Nowe what shal I say of your logike and exact kind of reasoning ? As there is nothing in a writer more requisit , M. Horn● Logike . that meaneth truly , so the more you haue broken the rules therof , the more is your shame , and the lesse ought the credit of your whole Booke to be . I neede not descend to the particulars , your perpetuall maner of writing being suche , as your whole discourse seemeth nothing els but a mishapen lumpe of lewde and loose argumentes . For this being the matter which you haue taken in hande to proue by the examples of other Princes , and by the practise of Councells , that the Laye Magistrates are Supreme Gouernours in all Ecclesiastical causes , this vniuersall proposition being that which should be concluded , your premisses are allwaies mere particulars : your proufes procede euer of some one fact or matter Ecclesiastical , but neuer of all : And yet those matters that you bring , being partly no Ecclesiastical matters at all , partly vntruly fathered vppon the laye Magistrate . So that , as euer you faile in truth of matter , so you neuer make good forme of argument . And you can tell your selfe : ( they be your owne wordes ) that younge Logicians knowe , Answer . fol. 108. a. this is an euil consequent , that concludeth vpon one or diuerse particulars affirmatiuely an vniuersal . This euil consequent M. Horn , is the only consequent that you make in all your booke , where you play the Opponents parte . Answer . fol. 4. fol. 100. fol. 105. For the which I referre you and the Reader to the three first bookes of this Reply . With the like good logique you lay forthe false definitions and false diuisions of your owne Inuention .

M. Horns Rhetorik As for your Rhetorike , you worke your matters so handsomly and so persuasiuely , that there is not almost any one Scripture , any story , any Councel , any Father , any Author that you alleage , which maketh not directly against your purpose , and beareth withal an expresse and euident testimony for the Popes Supremacy , not only otherwher , but euen in the very same place and allegation that you alleage and grounde your selfe vpon . And this chaunceth not once or twise , but in a maner customably , as by perusing this Reply , you shal soone perceyue . And therefore I wil not specially note it here vnto you , as a rare or seldome thinge . Neither will I thanke you for bringing to our handes so good stuffe to proue our principall purpose by , but say herein vnto you , as S. Augustin sayd in the like case of the Donatistes , alleaging the workes of Optatus , by the which they were euer confounded , and the Catholikes cause maruailously furdered . Nec tamen ipsis , Aug. cont. Dona. post Collation . cap. 34. sed Deo potius hinc agimus gratias : vt enim illa omnia vel loquendo , vel legendo pro causa nostra promerent , atque propalarent , veritas eos torsit , non charitas inuitauit . Neither doe we yet thanke them for their so doing , but rather God . For that they should bring forth and vtter either by talke , or by alleaging , al those thinges for our matter , the Truth forced them , not any Charity inuited them . And truly so M. Horn , that by your own Authors you are euer confounded , the Truthe of our cause forceth you , as not being able to alleage any Author that maketh not for vs , not any good wil to our cause or to vs moued you .

Againe what a newe Cicero , or Demosthenes are you , that laye forth to M. Fekenham , as a good and a persuasible motiue , to enduce him to take the Othe of the Princes Primacy , the former erroneous doinges of certayne Reuerend Fathers , whereof they haue so farre repented , that for refusal of this Othe thei haue suffred depriuation , and haue and doe suffer imprisonment , and are ready besides , by Gods assistance , patiently to suffer , whatsoeuer Gods prouidence hath gratiously prouided for them ? Wherevnto both they and other haue good cause much the more to be encouraged , considering that after al this struggling and wrastling against the Truth by you and your felowes M. Iewel and the rest , the Truth is daily more and more opened , illustred , and confirmed . And your contrary doctrine is or ought to be disgraced and brought in vtter discredit , with such as doe but indifferently weigh the most wretched and miserable handling of the holy Fathers and Councelles before by M. Iewel , as al Englande knoweth , and nowe by you Maister Horne , which are not much inferior to him in that pointe of legerdemayne . For as in his most lying Reply against D. Harding , so in this your Answer to M. Fekenhams treatise , there is neither Scripture , nor Councel , nor doctour , nor any thing els that cometh through your hands , which you doe not miserably mangle , corrupte , and peruerte : and that by a number of dishonest and shameful shifts : which particularly to specifie would be to long and tediouse .

