A
Resolve
of
the
Person
of
the
KING
.
OR
A
Corrector
of
the
Answerer
to
the
Speech
out
of
Doores
.
Iustifying
the
worthy
Speech
of
Mr.
THOMAS
CHALONER
a
faithfull
Member
of
the
Parlement
of
England
.
Courtly
Sir
:
YOu
are
much
mistaken
:
the
answer
you
make
to
your
own
questions
doe
not
satisfie
;
there
are
indeed
that
aske
who
you
are
?
and
what
you
meane
?
and
they
conclude
you
to
be
one
that
was
an
earwitnesse
of
that
worthy
gentlemans
speech
,
else
,
what
meanes
that
parenthesis
in
the
12.
line
,
of
the
second
page
,
of
your
paper
,
and
the
rather
because
you
seem'd
to
be
bitten
by
the
Dogge
that
is
not
worth
the
whisling
after
,
and
make
an
out-crie
upon
't
?
but
deal
as
clearely
as
you
can
;
is
it
not
an
ill
Dogge
that
is
not
worth
the
whisling
after
?
Or
is
there
any
but
children
,
mad-men
or
worse
,
that
take
care
for
such
as
byte
,
destroy
,
doe
mischiefe
,
or
foule
the
house
?
As
for
the
debate
at
the
Comoedie
in
Oxford
,
concrening
the
fittest
place
for
the
Kings
Throne
,
the
determination
whereof
was
so
difficult
,
that
some
thought
it
best
to
erect
none
at
all
;
it
is
a
very
instructive
passage
,
and
may
teach
to
purpose
,
though
your
grand
Master
will
give
you
small
thanks
for
declaring
thereof
without
doores
:
if
a
just
application
be
made
thereof
,
what
thankes
you
deserve
,
you
shall
be
sure
of
;
shall
you
not
?
You
say
you
are
one
that
hath
adhered
to
the
Parlement
all
along
,
(
it
were
well
if
all
alike
)
from
the
beginning
of
the
warre
;
what
a
thousand
pitties
,
it
is
your
name
was
forgotten
!
had
you
only
affixed
that
to
your
paper
;
every
man
would
have
recounted
the
great
service
you
have
done
:
were
you
a
shamed
of
your
name
?
or
were
you
not
?
You
know
it
is
not
faire
to
answer
a
thing
that
hath
a
name
,
without
a
name
.
You
say
you
have
served
the
Parlement
faithfully
in
their
lowest
condition
;
t
was
pitty
you
had
not
goodnesse
sufficient
to
hold
out
to
the
end
;
but
it
seemes
you
did
(
as
some
others
)
about
the
time
of
Branfords-Skirmish
,
dis-relish
the
exigent
;
&
though
you
fac't
not
quite
about
to
Oxford
,
yet
you
fac't
to
Kingston
,
&
have
look
't
on
ever
since
,
and
sometime
have
cast
an
eye
as
far
as
Uxbridge
,
have
you
not
?
Nay
,
you
are
a
Champion
for
the
Parlement
,
Resolving
to
be
still
for
them
in
that
which
is
just
&
right
,
against
any
Person
or
Nation
in
the
World
:
By
any
meanes
make
your
name
publick
:
there
may
be
uses
for
you
that
you
cannot
imagine
:
but
stay
a
little
,
may
you
not
carry
two
faces
under
one
hood
?
Who
doe
you
intend
shall
be
judge
of
what
is
right
&
just
in
this
your
resolution
?
Beleeve
it
;
by
your
writing
good
men
feare
,
that
either
your
understanding
is
very
erroneous
,
or
y●ur
conscience
very
dead
or
corrupt
:
and
then
if
you
will
be
judge
your selfe
;
the
Parliament
were
better
to
be
without
your
service
&
resolution
:
and
indeed
;
for
all
your
boasting
,
't
is
thought
you
have
been
and
are
but
a
back-friend
,
that
you
row
one
way
and
looke
another
;
which
in
plain
English
(
if
not
in
Scotch
)
is
to
play
the
dissembling
hypocrite
,
is
it
not
?
You
mightily
over
value
your
own
art
and
Sophistry
,
and
as
much
under
value
the
judgements
of
others
;
if
you
imagine
your
delusion
is
not
espied
by
every
common
capacity
:
you
write
not
in
defence
of
the
Scotch
papers
,
but
of
the
honour
of
the
Parlement
:
Oh
that
Englands
Parlement
were
advised
of
Joabs
treachery
,
who
while
he
saith
;
art
thou
in
health
my
Brother
,
and
salutes
it
with
a
pretended
Kisse
,
sheds
out
the
very
bowells
of
it
on
the
ground
.
