
judgement
wil
make
construction
with
this
equity
,
that
they
which
offered
so
publike
a
trial
,
and
at
such
a
time
of
Conuocation
and
Parliament
,
and
the
greatest
assembly
of
Protestant
Bishops
and
Doctors
,
and
to
them
al
,
by
their
owne
groundes
,
and
for
those
articles
,
opinions
,
and
practise
,
for
which
we
are
so
much
condemned
and
persecuted
,
are
in
al
moral
and
probable
sentence
,
men
innocent
,
and
vnjustly
accused
by
such
Positioners
.
And
I
hope
Master
Doctor
,
that
you
wil
not
hereafter
,
nor
did
not
truly
and
with
discretion
say
,
that
my selfe
which
made
this
offer
,
and
was
assigned
to
be
one
of
the
three
Catholike
disputants
to
performe
it
,
against
you
al
(
for
as
some
of
your
side
gaue
hope
of
disputation
,
so
we
did
not
muster
multitudes
against
you
)
and
remained
in
London
to
my
great
hazard
among
your
searches
for
me
,
either
feared
scratching
or
biting
of
you
,
or
your
best
biting
dogges
.
THE
EIGHT
CHAPTER
OR
ACT
.
Wherein
D.
MORTON
is
conuinced
further
,
to
haue
omitted
a
whole
Chapter
of
the
Moderate
answere
,
in
which
manifest
demonstration
was
made
,
that
no
one
of
al
his
arguments
could
conclude
his
intent
and
promise
.
ENter
againe
M.
Doctor
,
and
excuse
your selfe
if
you
can
,
why
the
very
first
Chapter
of
my
answere
being
intituled
,
(
A
general
censure
of
this
slaunderous
pamphlet
:
prouing
,
that
no
one
argument
therein
can
conclude
the
authours
intent
)
is
quite
omitted
,
without
any
memory
at
al
,
in
that
your
stiled
ful
satisfaction
.
Sir
tel
me
;
was
this
integrity
?
was
it
sincere
dealing
,
whereupon
you
stand
so
much
?
was
I
so
idle
a
disputer
,
to
giue
so
glorious
a
name
to
a
Treatise
,
and
proue
nothing
in
it
?
I
doubt
not
,
but
the
world
thinketh
your
memory
,
or
your
friendes
would
haue
put
you
in
minde
of
such
an
aduantage
,
to
haue
cried
a
victory
,
if
my
mistaking
had
beene
so
great
.
But
whether
I
proued
so
much
or
no
;
yet
seing
,
I
contented
therein
(
as
the
Title
testifieth
)
to
stoppe
your
course
at
the
first
entrance
,
by
ouerthrowing
that
foundation
,
whereupon
you
had
hazarded
al
;
and
in
denying
those
to
be
dogmatical
principles
with
vs
,
which
you
stiled
for
such
,
and
deduced
conclusions
from
them
(
in
your
minde
or
wordes
)
infallible
,
you
should
haue
said
some-what
against
me
:
and
in
omitting
it
,
you
both
graunt
your
errour
,
and
this
notwithstanding
persisting
in
your
slaunders
,
detect
your
malice
.
But
you
knew
wel
,
and
could
not
but
know
,
that
(
according
Moderate
a●swere
,
cap
.
1.
to
the
Title
of
that
Chapter
)
I
proued
so
much
by
diuers
reasons
,
as
is
manifest
in
that
place
of
my
answere
,
which
for
breuity
,
and
to
auoide
repetitions
,
I
must
passe
ouer
at
this
time
,
and
leaue
them
to
the
reader
to
be
considered
in
the
place
remembred
,
and
vrge
against
you
,
but
one
only
argument
there
insinuated
:
and
yet
d●monstratiuely
proue
the
Title
of
that
Chapter
,
and
vtterly
ouerthrow
both
D.
Mortons
whole
booke
of
positions
,
and
his
conceited
Satisfaction
●n
defence
thereof
.
§
.
Then
M.
Doctor
,
thus
I
must
pu●
you
in
minde
,
that
your
firs●
booke
is
entituled
,
An
exact
discouery
of
Romish
doctrine
,
D.
Mortons
R●mish
po●●tions
in
titul
.
in
the
case
of
conspiracy
and
rebellion
.
By
●hich
we
are
giuen
to
vnderstand
,
that
in
your
judgement
this
your
worke
is
perfect
and
absolute
in
this
kinde
,
otherwise
the
names
Disc●uery
and
Exact
cannot
be
truly
app●ied
vnto
it
,
so
that
what
you
haue
done
in
this
businesse
was
such
,
that
additions
and
amplifications
neede
not
to
be
annexed
vnto
it
:
And
the●efore
●ou
adde
in
these
wordes
:
that
it
is
coll●cted
out
of
the
expresse
d●gmatical
Supr
.
in
titul
.
principles
of
Popish
Priests
and
Doctors
.
And
hereupon
in
your
ten
pa●ticular
Syllogismes
,
you
propose
these
general
propositions
.
But
al
Popish
Priests
doe
hold
and
practise
this
,
and
that
:
ergo
.
al
Popish
Priests
,
&c.
is
that
which
you
would
conclude
:
Romish
posit
.
reas
.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
&c.
as
appeareth
by
your
general
conclusions
in
those
your
positions
.
Now
learned
M.
Doctor
,
men
vnder
your
degree
and
euery
young
Sch●ller
doth
kn●w
,
that
in
al
Arts
and
Sciences
,
those
be
Principles
,
w●i●h
be
so
cleare
,
and
generally
graunted
of
al
,
that
it
is
so
absurd
a
t●i●g
for
a
man
●o
den●
them
,
that
the
Philosopher
telleth
vs
▪
Contran●ga●tem
principia
non
est
disputa●dum
,
there
i●
no
disputing
against
him
●hich
denieth
the
principles
:
but
he
is
to
be
beaten
●ith
clubbes
,
and
not
vrged
by
reason
.
Much
more
,
●●
they
be
so
manifest
,
to
be
such
principles
,
that
they
deserue
by
the
c●mmon
knowledge
,
which
is
had
of
them
,
to
be
called
either
expr●sse
principles
,
or
dogmatical
principles
;
for
by
such
epithers
,
or
names
,
they
are
denounced
to
be
plainly
expressed
,
declared
,
and
sentenced
to
be
such
.
And
yet
for
failing
,
you
joyne
altogether
,
and
say
they
be
the
expresse
,
d●gmatical
principles
,
of
Popish
Priests
and
Doctors
.
And
so
they
had
neede
,
which
inferre
your
general
positions
or
conclusions
,
al
Priests
and
al
Popish
Priests
,
&c.
Now
most
sincere
and
learned
disputer
,
I
affirme
against
you
(
and
wil
presently
so
demonstrate
)
that
in
your
whole
booke
you
doe
not
proue
one
position
,
which
you
bring
to
be
a
principle
,
much
lesse
an
expresse
dogmatical
principle
.
Then
your
ten
seueral
general
conclusions
must
be
deduced
from
no
principle
at
al
(
a
thing
in
true
reasoning
and
concluding
vnpossible
)
or
else
your
whole
booke
and
defen●e
thereof
is
a
forgery
,
a
shamelesse
lie
,
foolish
fiction
,
more
then
satis
,
and
no
ful
satisfaction
.
And
that
I
doe
not
fully
satisfie
herein
,
after
your
manner
I
D.
Mortons
p●sitions
proued
slaunders
,
by
great
Protestant●
,
and
him
s●lfe
al●o
.
cou●d
bring
greater
Protestant
witnesse
,
and
you
your selfe
for
testimony
also
in
this
b●sinesse
:
for
first
you
know
wel
(
though
Rom.
posit
.
in
Prefat
.
you
say
you
writ
by
direction
,
or
not
without
direction
of
Superiours
)
that
in
the
Protestant
booke
called
Apol
.
pag
.
52.
pag
.
28
pag
.
77.
pag
.
4.
pa.
8.
Apology
,
published
authoritate
Regia
,
the
quite
contradictory
to
your
slaunderous
conclusions
(
I
hope
with
as
great
warrant
as
you
had
)
is
contained
in
many
places
on
the
behalfe
of
Catholikes
,
Priests
,
and
the●
religion
,
and
much
more
then
is
required
to
your
consutation
:
where
you
are
expresly
told
,
that
you
and
men
of
your
opinion
(
if
any
more
can
be
found
)
are
slaunderers
.
The
like
you
may
learne
from
other
bookes
of
that
kinde
since
,
both
by
Bish
.
Ba●low
.
B.
Androw●
,
&c
Bishops
among
you
,
and
of
higher
place
.
And
before
them
or
their
question
handled
from
D.
Field
,
in
his
Adjections
to
his
Field
l.
3.
pag
.
21.
22.
23.
cap
.
17.
third
booke
of
the
Church
.
And
although
these
were
written
since
your
golden
workes
of
Positions
and
Satisfaction
:
yet
you
cannot
excuse
your selfe
,
knowing
that
your
opinion
was
den●unced
an
errour
by
his
Majesties
publike
pr●clamation
,
before
Procl●m
.
against
the
late
conspi●acy
.
it
was
written
:
therefore
except
you
haue
a
supercathedrical
command
,
as
wel
ouer
the
proclamations
and
edict
of
Princes
,
as
you
haue
challenged
before
ouer
their
p●rsons
and
Enthronings
,
you
might
haue
suppressed
your
spirit
.
Secondly
,
M.
Doctor
●ourselfe
hath
condemned
your selfe
,
in
those
vile
and
slaunderous
assertions
:
for
as
before
you
haue
freed
al
of
my
opinion
in
my
answere
▪
so
confirmed
as
before
.
Againe
,
in
your
Rom.
posit
.
p●g
.
●1
.
positions
themselues
you
except
many
Priests
,
and
yet
in
the
Rom.
posit
.
●at
.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
&c.
same
you
conclude
with
open
mouth
●ften
times
,
Al
Priests
are
Traitors
.
And
in
your
P●eamble
since
,
you
write
thus
againe
:
Diuers
of
the
zealous
among
vs
Preamble
,
pag
.
36.
&
in
merg
.
Romish
Professors
doe
abhorre
such
doctrines
and
practizes
,
as
your
positions
charge
al
Priests
withal
.
And
now
thirdly
,
M.
Doctor
,
thus
I
dispute
against
your
D.
Morton
his
dogmatical
principles
demon●tratiuely
ouerthrowne
.
expresse
dogmatical
principles
,
as
you
cal
them
:
you
make
your
first
Syllogisme
the
ground
of
al
your
booke
;
And
yet
in
that
you
Morton
positions
,
pag
.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
cite
(
and
about
diuers
matters
)
only
these
authorities
;
Andreas
Iurgiwicius
,
M.
Reinalds
,
D.
Gifford
,
Possiuinus
a
Iesuite
,
Cardinal
Allen
,
Father
Parsons
,
M.
Thomas
Wright
,
Simancha
,
Lod●uicus
de
Orleance
,
lib
.
de
Abdicat
.
Henr
.
3.
Polydore
,
and
three
Glosses
from
Gratian
:
and
not
any
other
,
and
these
be
cited
for
diuers
and
distinct
thinges
:
Then
M.
Morton
,
where
is
the
expresse
dogmatical
principle
,
whereupon
not
only
your
ergo
and
conclusion
of
that
Syllogisme
,
but
your
whole
Treatise
is
founded
?
for
here
neither
is
expresse
,
nor
impresse
principle
,
dogma
or
dogmatical
,
as
you
haue
promised
vs
;
except
priuate
men
of
diuers
questions
,
can
giue
this
Title
,
which
you
dare
not
for
further
shame
affirme
.