M. Horns miserable peruerting of his authours . But to say somwhat for an example , the principall parte of all your shifting standeth in a certaine meruelouse kind of a newe and a false Arithmetike , somtime by Addition , sometime by diminution and Detraction .

By addition . Thus to make your matter of the Princes Supreme gouernement in al ecclesiastical causes more probable , 1. Answer fo. 20. b. Reply fo. 88. b. you interlace twise these woordes ( as one that had the cure and authoritie ouer all ) and againe , in the same leaf ( as one that had authoritie ouer them ) which you finde not in your Authours . 2. Answer fo. 22. ● . Reply . fo. 98. b.

Thus you shuffle in this pretye sillable ( All ) to Socrates , and againe to Theodoretus . 3. Answer fol. 24. b. Reply . fol. 107. b.

So you springle in these woordes ( by his supreame authoritie ) to your narration out of the saied Theodoretus . 4. Answer fol. 26. a. Replie fol. 115 b. And by and by to your narration out of Sozomenus , these woordes ( and the Bishops could not remoue him . ) 5. Answer Fol. 26 b Replie Fol. 116. b

So you adde to Liberatus this woorde ( depose : 6. Answer fo 30. a. Replie Fol. 128. b ) And to the Actes of the Chalcedon Councell , these woordes , 7. Answer Fol. 32. b Reply . Fol. 144 a ( which otherwise must be deposed . ) And to the Actes of the sixt Generall Councell these woordes ( to examine and confirme . 8. Answer fol. 53. b. Replie . fo. 216. b.

You thrust into the narration of Antoninus and Marius , 9. Answer fol. 81. a Replie fol. 334. a ) that which they say not : and to the narration of Quintinus Heduus fyue ful lines , that are not in your author touching Pope Iohn the .22 . and many other like things otherwhere . 10. Answer fol. 89. b Replie fol. 378 , b

And yet I can not tel , whether your peruersity be more in your false multiplication , By Diminution . or in your false diminution . 1. Answer fol 19. b Replie fol. 33. a In framing the state of the question by the statutes of the realme , you leaue out the beginninge and the ende of the Statute . You leaue out of Marcians oration .ij. or .iij. woordes , that make moste againste you . 2. Answer fol. 33. a Reply fo. 147. a You pare awaye from the sentence that your selfe reherseth out of the fourthe Romaine councel , 3. Answer Fol. 36. Replie Fol. 162. the tayle of it immediatly following your own words : that is , Totam causam Dei iudicio reseruantes , quite ouerthrowing your newe supremacy .

4. Answer fo. 37. b. Replie Fol. 167. a. In like maner from the narration of the ambassadry of Pope Iohn , you conceale the necessary circumstances of the same : as you doe from many otber narrations , the which being truely set in , doe vtterly destroye al your vntrue assertions . 5. Answer Fo. 4● . a. Reply . fo. Fol. 179. b After this sorte to these woordes of Iustinian the Emperour ( these things we haue determined ) you choppe in of your owne ( by sentence ) and withal choppe awaye that which immediatly followeth , sanctorum Patrum Canones sequuti .

In this maner whereas throughout your booke , one of your great matters to proue Emperours and Kinges supreme heades of the Churche , 6. Answer fol 74. & fo 78. a Replie . fo. Fol. 282. a. & . 306. a. is the inuesturing of bishops ( which yet neuerthelesse is but an impertinent matter ) you tell vs stil of this inuesturing , and make a great busie nedelesse sturre about it , but that the said Emperor or King , as for example Charlemaine , Otho the first , and other receyued that priuilege from the See of Rome , and againe that other Emperours and Kinges , as for example , th emperour Henry the .5 . in Germany , and in England King Henry the first , yelded afterwarde , and gaue ouer the said inuesturing , which things appere aswel by other Authors , as by your owne that your selfe alleageth , you passe them ouer with great silence . For yf you had tolde these and such like stories of the inuesturing of Bisshops truely and fully , then had your newe supremacy bene quite distroyed . 7. Answer fo. 80 b. Reply fo. 330. a.

For the saied cause , whereas you telle , vs that Philip the Frenche kinge swore the Pope to certaine conditions , you altogether dissemble , what those conditions were . 8. Answer fo. 106. a. Reply . fo. 448. a.