2
Samuel
20
,
10.
either
be
what
thou
seemest
,
or
seeme
what
thou
art
:
this
sneaking
in
the
head
,
and
byting
by
the
heele
,
manifests
a
Serpent
,
and
that
the
poyson
of
aspes
is
under
your
tongue
:
if
there
were
no
more
;
this
large
Machivilian
preface
of
yours
(
if
well
weighed
)
would
sufficiently
declare
.
You
presume
not
to
examine
,
or
at
all
to
intermeddle
with
any
thing
spoken
within
those
wals
;
is
that
true
?
But
how
comes
that
passage
without
doors
to
escape
your
examen
,
which
is
placed
immediatly
before
the
Argument
,
page
the
third
,
of
Mr.
Chaloners
Speech
;
can
you
give
an
,
account
of
your
silence
therein
?
your
descanting
upon
the
parts
of
the
speech
and
passing
over
that
passage
in
silence
,
gives
just
ground
to
think
that
your
most
politick
observation
could
not
reach
to
defend
your
checks
from
collusion
,
and
eminent
receding
from
their
Covenant
therein
.
If
you
write
not
in
defence
of
the
Scotch
papers
;
what
meanes
then
your
strong
conceited
syllogisme
?
If
your
juggling
be
not
palpable
to
your selfe
,
you
have
indeed
lost
your
judgement
;
but
it
's
rather
to
be
feared
you
have
sold
both
judgement
and
conscience
for
worldly
respects
.
You
cannot
but
know
,
what
may
be
,
and
what
hath
been
said
and
maintained
too
,
of
contrivances
and
contracts
,
conducing
to
the
Kings
addresse
to
the
Scots
so
much
is
avoucht
,
beleeved
,
and
commonly
discourst
of
,
as
dissolves
the
knot
in
your
argument
,
the
Covenant
it self
being
first
cut
in
the
midst
with
a
dudgeon
dagger
,
whether
the
English
would
or
no
:
assure
your selfe
,
the
foundation
of
your
syllogisme
ought
to
have
been
the
Kings
voluntary
uninvited
,
uncontracted
going
to
the
Scots
;
If
you
will
have
it
of
any
force
with
the
People
:
for
most
men
doe
confidently
beleeve
,
there
was
all
the
parts
of
a
reall
bargaine
in
the
businesse
,
and
must
have
more
then
the
Scots
word
,
or
the
Embassadors
faith
,
or
the
Kings
Oath
to
prove
the
contrary
,
and
then
what
,
becomes
of
the
weight
you
layupon
the
Covenant
,
Treaty
,
or
Law
of
the
Nations
?
But
admit
your
syllogisme
held
good
in
all
partse
and
that
the
King
were
his
owne
man
a
midst
the
,
Scots
,
what
's
the
issue
?
why
then
say
you
His
person
is
not
to
be
disposed
of
but
by
joynt
consent
of
both
Nations
?
Well
;
be
it
so
,
neverthelesse
both
Nations
are
bound
to
agree
in
what
is
just
,
*
neither
Covenant
nor
Treaty
,
nor
Law
of
Nations
,
can
bind
in
any
thing
that
in
it selfe
is
evill
and
sinfull
;
concerning
the
Kings
person
then
;
should
both
Nations
consider
what
in
justice
is
to
be
done
?
In
the
first
place
,
would
they
not
consider
what
the
King
had
done
both
before
the
Warre
and
since
the
Warre
?
Wou'd
they
not
consider
what
the
proper-difference
is
between
a
King
and
a
Tyrant
,
and
finding
the
latter
character
upon
him
,
how
then
ought
they
to
dispose
of
his
Person
?
What
punishment
would
appeare
sufficient
for
Himselfe
?
What
would
become
of
his
posterity
,
Justice
impartially
being
agreed
upon
by
both
Nations
And
if
they
should
not
propose
justice
as
their
end
in
this
His
case
,
that
hath
so
generall
an
influence
upon
all
Nations
they
shall
certainly
perish
.