Fourthly
,
tel
me
M.
Doctor
,
in
what
page
,
line
,
or
chapter
of
your
booke
,
doe
you
once
proue
,
that
any
one
authority
you
vse
is
defined
,
decreed
,
or
receaued
as
a
matter
of
faith
,
dogmatical
principle
,
expresly
or
impresly
;
I
haue
pervsed
your
booke
,
yet
I
finde
no
such
probation
,
then
it
is
not
your
denomination
extrinsecal
,
or
intituling
your
booke
,
which
can
make
expresse
dogmatical
principles
,
and
so
many
as
you
neede
in
that
Treatise
,
for
ten
general
conclusions
.
§
.
Fiftly
,
M.
Doctor
,
suppose
he
should
be
(
according
to
Doctor
Fields
opinion
of
them
of
Paris
)
a
Sorbonist
or
Parisian
D.
Field
Adject
.
to
hi●
3.
booke
pag
.
21.
Diuine
(
though
I
am
not
)
which
disputeth
against
you
;
(
for
many
hundred
such
be
learned
Priests
or
Doctors
)
Then
tel
me
,
what
one
authority
in
al
your
booke
there
is
,
which
hath
the
least
colour
to
be
called
an
expresse
dogmatical
principle
?
There
be
in
your
booke
about
90.
authorities
cited
,
among
which
there
is
neither
general
Councel
,
nor
prouincial
Councel
,
confirmed
,
or
not
confirmed
,
alleaged
but
only
priuate
writers
,
the
authorities
of
some
matters
of
fact
,
of
not
aboue
fiue
or
six
Popes
at
the
most
,
Gregory
VII
.
Gregory
IX
.
Pius
V.
Zistu●
V.
neuer
vrged
as
definitions
or
matters
of
faith
;
And
yet
among
these
the
chiefest
cited
by
you
as
from
Gregory
IX
.
is
counterfaite
or
mistaken
at
the
least
by
your
owne
confession
,
in
your
reply
.
And
of
al
the
rest
you
Mortons
reply
pag
.
48.
49.
labour
not
to
proue
any
one
to
be
a
dogmatical
principle
,
in
that
common
Catholike
opinion
which
holdeth
that
the
definition
of
a
Pope
in
matter
of
doctrine
is
a
declaration
of
faith
.
Then
if
you
are
so
farre
wide
,
that
in
your
whole
discourse
of
ten
seueral
conclusions
,
to
be
deduced
from
expresse
dogmatical
principles
,
as
you
promised
,
there
is
not
by
the
probable
opinion
of
any
Diuines
,
any
one
such
principle
:
how
much
more
haue
you
gone
astray
by
the
sentence
of
these
Catholike
Doctors
,
Gerson
,
Almaine
,
Occhum
,
Adrianus
sextus
,
Durandus
,
Alphonsus
a
Castro
and
most
of
the
Sorbonists
,
learned
Doctors
and
Priests
of
the
Roman
Church
?
which
would
take
exception
to
this
writing
,
in
more
●ample
manner
,
as
your
friend
D.
Field
hath
witnessed
.
Then
in
what
state
Field
supr
.
of
credit
and
reputation
are
those
poore
ten
naked
conclusions
,
standing
alone
vpon
the
word
of
so
recalling
,
recanting
,
and
contradictory
Doctors
.
Alas
,
alas
,
to
you
poore
conclusions
;
for
your
Master
Morton
learned
in
Cambridge
long
agone
,
when
he
was
but
a
fresh
man
(
scarcely
salted
and
wel
seasoned
with
good
sincere
dealing
yet
)
and
studied
Iacke
Seatons
(
so
called
there
)
Logicke
,
that
Conclusio
semper
sequitur
debiliorem
partem
:
The
conclusion
alwaies
followeth
the
weaker
part
;
in
negation
,
particularity
,
falshood
,
&c.
For
being
deduced
and
drawne
from
(
and
in
a
manner
th●ough
)
both
the
premisses
,
it
must
needes
participate
of
the
defect
which
is
in
any
of
them
,
such
worthinesse
and
security
we
finde
in
these
Oracles
of
D.
Morton
.
THE
NINTH
CHAPTER
.
Of
D.
MORTONS
corruption
,
and
fals●fication
of
his
aduersaries
writing
,
in
particular
:
wherein
is
begunne
to
be
proued
in
order
(
as
before
is
promised
)
that
in
euery
citation
without
exception
,
he
corrupteth
,
or
falsyfieth
his
answerer
:
so
farre
as
is
examined
.
THus
I
haue
hitherto
made
euident
demonstration
in
general
,
so
farre
as
is
necessary
for
me
to
examine
without
entring
into
the
quarrel
of
others
(
which
I
neede
not
to
doe
)
that
D.
Morton
his
bookes
of
Romish
positions
and
ful
satisfaction
,
are
in
al
probable
and
reasonable
j●dgement
(
euen
of
Protestants
themselues
)
a
meere
slaunder
▪
forgery
,
or
corruption
of
a
wicked
irreligious
,
or
vnlearned
writer
,
vtterly
vnworthy
hereafter
either
to
be
beleeued
by
Protestant
,
or
confuted
by
Catholike
.
Now
I
wil
make
this
matter
more
plaine
in
particular
,
and
yet
follow
so
friendly
a
course
also
in
this
combat
,
that
I
intend
only
to
take
the
leauings
of
his
Roman
aduersary
,
and
not
burden
D.
Morton
with
any
thing
,
he
chargeth
him
with
al
,
nor
to
take
so
large
a
scope
,
as
to
examine
his
whole
bookes
,
or
any
great
part
of
any
one
of
them
,
to
reckon
his
corruptions
and
vnconscionable
dealings
,
which
would
make
a
volume
too
large
,
of
so
base
a
businesse
,
as
a
Protestant
Doctors
falshoods
,
and
too
distastful
to
so
chiefe
a
champion
,
and
learned
Doctor
.
Therefore
I
haue
determined
(
as
I
said
before
)
only
to
ex●mine
the
first
portion
,
of
his
ful
satisfaction
,
or
reply
vnto
m●
answere
,
in
the
first
Syllogisme
of
his
positions
,
and
no
further
:
And
this
also
with
such
restriction
and
moderation
,
to
my
owne
losse
,
and
my
aduersaries
aduantage
(
if
by
any
possible
meanes
he
could
cleare
himselfe
)
that
I
wil
passe
ouer
al
other
his
citations
and
authorities
,
not
so
easie
for
euery
reader
to
consider
and
discusse
,
and
touch
only
his
false
allegations
,
corruptions
,
and
alterations
,
of
my
answere
,
in
one
only
chapter
of
my
booke
:
And
yet
I
am
bold
to
pronounce
D.
Morton
(
which
I
wil
presently
proue
to
his
shame
and
confusion
)
to
be
a
wilful
,
dissolute
,
false
alleager
,
corrupter
,
and
deprauer
:
or
else
a
man
grosly
ignorant
,
vnlearned
,
and
forgetful
in
so
high
degree
,
that
he
is
vtterly
vnworthy
to
write
of
diuine
matters
,
to
be
credited
in
his
Assertions
,
or
to
receaue
any
further
answere
hereafter
.
For
proofe
whereof
,
in
his
reply
to
my
second
chapter
mentioned
before
(
for
the
first
as
I
haue
declared
,
he
neuer
mentioneth
)
thus
he
behaueth
himselfe
:
There
be
in
that
chapter
255.
lines
,
and
he
proposing
this
to
be
his
methode
,
to
cite
my
writing
,
word
for
word
,
as
he
would
perswade
his
reader
,
by
the
manner
of
his
proceedings
,
maketh
but
83.
lines
by
his
citation
,
and
yet
they
doe
not
exceede
in
number
of
characters
,
those
which
be
in
my
answere
,
both
this
and
his
reply
being
printed
in
quarto
,
and
yet
sometimes
he
citeth
one
thing
twice
,
as
the
first
and
sixt
chapter
of
his
booke
doe
witnesse
in
this
question
:
Reply
cap
.
1.
6.
pag
.
1.
14.
So
that
before
I
complaine
further
,
first
he
hath
not
cited
or
handled
the
third
part
of
my
answere
,
to
that
his
Reason
or
Syllogisme
.
Secondly
,
citing
my
answere
in
this
chapter
in
14
seueral
citations
,
he
citeth
not
any
one
of
them
al
without
corruption
,
or
falsyfication
,
more
or
lesse
,
which
wil
fully
satisfie
,
that
his
sirnamed
ful
satisfaction
is
,
as
I
haue
tearmed
it
,
and
himselfe
that
man
which
I
haue
promised
to
proue
him
.
And
this
I
demonstrate
by
induction
and
particular
conuiction
of
euery
one
of
these
his
citations
,
diuers
containing
many
corruptions
.
And
thus
I
proceede
in
examining
his
first
citation
,
in
the
first
chapter
of
his
reply
:
At
the
first
beginning
he
misquote●h
the
Reply
pag
.
1.
place
of
my
answere
,
citing
the
second
section
where
there
is
no
such
thing
,
as
he
citeth
of
the
consequence
.
Secondly
,
he
quite
dissembleth
the
question
,
which
was
betweene
him
and
me
set
downe
in
his
positions
,
and
so
recited
in
my
answere
,
in
Romish
posit
.
pag
.
1.
Moderat
.
answere
cap
.
2.
§.
I
wil
.
these
wordes
:
Their
general
assumption
whereupon
al
their
rebellious
positions
are
founded
,
is
this
,
that
al
Protestants
are
Heretikes
,
and
excommunicate
.
And
to
declare
of
what
kinde
of
Heretikes
and
excommunicate
,
lie
disputed
,
thus
he
interpreteth
himselfe
,
in
the
next
wordes
,
Heretikes
so
odious
as
vn●orthy
R●mish
posit
.
1.
Rea●
.
of
any
ciuil
or
natural
society
:
And
of
such
Heretikes
was
our
question
.
Now
in
this
place
of
his
reply
,
he
changeth
the
controuersie
,
and
citeth
me
disputing
only
against
this
naked
proposition
,
Al
Protestants
in
the
censure
of
Catholikes
are
Reply
supr
.
pag
.
1.
Heretikes
,
and
excommunicate
.
Absolutely
concealing
,
of
what
Heretikes
,
denounced
or
not
denounced
,
as
also
of
what
excommunication
we
entreated
.
And
not
content
with
this
,
he
maketh
no
answere
at
al
to
my
confutation
of
that
,
which
he
made
the
ground
of
al
,
and
so
at
his
first
entrance
his
positions
and
expresse
dogmatical
principles
be
ouerthrowne
.
In
his
reply
to
my
second
citation
,
he
alleageth
me
vsing
these
wordes
:
No
Papist
doth
iudge
any
Protestant
an
Heretike
Reply
pag
.
2.
§.
what
is
.
or
excommunicate
.
Where
we
see
he
hath
changed
the
nature
of
the
question
againe
,
from
a
conjunctiue
proposition
(
Protestants
are
Heretikes
and
excommunicate
)
which
himselfe
vseth
before
,
and
to
which
,
and
no
other
I
answered
,
into
a
disiunctiue
proposition
(
Heretike
or
excommunicate
:
)
betweene
which
there
is
so
great
difference
,
that
the
first
is
not
true
,
except
both
parts
be
true
,
the
second
is
true
,
if
one
part
only
be
such
:
as
appeareth
in
these
propositions
:
Thomas
Morton
is
a
Protestant
Doctor
,
and
a
corrupt
writer
:
Thomas
Morton
is
a
Protestant
Doctor
,
or
a
corrupt
writer
.