For the same cause , you leaue out of your Author Io. Anth. Delphinus in the midle of the sentence , a line or two : Least that yf you had sincerely sette in those woordes , they would haue ouerthrowen your fonde , folishe and heretical paradoxe , that the Authoritye to excommunicate appertayneth neither to Bishop , nor Priest .

Wel , to sette a side ( least we be to tediouse ) all other places of like corruption ( which plentifuly abunde euery where in your aunswere ) we will only touche , of a greate number , two or thre , apperteining to our own domesticall stories .

You will proue to vs , that King Henry the first was supreme head of the Churche of Englanda : nd why trowe you ? Forsoth because the spiritual condescended , in a Councel at London , that the Kings officiers should punish Priestes for whoredome . Is not this I praye you an importante and a mighty argumente , to proue the Kings supremacye by , which rather directly proueth the cleargies supremacye , of whome the Kinge had this authoritye ? And yet such are your accustomable arguments , as may sone appere to the reader . But this is not the thinge we nowe seeke for : 9. Answer fol. 77. a Replie fo. 199 , a but to knowe , what kinde of whoredome it was , that the Priests should be punisshed for . Lo this , though you alleage . 7. marginal authors , durste you not ones touche . For yf you had , you had withall proued your own whoredome , and such as is much worse then was theirs .

10. Answer fol. 89. b Replie fo. 380 , a Againe you labour to proue by Browghton a temporal Lawier , that by the Lawe of the realme , the King was then taken for supreme head of the Church , for that all are vnder the King , and the Kinge is vnder God only , but you most shamefully dissemble , that the said Browghton speaketh but of the Kings authority in temporal things : and that in the place by your self alleaged , he saith , that as Emperours and Kings are the chiefe rulers for temporal things : so for spiritual things the Pope , is the chief ruler , and vnder him , Archbisshops , Bisshops and other .

But of al other Lyes , this that we shal nowe shewe is one most Capitayne , and notable . Of al stories by you most miserably and wretchedly pinched , pared , and dismembred , the storie of our first and noble Christian King Lucius , is most shamefully contaminated , depraued , and deformed . The consent of al stories as wel Domesticall as externall , yea as wel of Catholikes as of heretikes ( as farre as I can yet by diligente searche , possibly finde ) is , that the saied Kinge Lucius was ch●istened by the helpe , aduice , and instruction of Pope Eleutherius . But you M. Horne beare such a spitefull and malitiouse hart to the Pope , and to the See of Rome , that contrarye to the narration of all other , yea of your owne dere brother Bale ( the cheife antiquarye of Englishe Protestantes ) you auouche , that he and his subiectes were baptized , and that he reformed the Heathnishe religion , and did other thinges , 11. Answer fol. 93. b Replie fol. 397 , that you reherse out of Polidore , without any Authoritie , knowledge or consent of the Pope . And yet beside all other , your owne authour Polidorus , sayeth , that he was christened , and the prophane worshippinge of the false Gods was banyshed , and other thinges done by the admonition , helpe , and aduice of the said Pope Eleutherius Ambassadours . And therefore you rehersing Polidorus woordes of the saide Kinge Lucius moste falsly and lewdely , doe cutte awaye from Polidorus his sentence ( by your selfe recyted ) all that euer Polidorus writeth of Pope Eleutherius and his Legats .

I truste Maister Horne , that , when any indifferente Reader hath well considered , these and suche other like partes , that euery where you playe in this your Aunswere , and withall , the cancred and maliciouse harte that you beare to the Apostolicall See of Rome , which most euidently bursteth out in the handling of the foresayde story of Lucius , he shall fynde good cause to take yowe as you are , false and maliciouse , and not to trust the reporte of such a partial writer , yea of such an euident falsary . Answer fol. 47. a. & fol. 55. But it is no newes for a man of your coate , to be partial in Popes matters , or to cal the Pope himself the childe of perdition , or to terme his lawful doings , Horrible practises , as you doe .