Shall
a
poore
indigent
wretched
,
inconsiderate
man
suffer
death
&
for
feit
the
wel-being
of
his
posterity
,
for
a
particular
offence
,
against
a
particular
Law
?
and
shall
He
and
His
escape
scot-free
that
for
sixteene
yeares
without
intermission
brake
the
Law
,
turned
the
government
up-side-downe
;
Null'd
Parlements
,
and
when
craft
and
cruelty
would
not
suffice
,
rais'd
a
most
unnaturall
Warre
against
this
Parliament
,
intermixing
the
most
devillish
plots
that
ever
were
to
destroy
both
Parlement
and
City
,
murthering
and
destroying
the
most
Religious
and
peaceable
People
in
all
places
and
never
by
all
intreaties
,
Treatyes
,
Covenants
[
and
indulgence
in
all
these
]
could
be
drawne
to
give
over
his
violent
and
inhuman
courses
,
till
necessity
enforc'd
,
and
then
by
a
most
unparaleld
contrivance
to
intangle
this
Nation
more
then
ever
?
What
can
the
true
servants
of
the
most
just
God
say
unto
such
a
Person
,
but
as
thy
sword
hath
made
so
many
thousand
thousands
of
women
childlesse
,
so
shal
thy
Mother
be
childlesse
amongst
women
?
That
our
records
might
instruct
posterity
with
such
a
memento
as
this
,
and
Samuel
hewed
Agag
in
peeces
before
the
Lord
in
Gilgal
:
Your
toy's
of
evill
Councell
,
and
the
King
can
doe
no
wrong
,
would
not
serve
Agags
turne
:
nor
Adonibezeck
,
nor
the
five
Kings
that
Joshua
hung
up
:
who
all
might
have
pleaded
evill
Councell
and
the
like
;
but
before
just
Judges
;
such
things
are
vanities
,
for
they
know
God
will
not
so
be
mocked
.
And
if
both
Nations
doe
justly
;
thus
they
ought
to
dispose
of
this
Kings
Person
;
and
then
there
is
an
end
of
this
controversy
.
That
our
English
Parlement
inclines
to
such
a
disposition
,
appeares
by
voting
of
his
Person
to
Warwick
Castle
;
but
the
Scots
agree
not
to
this
vote
;
but
fal
to
an
evident
Treaty
on
His
behalfe
,
and
not
only
for
his
immunity
(
which
with
what
conscience
they
can
doe
,
their
death-beads
will
tell
them
,
and
the
blood
of
the
slaine
)
but
for
a
necessity
of
restoring
Him
to
his
greatnesse
and
honour
;
to
justifie
which
their
doings
;
their
and
our
Covenant
with
,
the
most
just
God
,
is
by
them
insisted
on
;
to
compell
us
to
the
same
injustice
,
if
this
be
not
the
highest
mockery
that
ever
was
offered
unto
God
:
what
is
?
Yet
this
is
that
you
glory
to
maintaine
in
them
:
accounting
of
all
the
miseries
of
ths
Nation
,
but
as
a
hunting-match
,
or
horse-race
:
But
you
and
they
,
and
their
King
whom
they
now
stalke
with
all
;
will
one
day
find
that
wilfull
murthers
must
have
another
reckning
;
maugre
all
King
craft
,
Clergy-craft
,
and
Court-craft
in
the
world
.
But
if
it
were
agreed
,
they
had
a
joynt
and
equall
interest
in
the
Person
of
the
King
:
and
that
they
should
differ
about
disposing
of
him
:
the
Parliament
of
England
justly
resolving
to
punish
him
,
and
the
Parliament
of
Scotland
resolving
to
restore
him
to
his
honour
and
Authority
:
admit
the
Parliament
of
England
should
understand
that
they
were
no
waies
bound
to
preserve
his
Person
,
further
then
they
found
his
Person
in
the
defence
of
the
true
Protestant
Religion
,
the
liberties
of
the
People
,
and
privilege
of
Parliament
,
as
the
Covenant
doth
manifestly
imply
(
and
could
be
justly
taken
in
no
other
sense
)
but
if
they
found
him
in
the
opposition
of
all
those
,
and
in
the
violent
prosecution
of
all
kind
of
tyrany
,
oppression
and
cruelty
,
are
they
not
plainly
bound
by
the
same
Covenant
to
bring
him
to
condigne
punishment
,
as
the
chiefe
of
all
delinquents
?
can
the
death
of
Strafford
,
Canterbury
or
any
of
the
rest
be
justified
,
if
he
escape
that
set
them
on
worke
,
and
hath
infinitly
transcended
them
in
Treasons
against
the
Commonwealth
?