The
latter
proposition
being
a
disiunctiue
is
true
,
if
M.
Morton
were
free
from
corruption
in
writing
,
because
he
is
knowne
to
be
a
Protestant
Doctor
,
and
the
disiunctiue
proposition
did
not
affirme
both
,
but
the
one
,
or
other
.
The
first
proposition
conjunctiue
and
copalatiue
affirming
both
,
the
one
and
the
other
,
is
not
true
,
except
both
parts
,
that
is
,
that
Thomas
Morton
is
a
Protestant
Doctor
(
which
England
wel
knoweth
)
and
a
corrupt
writer
,
be
true
,
which
I
haue
sufficiently
proued
.
There
be
also
other
corrupt●ons
in
M.
Doctors
citation
,
for
(
as
before
)
he
citeth
me
for
this
proposition
:
No
Papist
doth
Reply
supr
.
pag
.
2.
iudge
any
Protestant
an
Heretike
,
or
excommunicate
.
When
first
,
I
doe
not
exclude
al
Catholikes
in
general
,
by
the
name
Answere
cap
.
2.
§.
wherefore
.
of
no
Papist
,
or
any
thing
equiualent
to
a
general
proposition
,
but
speake
only
of
the
learned
Catholikes
in
this
Kingdome
,
which
be
my
wordes
:
which
he
corruptly
turneth
into
the
recited
(
no
Papist
)
without
limitation
of
Country
,
learning
,
state
,
time
,
place
,
&c.
The
next
corruption
in
this
citation
is
,
that
he
chargeth
me
to
say
,
that
not
any
Protestant
is
iudged
by
vs
an
Heretike
,
&
when
this
restriction
or
limitation
(
any
)
which
altereth
the
sence
,
and
truth
of
the
proposition
,
is
his
corruption
,
making
that
a
particular
,
which
in
our
question
was
general
:
as
appeareth
both
in
his
positions
and
my
answere
,
where
Romish
posit
.
page
1.
Moderat
.
answ
.
cap
.
2.
§.
1.
2.
the
proposition
is
this
:
Al
Protestants
are
Heretikes
and
excommunicate
.
And
yet
we
dispute
of
denounced
Heretikes
and
subject
to
the
penalties
of
the
Canons
,
and
not
of
al
kinde
of
Heretikes
,
as
he
pretendeth
.
And
yet
againe
,
in
the
same
page
of
his
booke
,
he
citeth
my
Reply
pag
.
2.
§.
I
suppose
.
wordes
indefinitely
without
either
general
or
particular
signe
,
that
the
Catholikes
of
this
Kingdome
wil
not
defend
this
opinion
,
that
Protestants
are
Heretikes
and
excommunicate
.
Where
besides
his
different
citation
,
touched
,
he
againe
confoundeth
himselfe
,
first
in
shewing
we
contended
of
a
copulatiue
proposition
(
Heretikes
and
excommunicate
)
which
he
before
hath
chopped
into
a
disiunctiue
(
Heretikes
or
excommunicate
.
)
And
Romish
posit
.
pag
▪
1.
Moderate
answere
cap
.
2.
here
also
he
dissembleth
the
state
of
the
controuersie
,
which
was
of
Heretikes
subject
to
the
penalties
pretended
by
him
,
and
not
of
Heretikes
absolutely
without
that
addition
.
By
such
sincerity
and
integrity
as
D.
Mortons
is
,
a
man
may
proue
any
thing
,
and
disproue
whatsoeuer
,
when
the
aduersary
and
his
booke
be
absent
.
THE
TENTH
CHAPTER
.
Of
D.
MORTONS
corruptions
,
shiftings
,
and
vnlearned
dealings
in
his
next
citation
.
MAster
Doctors
second
and
next
chapter
,
is
thus
intituled
:
Chap.
2.
Containing
fiue
of
the
arguments
of
the
Moderate
Reply
cap
.
2.
pag
.
2.
answerer
.
And
why
Sir
I
pray
you
,
should
it
not
in
true
dealing
haue
contained
8.
arguments
?
(
if
you
so
tearme
them
)
for
so
many
be
vsed
in
my
answere
:
only
with
caueate
for
the
printers
mistaking
,
printing
(
sixtly
)
twice
,
that
the
latter
sixtly
should
be
seauenthly
,
and
this
eightly
or
the
eight
in
number
.
Againe
M.
Doctor
,
your
citation
consisteth
only
of
9.
lines
,
and
yet
a
part
of
them
is
your
owne
,
&
not
my
wordes
:
is
it
then
likely
,
that
either
eight
or
fiue
arguments
(
to
vse
your
phrase
)
are
truly
&
substantially
alleaged
in
so
short
a
breuiate
?
And
further
sincere
Sir
,
where
I
recompted
them
in
order
,
first
,
second
,
third
,
and
you
to
abuse
your
reader
,
and
shift
them
ouer
,
doe
recite
Reply
supr
.
pag
.
2.
3.
them
with
this
disorder
,
naming
that
first
,
which
is
the
fourth
,
then
you
returne
to
the
first
,
next
you
jumpe
to
the
second
and
third
,
after
you
rebound
againe
to
the
first
,
and
from
thence
you
leape
and
skippe
to
the
fift
.
And
in
these
citations
you
further
behaue
your selfe
with
this
sincerity
,
M.
Doctor
:
first
,
you
cite
my
answere
to
be
in
these
wordes
:
No
man
doubting
in
faith
,
but
only
such
as
be
obstinate
:
no
ignorant
beleeuer
,
or
deceaued
of
Heretikes
,
but
he
to
hom
the
truth
hath
beene
made
knowne
:
none
only
internally
infected
,
but
he
that
is
a
manifest
Professor
,
is
subiect
to
the
censure
of
excommunication
for
heresie
.
Now
Sir
,
I
must
tel
you
that
there
is
not
any
one
such
proposition
,
in
the
places
you
cite
from
my
answere
,
as
is
manifest
in
my
answere
;
for
proofe
whereof
I
Reply
cap
.
1.
2.
Answere
cap
.
2.
§.
fourthly
,
ibid
§.
for
f●rst
,
&
§.
secondly
,
§.
thirdly
,
●
.
for
first
,
fiftly
.
haue
set
downe
the
sections
which
you
cite
in
this
marg●ne
,
that
al
men
may
see
your
corruptions
,
too
tedious
to
be
particularly
here
discussed
.
And
I
am
so
farre
from
writing
as
you
haue
auouched
in
the
places
cited
by
you
,
that
in
my
whole
answere
they
are
not
to
be
found
,
only
in
the
f●ft
place
I
write
in
these
wordes
:
Fiftly
,
al
Heretikes
(
as
internal
)
be
not
subiect
to
censure
Answere
cap
.
2.
§.
Fi●tly
.
and
excommunication
.
And
yet
I
hope
there
is
great
difference
betweene
this
,
and
to
say
as
you
cite
,
That
none
but
he
that
is
a
manifest
Professor
is
subiect
to
the
censure
of
excommunication
,
for
heresie
.
For
by
internal
Heretikes
we
vnderstand
them
,
which
approue
heresie
only
in
their
minde
,
and
neuer
signifie
it
with
external
signe
,
word
,
writing
,
and
to
bring
it
to
the
notice
and
jurisdiction
of
the
external
court
:
which
cannot
proceede
but
by
external
allegations
and
probations
,
which
of
a
thing
meerely
internal
(
such
as
that
I
suppose
in
this
cogitation
)
cannot
be
had
in
such
a
case
.
Yet
many
may
,
and
doe
,
outwardly
speake
or
hold
heresie
,
which
be
not
manifest
Professors
,
Doctors
,
or
Teachers
of
it
,
as
D.
Morton
and
such
others
,
by
preaching
,
writing
,
printing
,
teaching
,
defending
,
and
are
made
manifest
.
Neither
is
this
sincere
disputer
and
learned
Doctor
,
fully
satisfied
with
these
so
odious
corruptions
,
in
this
one
citation
,
but
adding
new
and
more
glosses
of
his
owne
inuention
,
for
my
writing
telleth
his
reader
,
I
conclude
,
That
Protestants
in
our
Reply
supr
.
pag
.
3.
opinion
be
not
Heretikes
.
When
I
neuer
meant
any
such
absolute
proposition
,
neither
was
that
in
question
,
but
who
be
,
or
whether
English
Protestants
are
denounced
Heretikes
,
and
(
to
vse
the
wordes
of
D.
Morton
,
being
the
foundation
of
his
Romish
positions
)
so
odious
as
vnworthy
of
any
ciuil
,
or
natural
Romish
posit
.
pag
.
1.
§.
they
who
.
society
,
or
to
be
denied
al
ciuil
or
natural
respects
.
Which
in
his
first
Syllogisme
he
hath
re●orded
,
accordingly
as
is
here
cited
,
and
in
my
answere
I
disputed
against
him
.
But
M.
Doctor
now
clearely
perceaueth
,
that
this
the
ground
of
his
cauils
and
clamours
(
to
speake
in
his
owne
phrase
)
Reply
pag
.
24.
is
ouerthrowne
,
and
that
the
Priests
and
Catholikes
of
England
doe
not
esteeme
their
Country
Protestants
,
to
be
in
that
odious
and
vnworthy
state
,
to
which
this
worthy
writer
hath
assigned
them
,
but
doe
and
wil
yeeld
vnto
them
al
ciuil
,
and
natural
society
,
and
respects
,
in
as
ample
manner
,
as
if
they
were
of
the
same
religion
with
vs
:
Therefore
he
hath
diuised
a
new
tricke
,
further
to
shame
himselfe
for
euer
,
and
to
discredit
his
whole
writing
,
to
proceede
from
a
very
ignorant
or
wilful
Doctor
.
His
diuise
and
wordes
be
these
:
Seing
the
nature
of
heresie
is
such
,
Reply
pag
.
3.
§.
we
may
not
.
that
it
is
a
vice
proper
to
the
minde
:
it
may
denominate
the
subiect
whatsoeuer
an
Heretike
without
obstinacy
,
which
is
only
a
peruerse
obliquity
of
the
wil
:
And
therefore
man
may
be
an
Heretike
,
though
he
be
not
obstinate
.
This
is
the
excellent
reasoning
of
this
Syllogist
:
in
the
former
proposition
he
would
haue
al
Heretikes
and
Protestants
especially
,
so
odious
and
vnworthy
of
D.
Morton
m●keth
not
only
al
Protestants
,
but
the
ancient
Fathers
,
and
Christs
Di●●iples
also
to
be
●●r●tikes
.
ciuil
society
,
as
is
declared
:
And
in
this
last
doct●ine
,
he
doth
not
only
make
al
Protestants
,
by
their
owne
proceedings
,
to
be
Heretikes
,
and
such
Heretikes
by
reason
of
their
manifould
errours
,
by
themselues
acknowledged
,
but
would
accuse
al
the
auncient
Fathers
(
whom
the
Protestants
charge
with
errours
)
and
the
Disciples
themselues
of
Christ
,
(
as
D.
Doue
pe●●w●sion
pag
.
13.
D.
Doue
h●th
noted
)
of
heresie
:
So
that
by
this
argument
,
if
al
those
holy
Fathers
and
Disciples
of
Christ
were
now
liuing
,
D.
M●rt●n
could
not
by
his
doctrine
,
giue
any
ciuil
or
natural
respect
vnto
them
,
not
so
much
as
to
salute
them
.
And
(
except
heauen
is
prouided
for
Heretikes
)
they
are
al
damned
in
hel
for
euer
by
his
sentence
.
But
this
absurdity
of
D.