Answer fol. 101. b. Reply . fol. 435. a. & 436. b. But to auouche him to be a more periculous enemy to Christ , then the Turke , and that Popery is much more idolatrous , then Turkery , I thinke you are the first English protestant , that euer wrote so Turkishly . Such Turkish trechery might better haue bene borne in the lauishing language of your hotte spurred Ministers in pulpit , then in the aduised writing of a prelate of the Garter in printe . With the like discretion you cal blessed S. Augustin , of whome we Englishmen first receyued our Christendome , in contempt and derision , Answer fol. 58. & 59. the Popes Apostle , maligning in him the name of the Apostle of Englande , and calling him beside , together with the blessed Apostle of Germany and Martyr , Bonifacius , blinde guides and blinde bussardes . But who so bolde as blinde bayarde ? or who can see lesse in other men , then such as can see nothing in themselues ? And what doe you els herein , but like a furious Aiax , thinking to deface the Pope , fall a whipping and rayling at his shepe , ( such shepe , I say as Christ committed to Peter , whose successour the Pope is ) as Aiax in his fury whipped the shepe of Vlisses , thinking he had whipped Vlisses himselfe ? But as the fury of Aiax reached not to Vlysses person , but onely encreased his owne misery and madnes : so your Turkish talke M. Horne , blemisheth not the See Apostolike , or hurteth it the valewe of one rushe , but only expresseth the Turkish sprit that lurketh within you . Therefore bluster and blowe , fume and frete , raue and raile , as lowdely as lewdely , as bestly as boldly , do what you can , you must heare , as the Donatists hearde of S. Augustine : Ipsa est Sedes , August . in Psal. cont. partem Dona . Tom. 7. quam superbae non vincunt inferorum portae . That See of Peter , is the See , which the proude gates of hel doe not ouercome . The more you kick against that Rock , the more your break your shinne .

You bluster not so boysterously against the Pope , as you lie most lewdely vpon the right Reuerent , and lerned Father M. Fekenham , whose person you impugne , for lacke of iuste matter , with most slaunderous Reproches . Answer fol. 2. a. As where you say of him , that the Catholikes had euer a feare of his reuolting , that , Fol. 7. & fol. 104. fol. 3. b. he semed in a maner resolued and satisfied in this matter , that , his doinges should be a preparation of rebellion to the Quenes Maiesties person , and that , Fol. 6. a. he wissheth the Pope should reigne in her place , that he maketh his belly his God , that he promised to recante in Kinge Edwardes daies , and last of all , Fol. 7. b. Fol. 128. a. that he chaunged in Religion .ix. times , yea .xix. times . These be such slaunderous Reproches M. Horne , and the person whome you burden them withall , so farre from all suspicion of any such foule matter , among all such as these many yeres haue knowen him and his behauiour , that yf you were sued hereof vpon an Action of the case , as you well deserue no lesse , considering of what vocation and true deserued reputation he is , whome thus vilainouslye you slaunder , you woulde I feare be driuen at the lest , to doe that at Paules Crosse , which about Waltham matters ( you knowe them est your selfe ) the Regestre of Hampshiere was driuen at that place to doe . So should the gospell be fulfilled , Mr th . 7. Looke with what measure you haue measured to other , with the same it shal be measured again to you . And so should Lex talionis in you wel and worthely take place . As it doth by Gods ꝓuidence fal out vpon you , in that you tel your Reader in great sadnes , Reply fo. 5● . that M. Fek. is a great Donatist . For by that occasion you shal find your self and your felowes M. Horn most rightly and truly proued Donatists : and M.F. to be as far from that lewde sect , as you are from a true Catholike .

But of al your other slaunderous lyes heaped moste wrongefully vpon M.F. this one which to omit the rest , I wil onelye now note , is most ridiculous . You bluster exceedingly , and are in a vehement rage with Maister Fekenham . Answer fol. 128. col. 2. & 129 col . 1. Replie . Fol. 5.7 . You say that if his friends would but a litle examine his false dealing with the Fathers , thei would no longer beleue him , but suspect him as a deepe dissembler , or rather abhorre him as an open slaunderer and belier of the Auncient Fathers . And to exemplifie this greuous accusation , you tel him in that place , that he manifestlie mangleth , altereth , peruerteth , and corrupteth a saying of S. Augustin . A man would here suppose M. Horn , that you had some great and iuste occasion , thus greuously to charge such a man as M. Fekenham is , and that in printe , where all the worlde may reade it and consider it . What is the place then ? Thus it is . M. Fekenham alleageth S. Augustine saying thus . Istis cede , & mihi cedes : yelde to these , and you shall yelde to me . You say S. Augustine hath no suche wordes , but thus . Istis cede , & me non caedes . Yelde to these , and thou shalt not strike or whippe me . Nowe put the case , it were as you say . Doth this Alteration or chaunge deserue such a greuous Accusation ? You confesse your selfe in the same place , and doe say to M. Fekenham : And yet this corrupting of the sentence maketh it serue no whit the more for your purpose . And is then M. Fekenham to be abhorred of his frendes for an open slaunderer and belier of the Auncient Fathers , when he so altereth them , that yet they make nothing for him ? Who seeth not , that in case . M. Fekenham had altered the wordes of S. Augustin , yet seing he got nothing by the exchaunge , nor vsed them to any guile or deceyuing of his Reader , he litle deserued such a greuous Accusation . Fol. 527. & sequent .