If
the
Parliament
of
Scotland
should
persist
in
their
interpretation
of
the
Covenant
,
that
they
understood
the
preservation
of
the
Kings
Person
,
His
Authority
and
power
to
be
alwaies
consistent
with
the
preservation
of
Religion
and
the
liberties
of
the
People
;
it
will
appeare
an
inforced
construction
,
because
sinfull
.
Did
you
lift
up
your
hand
to
the
most-high
high
God
to
bring
delinquents
to
condigne
punishmen
?
&
can
you
keep
your
Covenant
if
he
escape
scotfree
,
who
in
point
of
all
this
blood
&
cruelty
was
eminenter
causa
sine
qua
non
?
it
could
not
be
just
to
defend
His
Person
in
the
opposition
and
destruction
of
true
Religion
,
and
the
liberties
of
the
People
,
but
to
destroy
Him
as
any
other
,
nay
as
the
King
and
the
chiefe
Captaine
of
the
destroyers
,
and
this
the
People
talke
of
freely
one
with
other
;
and
the
contrary
being
but
the
fruit
of
art
and
sophistry
,
serveth
to
no
other
purpose
,
but
to
exasperate
them
against
whosoever
useth
those
delusions
,
abhominating
that
the
lives
of
so
many
precious
men
,
and
the
ruine
of
so
many
honest
families
should
be
set
at
so
cheap
a
rate
:
the
manifold
sorrowes
of
their
hearts
,
and
their
being
often
deceived
,
hath
opened
their
understandings
that
they
now
see
plainly
through
all
those
foldings
and
doublings
;
and
they
are
but
hated
that
use
them
.
But
to
the
point
;
admit
the
two
Parlements
should
thus
differ
;
what
then
becomes
of
your
much
laboured
syllogisme
?
You
see
the
dispute
is
begun
already
:
Sir
,
can
you
resolve
who
shall
be
judge
of
this
coutroversy
?
if
you
can
propose
none
;
(
as
certainly
you
cannot
)
what
then
?
must
Scotlands
resolution
be
a
Law
to
England
?
Your
face
indeed
;
looks
some-what
that
way
,
and
so
doe
the
Scotch-papers
too
,
but
why
so
?
if
the
negative
voice
so
much
pleaded
for
by
the
friends
of
prerogative
,
shall
now
be
re-assum'd
by
the
Scots
,
in
this
dispute
,
it
will
render
the
Parlement
more
incapable
of
preserving
the
Kingdome
now
then
ever
:
and
while
you
pretend
to
avoid
perjury
,
you
would
enforce
the
Parlement
upon
an
inevitable
slavery
.
If
England
and
Scotland
be
truly
measured
,
England
is
by
far
the
greater
and
much
more
populous
:
and
in
all
societies
,
the
Major
part
is
conclusive
,
or
they
can
never
come
to
any
determination
:
and
then
Englands
resolution
in
this
cause
,
ought
rather
to
conclude
Scotland
:
if
Scotland
thinkes
this
not
reasonable
;
what
then
?
must
there
be
a
strife
about
the
Person
?
why
then
strove
they
not
who
shall
be
most
forward
to
bring
him
to
justice
?
Why
is
there
such
a
coyle
about
his
honour
and
power
,
that
hath
sought
the
ruine
of
all
?
Sir
,
what
say
you
to
that
saying
in
the
speech
page
the
13
,
the
King
haveing
put
himselfe
frely
into
their
hands
,
they
cannot
with
honour
deliver
him
?
(
well
,
let
them
warme
the
Snake
as
long
as
England
did
,
and
they
may
hap
to
be
yet
as
wel
requited
)
but
what
man
that
hath
the
use
of
reason
,
beleeves
the
King
cast
himselfe
freely
upon
them
but
upon
pre-assurance
of
protection
;
therefore
talke
not
any
longer
of
honour
,
it
is
but
a
meere
trick
,
and
it
is
discovered
to
their
shame
:
't
is
not
denied
but
they
may
have
great
use
of
him
in
many
respects
,
to
make
advantages
upon
this
Nation
:
but
they
are
unjust
,
and
will
never
prosper
:
when
they
have
done
all
they
can
;
they
'le
find
many
of
those
they
thinke
they
have
sufficiently
deluded
&
perverted
,
that
yet
wil
never
be
alienated
fromour
English
Parlement
,
nor
be
wanting
to
make
good
their
Votes
and
resolutions
,
and
also
their
interpretations
.