Morton
hath
beene
more
then
sufficiently
confuted
by
his
other
aduersary
,
in
the
Mitigation
:
wherefore
I
wil
briefly
confute
him
in
this
point
,
only
with
his
present
Protestant
brethren
in
England
.
And
first
D.
Couel
writeth
thus
:
Heretikes
are
neither
simple
Infidels
nor
Idolaters
,
Couel
Examinat
.
pag
.
202.
but
obstinately
erring
in
some
fundamental
point
.
B.
Doue
hath
these
wordes
:
I
define
an
heresie
in
this
manner
:
it
is
an
errour
Doue
perswas
.
supr
.
pag
.
13.
st●fly
and
obstinately
defended
and
maintained
,
and
for
example
,
the
Disciples
(
Act.
15.
)
erred
when
they
held
it
necessary
to
be
circumcised
,
yet
were
not
Heretikes
,
because
they
were
not
obstinate
,
for
they
submitted
themselues
to
the
iudgement
of
the
Church
,
and
after
due
consultation
was
had
,
they
consented
to
the
truth
.
Hitherto
B.
Doue
;
where
D.
Morton
may
learne
,
that
obstinacy
is
required
to
heresie
,
and
that
himselfe
not
submitting
to
the
judgement
of
the
Church
,
but
remaining
in
obstinate
writing
against
it
,
is
an
Heretike
,
§
.
M.
Ormerods
sentence
is
Ormerod
pict
.
pur
.
Dialog
.
2.
&
Pict
.
pap
.
pag
.
114.
this
:
He
is
an
Heretike
which
so
swarueth
from
the
holsome
doctrine
,
as
contemning
the
iudgement
both
of
God
,
and
the
Church
,
persisteth
in
his
opinion
,
and
breaketh
the
vnity
of
the
Church
.
And
againe
in
these
wordes
:
It
is
not
denied
by
any
sort
of
Diuines
,
Dialog
.
2.
supr
.
auncient
or
recent
,
but
that
he
is
an
Heretike
,
which
doth
stifly
and
obstinately
defend
any
errour
,
that
doth
either
directly
impugne
some
article
of
the
faith
,
or
the
true
sence
and
meaning
of
the
same
article
of
faith
.
And
citing
Beza
and
Danaeus
for
the
same
doctrine
,
he
addeth
thus
:
And
of
the
same
iudgement
are
al
other
writers
of
note
.
Then
D.
Morton
by
this
Protestant
judgement
,
is
no
writer
of
note
,
for
al
such
condemne
him
,
whether
they
be
Catholikes
or
Protestants
,
auncient
or
recent
.
And
the
note
which
is
left
for
him
,
is
to
be
notable
,
or
notorious
,
for
singularities
,
forgeries
,
slaunders
,
corruptions
,
errours
,
and
vices
of
like
note
.
∵
THE
ELEAVENTH
CHAPTER
Of
D.
MORTONS
corruptions
and
false
citations
further
in
particular
.
DOctor
Morton
hauing
thus
sincerely
and
learnedly
behaued
himselfe
,
in
his
second
and
third
chapter
,
in
reciting
my
answere
,
and
expressing
his
owne
opinion
about
heresie
,
as
is
declared
;
In
his
fourth
chapter
maketh
his
fourth
citation
of
my
answere
,
that
before
excommunication
,
communion
is
not
forbidden
,
Reply
cap
.
4.
pag
.
5.
where
among
other
authorities
reciting
the
Laterane
Councel
,
to
delude
his
readers
,
he
quite
leaueth
out
these
words
:
By
whose
decree
the
party
must
be
both
so
censured
,
and
requisitus
Moderat
.
answ
.
cap
.
2.
3.
sixtly
.
&
monitus
ab
Ecclesia
,
required
and
monished
of
the
Church
;
In
which
the
force
of
the
argument
,
and
authority
consisted
,
for
the
matter
questioned
.
And
yet
,
the
more
to
colour
his
owne
behaviour
,
he
challengeth
me
of
three
vntruthes
,
which
he
vttereth
in
these
wordes
:
1.
No
communion
forbidde
to
any
before
excommunication
.
Reply
pag
.
5.
§.
I
haue
justly
.
2.
No
Heretike
excommunicate
by
name
,
is
subiect
to
any
penalty
.
3.
No
Protestant
is
excommunicate
by
name
.
Hitherto
M.
Doctors
accusation
of
three
palpable
vntruthes
committed
by
me
.
But
I
wil
discharge
my selfe
,
and
lay
both
the
vntruthes
,
and
palpability
vpon
him
.
And
concerning
the
first
:
(
No
communion
forbidde
to
any
before
excommunication
.
)
If
he
meaneth
,
I
speake
it
absolutely
of
men
not
excommunicate
by
any
excommunication
:
how
is
it
vntruth
?
can
a
man
not
excommunicate
,
be
excommunicate
?
or
a
man
in
communion
,
be
not
,
in
,
but
out
of
communion
?
if
these
contradictories
cannot
be
true
,
this
cannot
be
an
vntruth
palpable
,
or
vnpalpable
;
for
a
man
in
communion
,
is
not
excommunicate
,
which
is
to
be
out
of
communion
.
If
he
expoundeth
it
of
men
excommunicate
by
name
(
which
his
wordes
expresse
not
:
)
Then
Antonin
.
part
.
3.
Tit
.
25.
c
.
3
Tolet
.
Instruct
.
l.
1.
c
.
9.
Fum
.
sum
.
v.
excom
.
num
.
●●
.
Sil●
.
v.
excom
.
num
.
5.
§.
7.
Sci●nd
.
c●●
4.
M●ior
.
4.
dist
.
18.
q
.
3.
Sot
.
4.
dist
.
22.
Ledesm
.
4.
q
.
23.
art
.
1.
Victor
.
sum
.
de
Sacram
.
tract
.
de
excom
.
Angel
.
excom
.
8.
num
.
3.
Tabien
.
Interdict
.
3.
q
.
9.
Azor
l.
8.
instit
.
cap
.
11.
Rosell
.
v.
excom
.
6.
num
.
44.
&c.
Ioh
.
Molan
.
tract
.
1.
cap
.
16.
concl
.
2.
Coua●
.
c
.
Alma
.
mater
▪
Nauar
.
de
orat
.
cap
.
9.
&
manual
.
c
.
27.
Sa
.
v.
v.
excom
.
Concil
.
Const
.
apud
S.
Anton
.
part
.
3.
titul
.
25.
cap
.
3.
&
Caiet
.
sum
.
v.
excom
.
Moderat
.
answ
.
c
.
2.
§.
seau●nthly
.
&
●
.
supr
.
S.
Antoninus
,
Tollet
,
Fumus
,
Siluester
,
Maior
,
Sotus
,
Ledesm
.
Victor
.
Angel
.
Tabien
.
Azor
,
Molanus
,
Rosell
.
Couaruvias
,
Nauarre
,
with
others
,
and
the
general
Councel
of
Constance
it selfe
,
doe
tel
him
,
that
in
our
question
of
ciuil
communications
,
there
is
truth
,
and
no
vntruth
in
that
proposition
:
And
this
hath
beene
so
palpably
already
proued
against
him
,
that
he
giueth
no
contradiction
to
it
:
but
thus
shifteth
vp
and
downe
.
The
second
citation
is
D.
Mortons
corruption
,
and
not
my
assertion
:
for
my
proposition
is
only
this
:
No
Protestant
,
or
Heretike
not
excommunicate
by
name
,
lieth
subiect
to
any
penalty
pretended
.
When
(
as
before
)
my
sincerely
dealing
aduersary
citeth
me
to
say
:
That
such
are
not
subiect
to
any
penalty
at
al.
Which
is
his
corruption
and
not
my
proposition
,
as
is
manifest
.
The
last
also
is
his
forgery
,
and
not
my
opinion
,
which
is
this
:
No
Protestant
in
England
is
excommunicate
by
name
:
which
limitation
(
in
England
)
for
which
our
controuersie
was
,
he
leaueth
out
,
and
maketh
it
an
vnlimited
proposition
,
containing
al
Protestants
,
of
al
times
and
places
,
wholy
changing
the
state
of
the
question
.
He
raiseth
further
a
new
slaunder
against
me
,
as
though
Reply
pag
.
5.
6.
when
he
cited
diuers
authorities
besides
Panormitane
,
I
should
only
answere
the
authority
of
Panormitane
;
when
these
authorities
be
alleaged
by
D.
Morton
,
only
in
his
fourth
reason
,
and
Romish
posit
.
ration
.
4.
pag
.
15.
16.
not
in
this
place
.
And
in
my
answere
to
that
reason
,
I
answered
them
al
by
name
particularly
,
which
be
these
,
there
recounted
,
Tollet
,
Massouius
,
Panormitane
,
Gregorius
de
Valentia
,
Answere
cap
.
5.
§.
let
vs
heare
.
Bannes
,
and
Philopater
.
And
there
I
shewed
how
he
misalleaged
their
authorities
,
and
they
rather
made
against
himselfe
.
And
these
be
the
wronges
which
he
complained
before
I
had
done
:
whereof
(
as
I
promised
in
my
fift
chapter
)
I
haue
freed
Cap.
5.
supr
.
my selfe
,
and
put
them
among
his
falshoods
.
THE
TWELFTH
CHAPTER
.
Of
D.
MORTONS
corruptions
and
falsyfications
further
in
particular
.
THe
next
citation
from
my
answere
,
he
citeth
in
his
fift
chapter
,
and
is
set
downe
in
these
words
:
(
None
is
excommunicate
,
Reply
c
.
5.
p.
8.
§.
this
your
.
who
is
not
excommunicate
by
name
:
)
and
he
calleth
this
my
proposition
,
when
himselfe
in
the
very
lines
before
citeth
my
opinion
in
this
manner
:
No
Protestant
in
England
is
in
Reply
pag
.
8.
supr
.
§.
No
Protestant
.
our
opinion
excommunicate
by
name
:
and
therefore
lieth
not
subiect
to
the
penalty
pretended
,
ergo
,
the
foundation
of
this
discouery
is
ruinate
.
Now
M.
Doctor
(
your
selfe
being
judge
)
that
is
not
my
proposition
,
but
your
corruption
:
And
this
you
further
confirme
,
in
your
next
citation
in
the
same
chapter
,
thus
alleaging
my
opinion
:
We
doe
not
esteeme
al
Protestants
for
Heretikes
Reply
pag
.
12.
§.
thus
haue
.
and
excommunicate
,
as
he
pretendeth
:
neither
that
they
are
subiect
to
such
penalties
,
as
he
alleageth
.
This
M.
Doctor
doth
not
agree
with
that
,
which
you
cited
before
,
therefore
you
are
at
shameful
disagreement
and
variance
with
your selfe
.
And
yet
in
this
very
last
citation
,
you
are
not
forgetful
of
your
vsual
art
,
and
custome
of
false
dealing
:
for
you
passe
ouer
the
most
material
wordes
,
which
immediately
follow
and
be
these
:
Neither
Moderat
.
answ
.
c
.
2.
§.
thus
haue
that
they
are
subiect
to
such
penalties
as
he
alleageth
,
that
they
are
not
censured
,
or
as
such
to
be
depriued
of
any
ciuil
society
,
English
Catholikes
loue
to
English
Protestants
.
communication
,
their
goods
,
liues
,
liberties
,
dignities
,
honour
,
homage
,
fealty
,
subiection
,
duty
,
loue
,
or
any
thing
pretious
,
their
proper
and
peculiar
:
but
contrariwise
to
enioy
and
possesse
their
priuileges
,
in
as
ample
manner
and
freedome
,
as
if
they
were
of
the
same
religion
which
we
defend
.