But nowe so it is , as I haue in this Replie more amplye declared , that the woordes by Maister Fekenham alleaged , are the true wordes of S. Augustin according to foure seueral prints that I haue sene : two of Paris , one of Basil , an other of Lyons . And the words as you would haue them read Maister Horne , are in none of those printes at all in the text of S. Augustine . Onely in the later print of Paris . An. 1555. those wordes by you auouched stand in the margin as a diuers reading , and the woordes by M. Fekenham avouched stande in the text , as they doe in all other printes beside , for the true text of S. Augustin . And who seeth not nowe , that all this was but a quarel picked , without desert ? And you M. Horne to haue shewed your selfe a most ridiculous wrangler ?

But Gods name be blissed . The dealing of Catholike writers is so vpright , that such smal occasions must be picked , and vpon such trifles your Rhetorike must be bestowed : els against their dealing you haue nothing to say .

With the like felicity your brother Iewel in his late Sermon the .15 . of Iune last at Paules Crosse , layed ful stoutely and confidently to D. Hardings charge , for alleaging the Decades of Sabellicus : saying with great brauery , but with exceding foly , that Sabellicus neuer wrote Decades , but only Aeneades : Wheras yet al that euer haue sene Sabellicus , do know ; that he wrote of his Rapsodia , Aeneades : and of Venice matters , Decades : which booke with the very page of the booke D. Harding truly alleaged . Whereby it is euident , that M. Iewel either is extreme rechelesse and vtterly carelesse what he preacheth or printeth , or at the leaste is at a full point to lie on , as he hath begunne , whatsoeuer come of it . Of the which minde also it semeth your self are M. Horn. For ( to omitte other specialities , as of a a Fol. 127 120. & 123. Reply 451. a. framing arguments vpon M. Fekenhams discourse , which he neuer framed , nor the discourse beareth , of b b Answer fo. 96.97.105 . et 207 Reply . 411. b. 416 a. 447. a. 451. b. your contradictions , whereby you shewe the vnstablemesse of your own iudgement , with such like ) your Aunswer is so fraighted and stuffed with falshoods , your Vntruthes doe so swarme and muster all a long your book , that for the quantity of your Treatise , you are comparable to M. Iewel .

Your Vntruthes amounte to the number of six hundred fourescore and odde . They be so notorious and so many , that it pitieth me in your behalfe , to remembre them . But the places be euident and crie Corruption , and maye by no shift be denied .

If my curiosyty in noting them displease you , let the vttering of them first displease your self , and then you will the lesse be displeased with me . You knowe , M. Iewel hath ledde vs this daunce . Be not angry M. Horne , if we follow the round . Moderat your penne better . Report your Authours more sincerelye . Translate your allegations more truly . Laye downe the whole sentences without concealing of such matter as ouerthroweth your purpose : Say no more then you finde in the Stories . Slaunder not your betters . Deale more aduisedly and vprightly . So shal your Vntruthes be the fewer an other time . But so wil your cause , I assure you M. Horne , come forthe starke naked , feble , and miserable . The beauty and force of your Cause consisteth and dependeth altogether of lyes and vntruthes .

If you ioyne obstinacy to folie , as Maister Iewell doth , so shamefully in open Sermon iustifying him selfe , but not clering him selfe of any one of so many hundred Vntruths iustlye and rightly layed to his charge : then as I saied before , I may iustly say , that you are at a point to lie , whatsoeuer come of it . Like as a protestant of late dayes being pressed of a Catholike for extreme lying , and not being hable to clere him selfe , saied plainely and bluntlye : Quamdiu potero , Vide Remundum Rufum . in Duplicatione cont. Patronum Molinaei . Fol. 76. clades adferam , Latebunt quamdiu poterunt . Valebunt apud vulgus ista mendacia . Well . I wil deface them ( meaning the Catholikes ) and doe some mischiefe to them as longe as I am able . My lies shall lie hidde , as longe as maye be . And at the leste the common people shall fall in a lyking with them .