There
are
no
great
number
of
your
perfidious
temper
that
employ
your
English
parts
and
abilities
,
to
plead
for
deceit
&
Tyrany
,
&
basely
to
inthrall
your
native
Country
;
what
hath
provoked
you
to
so
great
a
wickednesse
?
or
are
you
by
some
notorious
practices
become
so
obnoxious
,
that
you
cannot
thinke
your selfe
safe
if
justice
be
prosecuted
impartially
?
Doe
you
fear
it
will
at
last
arrive
at
you
?
it
can
be
no
other
,
if
so
,
yet
be
advised
,
repent
,
and
make
amends
,
adde
not
evill
to
evill
,
lest
to
escape
the
pan
you
leap
into
the
Fire
:
with
the
just
you
may
find
mercy
,
happily
your
evill
is
over
and
past
hurting
,
and
will
never
be
remembred
:
if
you
cast
your selfe
on
strangers
th●y
know
wherefore
you
doe
it
;
and
when
you
have
dontheir
worke
,
wil
cast
you
off
,
loving
the
work
but
abhominating
the
instrument
:
besides
;
your
labour
falls
upon
a
knowing
People
,
and
makes
no
impression
:
when
judicious
men
read
your
inference
upon
the
Covenant
,
defending
therein
the
affirmations
in
the
Scots
papers
touching
the
Kings
Person
:
and
after
read
over
that
breife
passage
of
M.
Chaloners
speech
:
all
that
you
have
said
comes
to
nothing
,
and
you
and
your
Master
are
great
loosers
,
so
unadvisedly
occasioning
the
receiving
of
that
worthy
and
effectuall
passage
,
which
,
in
due
thankfulnesse
to
that
faithfull
judicious
and
true
lover
of
his
Country
,
shall
be
here
recited
word
for
word
;
deserving
indeed
to
be
ingraven
in
Marble
,
and
to
remaine
in
the
Commons
House
to
all
posterity
.
They
say
saith
he
;
meaning
the
Scots
papers
)
that
by
vertue
of
the
Covenant
they
are
obliged
to
defend
his
Person
and
Authority
.
What
his
Authority
is
in
Scotland
,
themselves
best
know
;
but
you
only
are
to
judge
of
it
in
England
,
since
being
not
subordinate
to
any
power
on
Earth
,
there
is
no
power
under
Heaven
can
judge
you
.
The
Covenant
ties
you
to
maintaine
,
in
the
first
place
,
the
Rights
of
Parliament
,
and
the
liberties
of
the
Kingdome
;
and
in
the
second
place
,
the
Kings
Person
and
Authority
;
and
that
only
in
defence
of
the
former
,
and
not
otherwise
.
And
whereas
they
expect
the
King
should
be
received
by
you
with
honour
,
safety
,
and
freedome
;
I
beseech
you
Sir
,
consider
whether
(
as
the
case
now
stands
)
his
Reception
with
Honour
can
stand
with
the
Honour
of
the
Kingdome
,
whether
his
safety
be
not
incompatible
with
the
safety
of
the
Commonwealth
,
and
whether
his
freedome
be
not
inconsistent
wiih
the
freedome
of
the
People
.
I
pray
(
Sir
)
take
heed
lest
that
bringing
him
in
with
Honour
;
you
doe
not
dishonour
your selfe
,
and
question
the
very
justice
of
all
your
Actions
;
be
wary
that
in
receiving
him
with
safety
you
doe
not
thereby
endanger
and
hazard
the
Common-wealth
:
be
advised
,
lest
in
bringing
him
home
with
freedome
,
you
doe
not
thereby
lead
the
people
of
England
in
thraldome
,
I
pray
(
Sir
)
first
settle
the
honour
,
safety
and
freedome
of
the
Common-wealth
:
and
then
the
honour
,
safety
,
and
freedome
of
the
King
,
so
far
as
the
latter
may
stand
with
the
former
,
and
no
otherwise
.
Wherefor●
,
I
shall
conclude
with
my
humble
desire
that
you
would
adhere
to
your
former
Vote
,
that
is
,
that
the
King
be
disposed
of
as
both
Houses
of
Parliament
shall
thinke
fitting
;
and
that
you
enter
into
no
Treaty
neither
with
the
King
or
your
Brethren
of
Scotland
,
lest
otherwise
thereby
you
retard
the
going
home
of
their
Army
out
of
England
.