Hitherto
the
wordes
of
my
conclusion
,
which
he
wholy
omitted
,
●o
reserue
some
colour
of
countenance
his
slaunders
against
vs
:
for
what
semblance
,
or
least
shew
of
reason
can
he
deuise
,
to
persecute
and
prosecute
those
Catholike
Priests
for
temporal
enimies
,
which
teach
,
hold
,
write
,
and
wil
sweare
to
performe
al
such
ciuilities
,
duties
,
and
loue
,
and
liue
in
as
great
amity
with
Protestants
(
though
obstinate
in
their
opinion
)
as
if
they
were
of
the
same
religion
with
vs
?
To
al
this
,
to
his
confusion
,
and
whole
ruine
of
his
cause
,
he
maketh
no
answere
,
but
with
lying
euasion
graunteth
victory
:
In
your
minde
you
gaine-say
that
,
which
with
your
pen
Reply
pag
.
13.
§.
thus
haue
you
.
you
publish
.
Why
M.
Doctor
,
is
the
issue
come
to
this
,
with
al
your
expresse
dogmatical
principles
,
that
except
my
pen
and
minde
disagree
,
your
cause
quite
is
ouerthrowne
as
I
argue
in
that
place
?
Then
Sir
,
to
perswade
you
(
as
before
,
and
if
not
you
,
yet
al
that
be
not
infected
with
such
your
obstinacy
and
malice
)
that
my
minde
and
pen
and
the
mindes
of
other
Priests
and
Catholikes
herein
agree
;
Tel
me
I
pray
you
,
is
it
not
a
question
of
doctrine
and
religion
,
which
was
betweene
D.
Morton
and
the
Moderate
answere●
?
yes
Sir
,
you
affirme
it
to
be
Romish
doctrine
:
Romish
posit
.
in
titul
.
Then
I
demaunde
againe
where
you
finde
it
in
our
doctrine
,
that
any
Priest
or
Catholike
writer
,
or
not
writer
may
dissemble
his
religion
,
or
equiuocate
in
the
least
question
belonging
to
faith
,
and
the
honour
of
God
?
for
this
cause
M.
Doctor
,
so
many
Priests
and
Catholikes
in
England
endure
persecution
,
because
they
wil
not
,
and
may
not
dissemble
,
or
deny
their
inward
minde
and
opinion
,
by
pen
,
word
,
or
any
external
signe
.
For
this
cause
so
many
renowmed
of
that
holy
function
and
religion
,
haue
rather
chosen
to
suffer
most
cruel
death
,
in
a
late
Protestant
regiment
in
this
Kingdome
,
&
for
this
quarrel
,
then
to
equiuocate
or
halt
in
professing
any
point
of
faith
,
though
with
such
meanes
al
penalties
might
haue
beene
auoided
.
There
fore
as
it
cannot
be
doubted
,
but
my
minde
and
pen
agree
,
so
it
is
euident
your
cause
is
desolute
and
ouerthrowne
,
and
you
ought
to
cease
persecution
and
clamour
against
vs.
And
yet
further
for
the
wrapping
vp
of
this
matter
,
take
a
lie
,
or
two
more
of
your
making
,
with
you
in
this
place
:
within
the
space
of
two
lines
you
ingeminate
and
twice
cite
for
my
words
this
proposition
:
Protestants
are
no
Heretikes
:
Protestants
are
Reply
pag
.
13.
no
Heretikes
.
When
I
neuer
spake
,
writ
,
or
thought
any
such
absolute
assertion
,
therefore
it
is
to
be
added
to
the
number
of
your
inuentions
.
And
concluding
this
chapter
with
these
words
from
my
answere
:
Thus
is
his
chiefest
building
of
slaunders
against
vs
ruinate
.
In
which
you
first
leaue
out
,
(
al
these
)
which
destroieth
your
whole
booke
of
Principles
.
Secondly
,
you
haue
passed
ouer
al
those
essential
thinges
,
which
I
cited
before
,
and
were
assigned
the
cause
why
the
chiefest
buildings
of
althes●
your
slaunders
was
ruinate
.
Thirdly
,
you
answere
nothing
to
that
which
you
cite
,
but
only
that
which
condemneth
you
by
your
owne
silence
,
and
law
of
exception
before
:
your
only
reply
is
this
:
O
good
Sir
,
you
might
haue
learned
this
good
by
others
Reply
pag
.
13.
●●pr
.
late
euils
,
to
take
heede
you
entermeddle
not
in
ruinating
of
buildings
.
Therefore
(
O
good
Sir
)
I
may
safely
conclude
you
haue
nothing
to
say
,
to
saue
your
expresse
dogmatical
principles
from
a
forged
slaunder
,
so
expressed
or
impressed
by
your
owne
writing
.
And
as
my
art
in
ruinating
,
consisteth
in
ruinating
and
destroying
such
rotten
arguments
and
corruptions
,
as
you
haue
vsed
:
So
other
kinde
of
ruinating
here
insinuated
(
out
of
the
matter
)
by
you
,
I
leaue
to
the
Authour
of
Iustification
of
Protestants
,
&c.
as
before
I
proued
.
THE
THIRTEENTH
CHAPTER
.
How
D.
MORTON
hath
condemned
himselfe
,
and
of
his
corruptions
further
in
particular
.
AFter
this
D.
Morton
recoileth
backe
,
no
further
then
to
the
very
place
where
he
beganne
,
as
appeareth
both
by
the
citation
,
and
his
marginal
quotation
of
my
answere
(
initio
,
in
the
beginning
.
)
A
large
jump
backward
,
9.
pages
long
:
though
not
so
Doctorlike
,
after
he
had
handled
the
conclusion
,
as
is
before
declared
:
Yet
before
he
citeth
my
answere
,
he
giueth
this
Title
to
this
his
sixt
chapter
.
Hitherto
haue
we
only
confirmed
Reply
pag
.
14.
cap
.
6.
our
Autecedent
,
namely
that
Protestants
in
the
common
censure
of
Papists
,
are
esteemed
Heretikes
,
&c.
Now
M.
Doctor
,
let
vs
haue
a
little
sincere
dealing
,
though
you
must
be
haled
,
pulled
,
and
drawne
vnto
it
:
you
tel
vs
,
you
haue
confirmed
your
Antecedent
,
and
that
this
Antecedent
was
this
,
Namely
that
Protestants
in
the
common
censure
of
Papists
are
esteemed
Heretikes
:
But
I
pray
you
,
be
remembred
first
,
that
this
was
not
your
Antecedent
:
Because
your
memory
is
badde
,
when
you
are
at
a
non
plus
,
and
know
not
what
to
say
,
I
wil
make
repetition
of
your
(
so
called
)
Antecedent
.
Your
wordes
be
these
in
the
beginning
of
your
reasons
.
The
first
reason
:
Their
Romi●h
posit
.
pag
.
1.
general
assumption
,
wherupon
al
their
rebellious
positions
are
founded
,
is
this
,
that
al
Protestants
are
Heretikes
,
and
excommunicate
.
This
M.
Doctor
I
thinke
you
make
as
a
supposition
,
and
not
Antecedent
in
any
argument
,
for
it
is
thus
alone
set
by
it selfe
.
And
yet
,
if
it
were
your
Antecedent
,
you
must
needes
graunt
me
,
that
your
last
citation
is
false
:
first
,
because
in
your
positions
you
cal
it
their
general
assumption
,
which
word
(
general
)
you
know
comprehendeth
al
,
and
excludeth
none
:
and
yet
in
this
place
you
only
name
it
the
common
censure
(
or
opinion
)
of
Papists
.
Which
is
not
the
same
,
with
your
former
,
because
besides
the
common
censure
and
opinion
,
there
be
often
many
or
diuers
o●hers
,
and
not
condemned
.
Secondly
M.
Doctor
,
in
your
first
assertion
,
you
make
it
only
the
assumption
of
Priests
,
to
make
them
only
worthy
of
death
,
here
you
cal
it
the
common
censure
of
Papists
,
making
Papists
,
not
Priests
,
as
deepe
in
these
positions
as
Priests
,
and
so
worthy
of
equal
punishment
.
Then
Sir
I
pray
you
,
how
doth
this
agree
with
your
late
Preamble
,
where
you
Morton
Preamble
pag
.
36.
haue
these
wordes
?
I
write
against
our
aduersaries
(
Papists
or
Priests
)
but
not
without
note
of
difference
and
distinction
,
being
D.
Morton
condemneth
●is
owne
positions
,
and
false
accusation
of
Catholikes
.
verily
perswaded
that
diuers
euen
of
the
zealous
amongst
them
,
doe
abhorre
such
doctrines
and
practizes
,
as
haue
beene
discouered
in
the
cases
of
rebellion
and
equinocation
.
Now
Sir
,
here
you
excuse
diuers
euen
of
the
zealous
of
our
religion
,
then
generally
your
doctrine
is
not
true
,
and
your
latter
interpretation
of
Papists
common
censure
,
is
like
to
be
as
false
.
And
to
make
euident
demonstration
againe
,
that
you
haue
ouerthrowne
your
expresse
dogmatical
principles
,
in
the
cited
place
of
your
Preamble
,
you
note
in
the
margine
in
these
wordes
:
A
difference
of
Romish
Professors
,
concerning
the
case
Preamble
pag
.
36.
in
marg
.
of
rebellion
.
Therefore
seing
you
are
a
Doctor
,
and
wil
speake
like
a
Scholler
,
only
calling
them
Professors
,
or
Romish
Professors
,
which
be
Doctors
,
Priests
,
and
Diuines
,
as
the
manner
of
speaking
is
,
you
doe
exclude
diuers
Romish
Professors
,
from
holding
those
opinions
which
you
cal
expresse
dogmatical
principles
,
which
be
such
(
as
before
)
that
no
Professor
may
deny
them
.
Therefore
your
expresse
dogmatical
principles
by
your
owne
sentence
are
expresly
ouerthrowne
.
And
M.
Doctor
,
further
if
that
assumption
were
your
Antecedent
▪
you
haue
committed
two
other
errours
in
your
citation
;
first
you
leaue
out
the
word
(
al
)
which
altereth
the
proposition
:
secondly
,
you
haue
clipped
away
these
wordes
(
and
excommunicate
:
)
in
which
by
your
owne
interpretation
,
the
force
of
al
consisted
.
For
if
men
be
Heretikes
,
and
yet
not
excommunicate
,
or
not
so
excommunicate
,
that
they
are
to
be
depriued
of
ciuil
societies
,
and
al
your
arguments
be
fallacies
,
and
conclude
nothing
.
And
this
I
demonstrate
,
by
your
owne
Antecedent
,
expounded
by
your selfe
,
which
is
in
this
manner
:
After
you
had
in
your
positions
set
downe
the
assumption
,
of
which
I
haue
entreated
:
in
your
first
Syllogisme
you
expound
it
for
your
Antecedent
thus
,
and
in
these
wordes
:
They
who
by
their
slaunderous
Romish
posit
,
pag
.
1.
supr
.
doctrine
make
al
Protestants
(
in
their
common
censure
Heretikes
)
so
odious
and
vnworthy
of
any
ciuil
or
natural
society
,
must
necessarily
be
adiudged
seditious
and
intollerable
amongst
the
Protestants
:
This
is
your
owne
Antecedent
M.
Doctor
,
or
your
interpretation
thereof
,
word
for
word
:
recited
in
the
same
place
,
where
you
named
that
general
assumption
.
And
immediately
following
the
same
,
only
with
these
conuecting
wordes
betweene
them
:
Now
then
we
may
argue
,
first
:
after
which
followeth
Pag
.