If you be at this pointe , then knowing where to haue you , we knowe also what to make of you , and for suche to esteme you . A false Prophet , and a lying Master , such as S. Peter spake of , bringing in wicked and damnable sectes . 2 Pet. 2. God geue them grace , which are deceiued by you , so well to knowe you , as we that doe examine your writinges , haue good Cause to knowe you .

This your Aunswer M. Horne ( as I vnderstand ) you haue presented to diuers of the Quenes Maiest . most Honorable Councell , intending thereby not onely to discredit Maister Fekenham , and to increase his trouble , but also to bring into displeasure , all other the Queenes Highnes Catholike subiectes : of which full many , onelye for conscience sake , haue refused , and doe yet refuse the Othe that you here moste ignorantlye defende . For this purpose also at the verye ende of your booke , you referre as it were the whole matter to the most Honorables saying .

To Conclude , by the premisses it maie appeare to the Honorable as by a taste , what sinceritie there is in you . Thus much you say for discrediting of M. Fekenham .

You adde a greuous Accusation against al the Catholik subiects of England , saying . And lastlie your quarreling by spreading this booke , was and is to impugne and barke against the Q. Maiest . Lawful and due Authoritie , which you and your complices dailie labour to subuert : which matter I refer to be further considered by the graue wisedom of the most Honorable . And with this poisoned and cancred Reproch you end your whole book : geuing your Reader to vnderstand that the very end and scope of your book was to ingraffe in the Noble hartes of the most Honorables a great misliking and heauie displeasure , not only of and against M. Fek. already in trouble , but also of and against the whole number of Catholikes : who haue alwaies continewed and shewed themselues the Quenes Maiest . moste loyal and obedient subiects , and haue deserued no such Reproche at your handes M. Horne .

You haue therefore M. Horn , in this Reply , a iust and a ful defence , partly * * See the 3. Chapter of the .1 . booke . against your most slanderous accusation , but chiefly and especially of the whole Cause and Question in Controuersy . As you did to M. Fekenhams Treatise , so I to your Aunswer haue replied through out . I haue not omitted any one parte or parcel of your whole book . As I haue here printed againe the whole , to encrease of charges , so haue I answered the whole , to edifying of the Reader .

If by this Reply you find your self satisfied , and are content to yelde to the Truth , so euidently and abundantly opened vnto you , than both I and al other Catholikes will both better trust you , and geue God thankes for you .

But if after the perusing of this Reply , you shal think you are not fully and in euery point confuted : I wishe that the most Honorable , to whom so confidently you commend your own doings , woulde commaunde you , to proue it so to the worlde by a ful Reioyndre . A ful Reioyndre I say , and perfect , to al and euery part of this Reply , as I haue here replied to al and euery part of your Answer : not omitting any one example , of Councel , Prince , or Countrie by you alleged . And that you put in my whole Answer , not omitting any one line or sentence , either of the text , or of the margent .

If the Truth be on your side , you haue no cause to stick hereat . You wil seme to wante no learning . Abylytieto beare the charges we are sure you want not .

Goe thorough therefore as you haue begun , with this faire building of yours , if you thinke your foundation good , or the cause which you ground vpon sure . Goe through I say , that it may appere you haue geuen M. F. good cause to remoue his scruples , and to be persuaded at your handes .

Els if you now draw backe , and think by silence to drown the matter , first for your faire peece of worke , so shamefully broken of , men wil laugh you to skorne , as the ghospel by the parable told you : Then al men may knowe , that your great vauntes of your Waltham talke and reasoning , are but wordes of course to saue your poore honour , I shoulde say , honestly . Thirdly , that M. Fekenhams scruples are most lerned and inuincible reasons . And last of al , that the Othe which you so earnestly persuade him to take , can of noman be taken without manifest Periury . Whereof enseweth , that you most horribly offend Gods Diuine Maiesty , which doe burden mens consciences with such euident periury . The worste that I wishe you M. Horne , is , that you retracte your haynous heresies , and proue a true Christian . And thus for this tyme I take my leaue of you .