Sir
,
by
what
you
have
written
,
it
will
appeare
what
your
meaning
is
,
you
doe
but
flatter
your selfe
,
your
Conscience
wil
be
too
strong
for
you
,
and
condemne
you
wheresoever
you
are
,
it
will
afflict
you
in
your
private
,
and
distract
you
in
your
publick
occasions
:
in
the
end
death
comes
,
and
what
will
be
the
fruit
of
those
things
whereof
you
will
be
then
ashamed
,
when
Mr.
Chaloner
that
true
friend
to
the
people
shall
have
peace
in
the
cleere
discharge
of
his
trust
,
and
be
for
ever
beloved
af
all
good
men
;
both
in
Parlement
and
Common-wealth
?
You
are
justly
attended
with
the
common
unhappinesse
of
hypocrites
,
which
is
to
over
act
,
and
thereby
to
discover
themselves
most
,
when
they
intend
most
to
hide
themselves
:
so
fareth
it
with
you
in
the
beginning
progresse
and
end
of
your
discourse
:
being
professedly
for
the
honour
of
the
Parlement
,
when
nothing
,
was
ever
written
more
manifestly
to
the
dishonour
thereof
,
yet
that
in
the
close
of
all
,
you
might
be
thought
to
be
a
friend
;
you
sing
this
song
to
the
tune
of
the
old
Letany
,
from
the
plots
both
of
sectaries
and
Malignants
,
good
Lord
deliver
us
.
But
Sir
,
are
you
sure
you
are
no
Sectary
?
It
is
much
to
be
feared
you
are
,
ther
is
risen
up
of
late
a
sect
called
the
Scotch
paper-sect
,
a
very
dangerous
sect
,
a
sect
that
hath
plots
and
designs
,
and
tricks
and
contrivances
;
are
not
you
a
principall
member
of
this
new
sect
?
It
is
most
evident
you
are
:
it
is
not
supposed
you
are
zealously
of
any
other
sect
or
Religion
what
ever
you
professe
,
your
papers
acquit
you
from
all
suspition
thereof
:
for
most
of
those
that
are
called
sectaries
,
are
true
lovers
of
Englands
interest
,
and
have
a
care
to
admit
none
but
honest
men
into
their
fellowships
,
and
their
plots
are
to
preserve
with
their
lives
and
estates
,
those
just
liberties
of
this
Nation
,
and
priviledges
of
Parliament
:
whereof
you
and
such
as
you
are
,
are
making
an
uncleanly
conveyance
,
and
selling
for
some
vile
and
unworthy
respects
,
and
blesse
your selves
from
those
plots
of
sectaries
.
But
why
?
shame
you
to
be
thought
a
Malignant
,
you
know
,
and
it
is
evident
you
are
one
:
and
it
is
pretty
well
in
fashion
,
and
if
you
would
openly
professe
it
,
it
would
grow
in
favour
:
't
is
nothing
but
your
taking
and
pleading
for
the
Covenant
that
distinguishes
you
;
and
that
's
now
a
dayes
as
much
as
no
thing
;
what
is
it
,
so
long
as
you
are
your
own
interpreter
?
besides
,
you
see
it
is
the
most
likely
to
bring
in
the
King
your
head
.
Come
,
it
had
been
il
for
you
&
Him
and
all
the
Malignants
in
England
,
if
it
had
not
been
for
the
Covenant
;
and
therefore
presse
it
all
you
can
,
that
it
may
upon
penalty
be
taken
by
all
men
throughout
the
Nation
:
for
certainly
all
the
Malignants
will
take
it
,
and
then
they
shall
no
longer
be
●alled
malignants
,
but
Covenanters
,
and
if
any
scruple
it
,
it
will
be
those
sectaries
that
have
subdued
the
King
your
Master
and
all
his
forces
,
(
except
before
excepted
)
and
let
those
be
called
malignants
:
and
then
if
it
were
not
for
this
Parlement
,
yee
Covenanters
would
have
a
merry
world
once
againe
:
and
might
take
another
course
to
answer
such
speeches
as
Mr.
Chaloners
:
you
remember
what
was
done
in
the
third
yeare
of
this
King
:
those
were
brave
courses
,
and
you
long
to
see
them
againe
,
doe
you
not
?
Indeed
you
have
cause
,
for
if
Gentlemen
of
his
ability
in
the
House
(
as
God
be
blessed
there
are
very
many
)
doe
but
put
forth
their
parts
henceforward
as
he
hath
done
,
all
your
art
and
sophistry
will
compas
nothing
but
your
own
shame
and
ruine
:
which
is
the
Just
reward
of
your
Treachery
,
and
most
perfidious
breach
of
the
trust
you
have
undertaken
.
FINIS
.