1.
sup
.
your
recited
interpretation
of
your
Antecedent
,
which
you
make
the
first
proposition
of
your
first
Syllogisme
;
And
then
recite
the
second
proposition
thus
:
But
the
Romish
Seminaries
Supr
.
pag
.
1.
and
Iesuites
,
doe
brand
al
Protestants
with
detestable
crimes
:
thereby
to
deny
them
al
ciuil
or
natural
respects
:
And
immediately
from
hence
you
inferre
your
Ergo
,
or
Conclusion
.
Now
M.
Doctor
,
let
the
world
judge
,
whether
your
Antecedent
was
,
as
in
this
place
you
cite
it
:
(
That
Protestants
in
the
Reply
pag
.
14.
common
censure
of
Papists
are
esteemed
Heretikes
)
and
in
no
other
manner
.
After
this
let
vs
come
to
his
citation
of
my
answere
in
this
place
:
thus
he
alleageth
it
:
His
assumption
being
ruinate
,
that
Reply
pag
.
14.
supr
.
Protestants
are
not
esteemed
of
vs
Heretikes
,
or
excommunicate
:
it
followeth
,
that
no
p●sitions
which
we
maintaine
are
rebelli●us
:
because
he
telleth
vs
,
that
al
such
are
built
vpon
this
assumption
.
Hitherto
his
citation
from
my
answere
:
in
which
question
I
first
desire
al
readers
,
to
keepe
in
memory
what
interpretation
D.
Morton
hath
made
of
that
Assumption
before
,
and
in
what
sence
I
did
and
was
enforced
by
his
owne
exposition
to
answere
,
as
is
before
declared
.
Then
I
must
further
tel
him
,
that
besides
that
his
corrupt
dealing
,
he
hath
againe
corrupted
the
wordes
of
my
answere
:
for
my
position
is
,
as
followeth
:
This
position
(
al
Protestants
Moderat
.
answ
.
cap
.
2.
●
.
wherefore
.
are
Heretikes
and
excommunicate
)
is
no
general
assumption
in
Catholike
Religion
.
For
al
men
in
errour
are
not
Heretikes
,
except
they
be
obstinate
as
D.
Morton
is
,
as
I
haue
proued
euen
by
his
owne
fellowes
in
religion
,
the
present
Protestant
writers
of
England
.
Secondly
,
M.
Doctor
leaueth
out
the
word
(
al
)
which
changeth
the
nature
of
the
proposition
.
Thirdly
,
(
as
he
hath
done
in
a
former
citation
)
he
turneth
the
copulatiue
proposition
into
a
disiunctiue
,
altogether
altering
the
sence
and
truth
,
of
that
which
is
questioned
.
Next
let
vs
heare
what
he
answereth
to
that
last
citation
,
ouerthrowing
al
his
arguments
at
once
:
his
wordes
be
these
:
Which
(
it
followeth
)
wanteth
feete
to
follow
,
because
there
be
two
Reply
pag
.
14.
supr
.
other
reasons
to
proue
your
doctrine
rebellious
.
The
first
from
the
effects
we
see
:
the
second
from
an
other
principle
of
doctrine
,
which
you
generally
maintaine
.
Which
he
after
expoundeth
to
be
the
Popes
excommunications
.
Concerning
these
his
two
reasons
,
I
Christian
and
modest
offer
,
An.
1606.
p.
19.
Offer
of
confer
.
haue
reasoned
so
much
with
him
already
,
that
his
owne
friends
haue
told
him
he
doth
pittifully
shift
off
the
matter
in
a
late
reply
vnto
the
Papists
.
And
so
many
other
Protestants
in
England
at
this
present
,
and
of
chiefe
account
,
haue
before
condemned
him
.
And
himselfe
being
often
charged
,
how
I
haue
confuted
him
,
in
his
late
Preamble
is
so
silent
to
deny
it
,
that
by
his
owne
law
and
rules
of
arguing
,
he
hath
graunted
victory
.
And
to
this
passe
he
is
also
brought
in
this
place
,
for
he
doth
not
deny
but
my
consequent
(
that
Priests
and
Catholikes
be
innocent
,
and
his
positions
be
slanders
)
doth
follow
vpon
the
ouerthrow
of
his
Antecedent
or
Assumption
;
but
he
would
finde
an
euasion
by
those
other
two
reasons
,
already
also
confuted
.
Which
how
vnseeming
a
thing
it
is
for
a
Doctor
to
write
,
I
leaue
to
al
young
Schollers
to
teach
him
,
that
no
new
supply
(
yet
those
here
be
confuted
)
can
make
a
former
erroneous
argument
,
or
fallacy
to
be
of
force
.
Therfore
there
be
feete
,
and
legges
also
,
to
make
this
consequent
to
follow
;
Where
the
foundation
is
ouerthrowne
;
that
which
was
builded
vpon
it
,
cannot
stand
.
And
if
M.
Doctor
is
so
much
decaied
in
his
owne
sences
,
that
he
cannot
perceaue
this
,
except
he
be
also
admonished
of
his
brethren
Protestants
;
the
wordes
of
the
Protestant
Apologie
of
the
oath
of
alleageance
(
so
priuileged
as
before
)
be
these
:
The
ground
failing
,
the
building
Apolog
.
pag
.
82.
cannot
stand
.
Therefore
,
except
Catholikes
and
Protestants
be
deceaued
by
their
sences
,
except
a
building
can
be
without
foundation
;
an
effect
without
a
cause
;
a
consequent
,
when
the
antecedent
is
not
;
a
Syllogisme
without
a
medium
:
two
things
connected
or
seperated
in
a
third
,
where
there
neither
is
any
such
connection
or
seperation
,
or
any
third
at
al
,
to
joyne
or
diuide
them
,
(
al
which
be
things
vnpossible
)
al
D.
Mortons
expresse
dogmatical
principles
are
vtterly
ouerthrowne
,
and
turned
into
expresse
principal
lies
,
falsyfications
,
and
forgeries
.
THE
FOVRTEENTH
CHAPTER
.
Of
the
like
corruption
of
D.
MORTON
,
and
how
no
credit
i●
to
be
giuen
to
his
and
other
Protestants
writings
.
THe
next
place
of
my
answere
which
D.
Morton
citeth
in
his
reply
,
is
foure
leaues
from
the
former
,
and
alleaged
by
Moderat
.
answ
.
cap
.
2.
§.
now
I
wil
.
Reply
cap
.
7.
pag
.
16.
him
in
these
words
:
My
answere
is
absolute
before
,
that
no
learned
Catholike
reputeth
the
Protestants
,
or
any
one
Protestant
of
this
Kingdome
an
Heretike
.
Hitherto
the
wordes
of
his
citation
:
And
to
shew
a
little
further
,
the
integrity
of
this
holy
Protestant
Doctor
,
both
in
this
and
other
thinges
of
like
nature
before
,
because
the
section
of
my
answere
from
whence
he
would
cite
these
wordes
,
is
but
briefe
,
and
yet
containeth
the
question
betweene
him
and
me
,
which
he
hath
so
often
dissembled
,
and
corrupted
my
writing
to
conceale
it
,
I
wil
craue
pardon
to
cite
it
word
for
word
in
this
place
,
and
it
is
as
followeth
.
Now
I
wil
with
breuity
answere
to
his
particular
pretended
reasons
,
Moderat
.
answ
.
cap
.
2.
§.
now
I
wil
.
grounded
vpon
the
general
before
confuted
:
And
first
to
his
Syllogisme
,
or
rather
Sophisme
:
the
maior
proposition
whereof
is
already
ouerthrowne
,
and
only
requiring
repetition
,
is
as
followeth
:
They
who
by
their
slanderous
doctrine
make
al
Protestants
(
in
their
common
censure
Heretikes
)
so
odious
and
vnworthy
of
any
ciuil
or
natural
society
,
must
necessarily
be
adiudged
seditions
,
and
intollerable
among
the
Protestants
:
My
answere
is
absolute
before
,
that
no
learned
Catholike
so
reputeth
the
Protestants
,
or
any
one
Protestant
of
this
Kingdome
:
but
attributeth
(
or
ought
so
to
doe
by
his
Catholik●
duty
to
Prince
,
and
affection
to
al
English
Protestants
.
religion
)
as
much
terrene
honour
,
homage
,
duty
,
and
loue
,
to
our
King
,
his
Honourable
Counsaile
,
and
al
in
authority
,
in
their
degrees
,
and
vnfained
affection
to
the
rest
,
as
if
they
were
of
the
same
faith
and
profession
in
religion
.
Hitherto
the
whole
section
in
my
answere
from
whence
D.
Morton
alleageth
that
,
which
he
cited
before
in
these
wordes
:
My
answere
is
absolute
Reply
supr
.
pag
.
16.
before
,
that
no
learned
Catholike
reputeth
the
Protestants
,
or
any
one
Protestant
of
this
Kingdome
an
Heretike
.
When
we
see
,
there
is
not
any
such
sentence
in
my
answere
;
but
our
question
was
this
,
whether
in
the
doctrine
of
Catholikes
al
Protestants
were
made
so
odious
and
vnworthy
of
any
ciuil
or
natural
society
:
which
he
in
his
positions
did
set
downe
for
his
ground
,
and
seing
it
so
euidently
confuted
,
is
forced
to
such
corruptions
,
to
conceale
and
dissemble
the
question
,
and
the
wordes
of
my
answere
to
his
confusion
.
But
yet
he
wil
not
amend
,
for
in
the
next
citation
from
my
Reply
pag
.
17.
answere
,
whereas
in
true
dealing
it
should
proue
(
as
my
answere
there
doth
)
that
the
Protestants
themselues
as
much
comdemne
Protestants
,
as
Catholikes
doe
,
and
so
make
(
by
D.
Mortons
argument
)
Protestants
intollerable
among
Protestants
,
and
in
the
same
condition
with
Priests
&
Iesuites
among
Protestants
in
his
opinion
:
This
Doctor
not
willing
to
vnder-goe
the
inconueniences
of
his
owne
disputing
,
and
positions
,
being
perfectly
instructed
and
practized
for
his
aduantage
,
in
the
Arts
of
contraction
,
dilatation
,
amplification
,
diminution
,
alteration
,
subtraction
,
corruption
,
falsyfication
,
and
other
vndoctor
like
behauiours
,
vseth
his
cunning
of
contraction
in
this
place
;
for
that
which
in
my
answere
consisted
of
aboue
20.
lines
,
he
in
his
citation
by
his
omnipotent
faculty
of
penetration
,
hath
couched
and
condensed
in
foure
lines
,
one
word
,
and
an
halfe
:
and
yet
vseth
no
abridgement
at
al
,
but
skippeth
it
ouer
,
and
moueth
from
bound
to
bound
without
passing
by
the
middle
.
And
that
The
Protestant
Deane
&
College
of
Tubinge
Reply
pag
.
17.
§.
that
which
.
which
he
citeth
being
of
a
learned
Protestant
Deane
and
College
among
them
,
he
answereth
in
these
wordes
:
Protestants
w●ting
in
opposition
,
not
much
to
be
regarded
,
by
D.
Mortons
judgement
.
That
which
they
did
in
the
spirit
of
opposition
and
contention
,
is
not
much
to
be
regarded
.
I
thanke
you
M.
Doctor
,
for
this
your
sincere
dealing
,
though
but
little
;
for
if
that
is
not
much
to
be
regarded
,
which
Protestants
and
of
such
credit
among
you
,
as
Philippus
Nicholaus
and
the
College
of
Tubinge
,
did
in
the
spirit
of
opposition
and
contention
;
it
is
not
much
,
but
very
little
,
or
nothing
to
be
regarded
,
what
your
Doctorship
endued
with
a
spirit
of
opposition
,
and
contention
to
Catholikes
,
P●otestants
,
and
your selfe
also
,
(
as
hath
beene
proued
)
haue
done
or
published
in
your
writings
.
THE
FIFTEENTH
CHAPTER
.
Of
diuers
other
corruptions
of
D.
MORTON
in
particular
:
And
how
by
his
owne
arguments
,
either
wilfully
or
grosly
ignorantly
,
he
proueth
himselfe
an
Idolater
,
Atheist
,
of
no
religion
,
and
in
manifest
state
of
damnation
.
NEither
is
D.
Mortons
contracting
and
penetrating
art
forgotten
in
his
next
citation
,
nor
his
corrupt
and
prophane
dealing
any
thing
at
al
amended
:
for
first
he
hath
drawne
my
section
of
23.
lines
,
into
three
lines
,
and
an
halfe
:
And
to
giue
some
experi●●nt
thereof
,
he
only
citeth
from
my
answere
,
concerning
M.
H.
Broughton
his
dislike
of
English
Protestant
proceedings
,
these
wordes
:
Who
telleth
the
Bishops
of
England
that
their
translation
of
the
Scripture
is
corrupt
,
and
that
Christianity
is
deuied
here
in
England
.
Hitherto
his
citation
,
in
which
there
is
no
mention
,
what
and
how
great
this
corruption
,
neither
who
they
be
,
which
thus
deny
Christianity
,
but
a
man
would
by
such
citation
rather
thinke
they
were
some
few
vpst●●t
Atheists
or
nullifidians
,
rather
then
chiefe
Protestant
Professors
:
But
to
make
the
matter
and
this
mans
sincerity
somewhat
more
manifest
,
I
wil
recite
some
of
the
assertions
of
this
great
Linguist
&
learned
Protestant
,
set
downe
in
my
answere
,
and
forgotten
by
D.
Morton
:
which
follow
in
this
manner
.
The
English
(
Protestant
)
translation
of
Scriptures
is
such
,
Moderat
.
answ
.
cap
.
2.
§.
I
wil
.
H.
Brough
.
aduertis
.
of
corrupt
.
An.
1604.
that
it
causeth
millions
of
millions
to
reiect
the
new
Testament
,
and
to
runne
to
eternal
flames
,
the
text
of
the
old
Testament
is
peruerted
in
eight
hundred
and
eight
and
fourty
places
.
The
Archbishop
of
Canterbury
might
with
as
good
learning
haue
subscribed
to
the
Alcaron
,
as
consent
with
such
Protestants
as
he
did
.
Christianity
denied
in
England
by
publike
authority
.
The
Bishops
betray
the
Ghospel
to
the
Iewes
,
and
agree
with
the
enimies
of
our
Lord
.
Their
Bible
is
inferiour
to
the
Alcaron
.
The
Bishops
notes
betray
our
Lord
and
redeemer
,
and
befoule
the
Rocke
of
saluation
.
They
are
the
very
poison
to
al
the
Ghospel
,
&c.
Now
M.
Doctor
,
you
may
see
your
sincerity
and
integrity
,
vpon
which
you
stand
so
much
,
by
the
difference
there
is
betweene
the
citation
you
vsed
,
and
that
which
I
haue
here
repeated
from
my
Answere
,
and
the
Aduertisement
of
this
your
Morton
reply
pag
.
18.
learned
friend
,
and
companion
in
religion
,
and
so
much
commended
by
your selfe
in
this
place
.
Secondly
,
tel
me
M.
Doctor
;
of
what
religion
you
are
,
a
D.
Morton
his
Religion
most
wicked
or
none
by
his
argument
Protestant
,
or
of
none
at
al
?
or
what
you
would
be
esteemed
?
for
Atheisme
or
some
strange
kinde
of
Infidelity
may
seeme
by
your
writing
(
presently
to
be
recited
)
to
be
your
profession
.
For
first
,
you
affirme
of
this
Aduertiser
and
condemner
of
your
Bible
,
and
Religion
to
be
worse
then
the
Alcaron
,
and
(
consequently
)
Turcisme
,
these
wordes
:
that
he
is
sequestred
from
you
,
(
the
English
Protestants
)
rather
by
impotency
of
passion
,
then
any
difference
in
religion
.
By
which
sentence
,
except
you
wil
deale
plainly
and
say
both
he
and
you
be
of
a
most
wicked
and
lying
religion
,
which
and
more
you
graunt
in
effect
:
(
because
true
religion
cannot
write
so
slaunderously
of
true
religion
,
as
he
hath
done
of
English
Protestancy
,
which
you
practise
;
)
you
haue
graunted
these
and
more
absurdities
against
your self
:
that
Bible
which
you
vse
,
and
Religion
which
you
professe
,
are
worse
then
the
Alcaron
and
Turcisme
;
you
deny
Christianity
;
betray
the
Ghospel
;
agree
with
the
enimies
of
our
Lord
,
&c.
for
these
and
more
straunge
things
are
affirmed
of
your
religion
,
by
that
your
Protestant
,
and
so
much
esteemed
friend
.
Thirdly
,
tel
me
M.
Doctor
,
with
what
species
or
kinde
of
quality
,
Protestant
passions
of
what
vehemency
.
your
wit
&
judgement
was
possessed
,
when
you
wrote
these
thinges
?
were
you
in
a
passion
,
habite
,
power
,
forme
?
or
what
?
be
the
passions
of
Protestants
so
great
,
so
large
,
so
long
,
of
such
force
&
efficacy
,
that
they
doe
not
only
endure
a
short
moment
and
passe
away
(
as
true
passions
doe
;
)
but
dwel
,
inhibite
,
and
continue
with
you
,
in
thinking
,
writing
,
printing
,
and
publishing
of
bookes
,
and
booke
vpon
booke
,
(
as
is
knowne
of
that
your
beloued
Protestant
brother
)
and
al
and
euer
condemning
your
religion
as
I
haue
recited
?
Therefore
,
sincere
and
learned
Sir
,
if
this
man
and
you
be
of
one
religion
(
as
you
say
)
and
you
a
Protestant
,
you
and
your
Protestancy
are
absolutely
guilty
of
most
horrible
Infidelity
.
Againe
,
if
Protestant
impotency
of
passion
is
such
,
of
that
extremity
and
duration
,
that
you
know
not
,
or
care
not
,
what
you
speake
,
write
,
or
publish
,
we
may
lesse
meruaile
at
what
you
haue
written
:
and
nothing
regard
what
you
doe
hereafter
.
In
your
next
citation
,
you
haue
practized
againe
your
former
contracting
faculty
,
drawing
23.
lines
into
fiue
,
and
one
word
.
That
which
you
cite
is
contained
and
repeated
by
you
in
these
wordes
:
That
no
man
,
in
whom
there
is
any
sparke
of
grace
or
conscience
,
Morton
reply
pag
.
19.
can
liue
in
the
Church
of
England
,
whose
inhabitants
be
al
Infidels
,
going
to
the
Churches
of
Bishops
and
Archbishops
,
whose
Gouernement
is
Antichristian
and
Deuilish
.
Hitherto
D.
Mortons
citation
.
But
Sir
,
why
did
you
forget
that
which
followeth
Moderat
.
answ
.
cap
.
2.
§.
The
Admonition
.
Admonit
.
2.
p.
25.
33.
suppl
.
vers
.
56.
in
the
same
place
,
from
the
same
admonishing
Protestant
authority
,
and
is
in
these
tearmes
:
Antichrist
is
among
them
.
It
is
traiterous
against
the
Maiesty
of
Christ
.
It
is
accursed
.
It
is
an
vnlawful
,
false
,
and
bastardly
Gouernement
.
It
shal
be
easier
for
Sodome
and
Gomorrhe
in
the
day
of
iudgement
,
then
for
the
Court
of
Parliament
,
where
the
Protestant
Religion
was
confirmed
:
there
D.
Morton
and
Protestant
writers
(
by
his
argument
)
more
intollerable
in
England
,
then
Priests
&
lesuits
is
no
right
Religion
established
in
England
.
Hitherto
that
Protestant
testimony
of
the
English
Protestant
Church
&
religion
:
Then
M.
Doctor
tel
me
,
what
Catholike
euer
did
,
or
can
more
condemne
you
and
your
religion
,
then
these
Protestants
haue
done
,
and
then
your selfe
haue
done
and
doe
,
joyning
with
these
men
in
religion
.
Then
by
your
argument
Mort
.
reply
pag
.
18.
Barl
.
ag
.
a
nam
.
Cath
.
p.
115
120.
Doue
persw
.
pag
.
31.
Sute
.
ag.
Keliis
.
pag
.
42.
D.
Field
p.
170.
D.
Abbot
ag.
D.
●il
p.
101.
102.
106.
2●6
.
237.
347.
Willet
Antileg
.
p.
275.
Wo●ton
def
.
of
.
P●rk
.
p.
28.
Middleton
papisto
.
p.
201.
Powel
Conlid
.
p
17.
ag.
an
Apologe●ical
epist.
p.
48.
52.
Abridgement
pag
.
39.
your selfe
,
Bishop
Barlow
,
Bishop
Doue
,
D.
Sutcliffe
,
D.
Field
,
D.
Goerge
Abbot
,
D.
Willet
the
Professor
,
M.
Wotton
,
M.
Powel
,
the
Authour
of
the
Protestant
Abridgement
,
and
other
Protestants
in
England
,
at
this
present
publike
writers
among
you
,
(
as
your
writings
t●stifie
)
being
of
the
same
religion
with
these
men
,
which
comdemne
Protestant
English
religion
for
so
vile
a
thing
,
are
as
vnsufferable
(
and
more
by
your
doctrine
)
in
this
Protestant
Kingdome
and
Gouernement
,
as
any
Catholike
Priest
or
Iesuite
.
And
you
with
al
the
rest
recited
,
and
others
are
voide
of
any
sparke
of
grace
or
conscience
,
are
Infidels
,
liue
in
a
Deuilish
Gouernement
of
religion
,
are
traiterous
against
the
Maiesty
of
Christ
,
haue
no
right
Religion
,
&c.
These
and
more
such
inconueniences
,
you
M.
Doctor
a
chiefe
Apologist
and
champion
for
the
English
Protestant
Church
,
haue
heaped
vpon
your
owne
heades
,
by
your
worthy
writing
.
Neither
are
you
either
more
free
from
corruption
,
or
a
more
prudent
disputer
in
that
which
followeth
:
for
in
the
next
citation
,
whereas
I
taxed
D.
Fulke
and
M.
Willet
for
their
straunge
doctrine
,
that
Christ
is
Autotheos
,
God
of
himselfe
,
thus
you
alleage
my
opinion
:
The
denial
of
Christ
to
be
God
,
which
Reply
pag
.
19.
20.
M.
Willet
and
D.
Fulke
d●e
,
denying
Christ
to
haue
receaued
the
substance
of
his
Father
:
or
that
he
is
Deus
de
Deo
;
God
of
God
▪
as
the
first
general
Councels
defined
.
Which
citation
first
hath
no
sence
,
not
being
any
perfect
sentence
,
as
is
manif●st
,
in
that
manner
as
it
is
here
cited
.
Secondly
,
I
am
cited
to
write
,
that
M.
Willet
and
D.
Fulke
doe
deny
Christ
to
be
God
:
Moderat
.
answ
.
c
.
2.
●
.
therefore
first
.
when
my
wordes
be
only
these
:
Philippus
Nicholaus
a
learned
Protestant
Minister
,
and
the
Protestant
Deane
and
College
of
Tubinge
,
bring
in
Luther
pr●phesying
(
as
he
calleth
it
)
that
the
Sacrame●taries
would
neuer
cease
,
vntil
they
denied
Christ
to
be
God
,
which
M.
Willet
and
D.
Fulke
,
and
others
haue
almost
fully
effected
,
denying
Christo
to
haue
receaued
his
substance
of
his
Father
,
or
that
he
is
Deus
de
Deo
,
God
of
God
,
as
the
first
general
Councels
haue
defined
.
Where
I
doe
not
say
(
as
D.
Morton
citeth
me
)
that
M.
Willet
and
D.
Fulke
doe
deny
Christ
to
be
God
;
but
only
th●s
,
that
they
haue
almost
fully
effected
it
.
Which
doth
not
affirme
the
thing
done
,
but
almost
done
.
Thirdly
,
he
citeth
me
to
say
:
Christ
receaued
the
substance
of
his
Father
:
when
my
wordes
be
:
receaued
his
(
that
is
his
owne
)
substance
of
his
Father
.
So
that
if
it
were
in
ordinary
proceedings
,
the
question
is
therby
quite
altered
,
by
this
his
alteration
.
Now
let
vs
come
to
the
learn●d
Diuinit●
of
these
positions
:
Christ
is
God
of
himselfe
:
Christ
hath
his
essen●e
of
himselfe
,
D.
Morton
an
Infidel
by
his
doctrine
.
and
not
of
his
Father
,
&c.
as
these
Protestants
tel
vs
:
(
for
concerning
D.
Mortons
vsage
towardes
Cardinal
Bellarmine
,
he
hath
heard
sufficiently
from
his
●ther
aduersary
:
)
wherefore
briefly
thus
I
argue
in
this
question
.
If
Christ
hath
only
his
Person
,
and
not
his
substance
of
his
Father
,
but
this
essentially
of
himselfe
,
as
these
Protestants
affirme
:
Then
the
person
and
substance
in
Christ
must
needes
be
essentially
and
really
diuers
;
because
that
which
is
essentially
receaued
,
and
that
which
is
not
receaued
,
but
one
hath
it
of
himselfe
,
must
needes
be
really
distinct
:
But
this
destroieth
the
mistery
of
the
Trinity
,
and
the
nature
of
God
,
making
real
composition
in
God
,
most
simple
;
and
further
proueth
three
Gods
:
because
there
must
needes
be
three
distinct
essences
,
which
maketh
three
Gods
.
For
if
the
Sonne
hath
his
essence
of
himselfe
,
then
the
holy
Ghost
also
,
then
euery
person
aswel
that
of
the
Father
,
the
Sonne
,
and
holy
Gh●st
being
distinct
really
,
and
hauing
essences
thus
really
distinct
,
they
make
three
Gods
.
Secondly
,
because
wheresoeuer
there
is
a
substance
in
God
,
there
is
a
person
,
(
which
is
not
really
distinguished
from
one
another
;
)
by
this
diuinity
it
must
needes
follow
,
that
there
is
no
generation
,
no
procession
,
and
consequently
no
Father
begetting
,
no
Sonne
begotten
,
no
holy
Ghost
proceeding
:
And
so
againe
either
three
Gods
,
or
no
God
at
al.
Thirdly
,
howsoeuer
the
case
standeth
by
their
doctrine
;
that
God
which
these
Protestants
haue
made
,
must
be
such
an
aggregatum
per
accidens
,
that
no
Infidels
in
the
world
were
at
any
time
greater
Idolaters
,
then
those
Christians
,
which
worship
such
a
God
,
which
be
these
Protestants
.
And
because
D.
Morton
hath
Diuinity
of
as
straunge
a
nature
,
in
an
other
place
of
his
writings
;
which
is
,
that
Pater
est
trinus
v●us
:
Th●
Morton
1.
part
.
Apolog
.
concl
.
in
fine
.
Father
is
three
and
one
:
Thus
I
must
instruct
him
of
this
matter
:
if
that
position
is
true
,
then
seing
in
this
mistery
there
is
only
essence
and
persons
,
the
Father
must
needes
be
either
three
persons
and
one
essence
,
or
three
essences
and
one
person
.
If
the
first
,
then
there
is
no
person
of
the
Sonne
,
or
of
the
holy
Ghost
:
because
the
Father
is
supposed
by
this
doctrine
to
haue
three
,
and
in
the
whole
Trinity
there
neither
be
,
nor
can
be
more
,
for
so
it
should
not
be
a
Trinity
,
but
a
Quadruplity
,
Quinquplity
,
Sexuphty
,
and
except
we
should
likewise
diuide
them
into
their
Triplicities
,
and
make
9.
persons
in
Diuinity
.
If
D.
Morton
meaneth
the
second
,
of
one
person
,
and
three
essences
,
or
substances
,
in
the
Father
;
then
the
Father
himselfe
must
needes
be
three
Gods
,
because
the
substance
is
not
many
,
except
the
things
(
in
this
case
Gods
)
be
many
:
Then
seing
there
is
equality
in
this
mistery
,
and
the
Sonne
and
holy
Ghost
be
equal
to
the
Father
,
there
must
n●edes
be
9.
Gods
,
by
the
Diuinity
of
this
learned
Doctor
.
And
other
absurde
inferences
which
may
be
demonstratiuely
made
from
hence
are
too
many
irreligious
,
vnchristian
or
Athe●stical
to
bee
published
in
writing
.
After
this
M.
Doctor
reboundeth
backe
againe
two
leaues
Reply
pag
.
23.
at
the
least
;
and
in
his
citation
vseth
his
old
art
of
penetration
,
condensing
40.
lines
in
14.
And
yet
the
contents
is
of
that
Reply
p.
23.
24.
force
and
efficacy
,
that
by
his
owne
judgement
,
it
stoppeth
the
clamours
of
Protestants
against
Catholike
Priests
:
And
yet
in
these
few
lines
his
sincere
dealing
is
in
this
manner
;
In
the
first
three
lines
he
maketh
none
or
a
defectiue
sence
.
In
the
fourth
and
fift
he
citeth
me
to
say
:
We
doe
not
esteeme
the
Protestants
Reply
pag
.
23.
of
England
in
the
case
of
Heretikes
:
where
he
quite
leaueth
out
the
substantial
point
of
the
question
,
that
is
,
Heretikes
to
whom
al
ciuil
society
is
to
be
denied
,
as
D.
Morton
objected
:
wherevpon
my
answere
and
wordes
be
:
These
societies
are
not
to
be
Moderat
.
answ
.
6.
2.
§.
the
rest
.
denied
to
the
Protestants
of
England
,
because
we
doe
not
esteeme
them
in
that
case
of
Heretikes
and
excommunicates
.
Besides
this
,
he
quite
omitteth
the
chiefest
reasons
of
that
section
;
And
yet
that
which
he
citeth
is
of
such
effect
and
purpose
,
that
it
enforceth
him
to
these
wordes
,
to
his
owne
confusion
:
If
al
your
sect
would
allow
your
answere
,
we
should
neede
no
clamour
.
Therefore
seing
my
answere
is
so
generally
allowed
,
as
is
shewed
before
,
and
this
man
is
not
ignorant
thereof
,
al
his
clamours
in
his
Positious
,
his
counterfaite
Ful
satisfaction
,
his
Preamble
to
a
further
Encounter
,
and
the
Encounter
it selfe
(
if
it
proue
not
an
Abortiue
)
are
needlesse
clamours
,
and
with
the
shame
of
this
Doctor
,
and
such
Protestant
accusers
,
to
be
recalled
and
reca●ted
.
And
thus
I
haue
passed
ouer
al
his
citations
,
which
I
promised
to
examine
,
only
one
the
last
consisting
but
of
three
lines
,
excepted
:
And
to
justifie
my
former
assertion
,
that
they
be
al
more
or
lesse
corrupted
,
this
also
leaueth
out
the
chiefest
Reply
pag
.
25.
and
most
effectual
wordes
:
(
In
whose
Dominions
they
be
in
force
)
in
which
a
great
efficacy
of
the
sentence
consisted
.
So
that
without
any
one
exception
,
he
hath
corrupted
and
falsified
my
answere
in
euery
citation
,
in
defence
of
his
first
Syllogisme
,
which
he
planted
as
the
ground
and
foundation
of
al.
And
as
I
haue
clearely
demonstrated
in
euery
one
of
these
●itations
,
his
ignorance
,
corruption
,
falsyfication
,
or
prophane
proceedings
:
So
it
is
as
easie
to
proceede
to
the
end
of
his
reply
:
And
I
shal
remaine
most
ready
and
willing
(
if
it
be
required
)
to
proue
or
defend
against
him
,
that
not
the
fourth
part
of
those
which
follow
,
for
defence
of
his
Syllogismes
,
are
free
from
corruption
or
shameful
vsage
:
But
these
are
more
then
sufficient
,
to
proue
this
Doctor
guilty
of
the
crimes
objected
.
The
conclusion
of
this
Treatise
.
WHerefore
seing
the
successe
of
this
sincere
,
learned
,
and
true
dealing
Doctor
,
hath
beene
so
vnfortunate
,
that
euen
by
the
judgement
of
himselfe
,
and
his
dearest
Protestant
friends
,
whatsoeuer
he
hath
written
in
this
kinde
hath
thus
proued
to
his
owne
shame
and
reproach
;
And
that
(
accordingly
as
is
cited
from
him
)
his
clamours
should
cease
:
At
the
last
I
request
him
,
to
stand
to
the
last
wordes
and
Conclusion
of
this
his
examined
Syllogisme
,
(
the
ground
of
al
his
expresse
dogmatical
Reply
pag
.
2●
.
principles
:
)
which
be
these
:
But
to
conclude
with
your
owne
wordes
,
those
duties
are
not
to
be
denied
vnto
Protestants
.
It
were
wel
if
either
you
writ
as
you
thought
,
or
that
your
Doctors
did
thinke
as
you
write
:
(
whereof
M.
Morton
is
assured
before
)
And
so
should
we
haue
lesse
cause
of
scruples
,
to
feare
either
you
or
them
.
If
he
should
not
performe
my
desire
,
but
be
stil
clamorous
against
his
owne
graunt
and
conscience
,
or
make
new
feares
or
scruples
,
(
as
himselfe
tearmeth
them
)
I
hope
his
clamours
,
feares
,
and
scruples
,
wil
be
little
offensiue
vnto
others
,
or
regarded
of
any
,
being
so
authentically
before
condemned
by
himselfe
,
to
be
needlesse
,
and
without
cause
.
Which
hath
beene
proued
in
the
whole
passage
of
this
my
examination
:
wherein
appeareth
,
not
only
that
he
is
conuinced
to
b●
so
notorious
,
and
infamous
a
corrupter
,
forger
,
falsyfier
,
and
irreligious
slaunderer
,
accuser
,
and
shifter
in
this
businesse
,
of
so
great
importance
,
euen
by
his
owne
and
his
adherents
D.
Willets
great
Synops
.
against
Catholikes
,
of
what
credit
by
Protestants
.
judgement
:
But
al
his
bookes
of
this
kinde
are
such
,
that
I
may
safely
say
of
them
as
M.
Parkes
writeth
of
his
Brother
M.
Doctor
Willet
,
hi●
worthy
Synopsis
whereof
he
had
gloried
so
much
in
these
wordes
:
Parkes
against
Lymbomasti●
.
pag
.
7.
Euen
that
great
worke
,
whereof
you
boast
and
presume
so
much
,
I
meane
your
general
view
of
Papistry